Adenoma CT

Jump to: navigation, search

Adenoma Microchapters


Patient Information





Differentiating Adenoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology & Demographics

Risk Factors


Natural History, Complications & Prognosis


History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings


Chest X Ray



Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies


Medical Therapy


Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Adenoma CT On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides


American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Adenoma CT

All Images
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Adenoma CT

CDC on Adenoma CT

Adenoma CT in the news

Blogs on Adenoma CT

Directions to Hospitals Treating Adenoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Adenoma CT

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]


Unenchanced CT

  • Adrenal adenomas appear as small (<3 cm), well-defined homogeneous masses that are typically hypoattenuating relative to the liver.
  • At an attenuation value of less than 0 HU at unenhanced CT, the diagnosis of an adenoma can be made with 100% confidence; however, this threshold has only 47% sensitivity.
  • At cutoff of 18 HU, a diagnosis of adenoma was made with 100% specificity and 85% sensitivity, compared to the specificity:sensitivity ratio of 68%:100% with a more conservative cutoff of 10 HU.
  • A rational approach advocated by some authorities is to choose the CT number threshold on the basis of the patient’s risk for metastatic disease. For example, a threshold of 10 HU could be applied to older patients or to those with known primary malignancies. A threshold of 18 HU could be applied to younger patients without underlying cancer.

Enhanced CT

  • Lipid-poor adenomas are more difficult to diagnose because the CT numbers increase and approach those of soft tissue.
  • Contrast-enhanced imaging with 10-minute-delayed CT scans may be helpful in these cases.
    • By using a threshold of 30 HU, the sensitivity and specificity for delayed contrast-enhanced CT in the characterization of benign disease are 80% and 100%, respectively.
    • A relative percentage washout of more than 50% in the delayed study represents a sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 100%, respectively, for the detection of adenoma.