Transfer of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA to the nucleus

You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.

As a logical conclusion of the endosymbiotic theory, since modern-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes do not contain a full set of housekeeping genes, and lack many that other descendants of their speculative ancestors share, there must have been a loss of genes. However, some of these genes likely migrated to the nucleus, where analogues of these genes are now found.

Contents 1 Puzzle 2 Proposed explanations 3 References 4 See also

Puzzle

It is not clear why only a subset of genes have been transferred, when such gene transfer is known to be rapid - on a similar timescale as mutation. Mitochondria and chloroplasts perform redox reactions, which are known to be considerably mutagenic. Such mutagenicity would encourage migration of genes away from the organelles to the nucleus.

Proposed explanations

• Since chloroplast and mitochondrial genetic codes differ slightly from the eukaryotic nuclear code, some genes may lose function when they are transferred.

References

Allen, J. F., Puthiyaveetil, S., Ström, J. & Allen, C. A. 2005. BioEssays 27:426–435.

de Grey, A. D. N. J. 2005. Forces maintaining organellar genomes: is any as strong as genetic code disparity or hydrophobicity? BioEssays 27:436–446.

See also

• Human mitochondrial genetics
• Mitochondrial DNA