Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiDoc Resources for Ambivalence


Most recent articles on Ambivalence

Most cited articles on Ambivalence

Review articles on Ambivalence

Articles on Ambivalence in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ


Powerpoint slides on Ambivalence

Images of Ambivalence

Photos of Ambivalence

Podcasts & MP3s on Ambivalence

Videos on Ambivalence

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Ambivalence

Bandolier on Ambivalence

TRIP on Ambivalence

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Ambivalence at Clinical

Trial results on Ambivalence

Clinical Trials on Ambivalence at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Ambivalence

NICE Guidance on Ambivalence


FDA on Ambivalence

CDC on Ambivalence


Books on Ambivalence


Ambivalence in the news

Be alerted to news on Ambivalence

News trends on Ambivalence


Blogs on Ambivalence


Definitions of Ambivalence

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Ambivalence

Discussion groups on Ambivalence

Patient Handouts on Ambivalence

Directions to Hospitals Treating Ambivalence

Risk calculators and risk factors for Ambivalence

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Ambivalence

Causes & Risk Factors for Ambivalence

Diagnostic studies for Ambivalence

Treatment of Ambivalence

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Ambivalence


Ambivalence en Espanol

Ambivalence en Francais


Ambivalence in the Marketplace

Patents on Ambivalence

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Ambivalence

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]


Ambivalence is a state of having emotions of both positive and negative valence or of having thoughts or actions in contradiction with each other, when they are related to the same object, idea or person (for example, feeling both love and hatred for someone or something). The term is also commonly used to refer to situations where 'mixed feelings' of a more general sort are experienced or where a person experiences uncertainty or indecisiveness concerning something. Template:Emotion

Ambivalence in psychoanalysis

In psychoanalytic terminology, however, a more refined definition applies: the term (introduced into the discipline by Bleuler in 1911), refers to an underlying emotional attitude in which the co-existing contradictory impulses (usually love and hate) derive from a common source and are thus held to be interdependent. Moreover, when the term is used in this psychoanalytic sense it would not usually be expected that the person embodying this 'ambivalence' would actually feel both of the two contradictory emotions as such: except in obsessional neurosis, which sees both sides being more or less 'balanced' in consciousness, one or other of the conflicting sides is usually repressed. (Thus, for example, an analysand's 'love' for his father might be quite consciously experienced and openly expressed – while his 'hate' for the same object might be heavily repressed and only indirectly expressed, and thus only revealed in analysis).

Another relevant distinction is that whereas the psychoanalytic notion of 'ambivalence' sees it as engendered by all neurotic conflict, a person's everyday 'mixed feelings' may easily be based on a quite realistic assessment of the imperfect, inconsistent or self-contradictory nature of the thing being considered.

Intellectual ambivalence

Intellectual ambivalence refers to an inability or unwillingness to commit oneself to a definite answer, position, or conclusion in thought ("yea or nay"), normally either because a definite stance is deliberately avoided or evaded for some personal motive, or because sufficient grounds (logical or experiential evidence) warranting a definite stance are lacking. To resolve intellectual ambivalence into a definite position is frequently a task for criticism or critique. The main problem with intellectual ambivalence is that it provides no clear guide or orientation for action and leadership. It is difficult to act or lead on the basis that something "might or might not be the case", that something "might or might not be a good idea" etc. In order to act or lead, definite ideas are necessary rather than uncertainty which incapacitates choices and decisions. Thus it often happens that someone in a leadership function pretends to be very "definite" about an issue, because the function requires it, even though he or she is in truth ambivalent about the issue.



See also

da:Ambivalens de:Ambivalenz nl:Ambivalentie no:Ambivalens sr:Амбиваленција fi:Ambivalenssi