Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology

Aortic stenosis Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Classification Acquired: Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis Congenital: Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Subaortic Stenosis Subvalvular Aortic Stenosis Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Aortic Stenosis from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Cardiac Stress Test
Electrocardiogram
Chest X Ray
CT
MRI
Echocardiography
Cardiac Catheterization
Aortic Valve Area
Aortic Valve Area Calculation
Treatment
General Approach
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvotomy (PABV) or Aortic Valvuloplasty
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
Follow Up
Prevention
Precautions and Prophylaxis
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology
CDC on Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology
Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology in the news
Blogs on Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology</small>
Directions to Hospitals Treating Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology
Risk calculators and risk factors for Aortic stenosis microscopic pathology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D.

Overview

Common findings on microscopic pathologic evaluation in the patient with aortic stenosis include left ventricular hypertrophy and calcific degneration of the aortic valve.

An Autopsy Report

A 68-year-old man initially sought medical advice five years prior to his death. His symptoms at that time were exercise intolerance and occasional peripheral edema. He gave a history of a heart murmur that was diagnosed 25 years ago during an employment physical. No follow up care had been given for this murmur.

The patient's terminal admission was for signs of severe heart failure - the patient had marked peripheral edema and shortness of breath and chest x-ray revealed significant cardiac enlargement and pulmonary edema with bilateral pleural effusions. He sustained a cardiac arrest shortly after admission and could not be resuscitated.

Autopsy Imaging Findings

Autopsy disclosed a markedly enlarged heart weighing 650 grams and having dilated chambers. The aortic valve was calcified and showed evidence of stenosis and insufficiency. The coronary arteries were narrowed 60 to 70% by atherosclerosis. No acute coronary occlusions were found and there was no evidence of myocardial infarction.

• 

  This is a gross photograph of a cross section of a normal human heart taken at autopsy (right) and the heart from this case, which demonstrates concentric hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Note the marked thickening of the left ventricular wall. There is also moderate thickening of the right ventricular wall.

• 

  This low-power photomicrograph shows normal myocardium (left) compared to hypertrophied myocardium (right).

• 

  Normal myocardium (left) is compared here to hypertrophied myocardium (right). The muscle fibers are thicker and the nuclei are larger and darker in the hypertrophied myocardium.The clear spaces between the muscle fibers are due to processing artifacts and are not present during life.

• 

  Normal myocardium (left) is compared to hypertrophied myocardium (right). This high power view demonstrates the large dark nuclei (arrow) found in hypertrophied cardiac muscle cells. Polyploidy is a common feature in cardiac hypertrophy. Also note the increased size (thickness) of the individual cardiac muscle cell on the right compared to normal cardiac myocytes (left).