Accident-proneness

You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.

This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. Please help recruit one or improve this article yourself. See the talk page for details. Please consider using {{Expert-subject}} to associate this request with a WikiProject

Accident-proneness is the conception that some people have a predispositions to be more likely to have accidents, such as car crashes and industrial injuries, than other people.

The early work on this subject dates back to 1919, in a study by Greenwood and Woods, who studied workers at a British munitions factory and found that accidents were unevenly distributed among workers, with a relatively small proportion of workers account for most of the accidents. ^[1] Further work on accident-proneness was carried out in the 1930s and 1940s, and the subject is still being studied actively.

Research into accident-proneness is of great interest in safety engineering, where human factors such as pilot error, or errors by nuclear plant operators, can have massive effects on the reliability and safety of a system.

Statistical evidence clearly demonstrates that different individuals can have different rates of accidents from one another; for example, young male drivers are the group at highest risk for being involved in car crashes. There also seems to be substantial variation in personal accident rates between individuals.

However, a number of studies have cast doubt on whether accident-proneness actually exists as a distinct, persistent and independently verifiable physiological or psychological syndrome. Although substantial research has been devoted to this subject, there still seems to be no conclusive evidence either for or against the existence of accident proneness in this sense.

The exact nature and causes of accident-proneness, assuming that it exists as a distinct entity, are unknown. Factors which have been considered as associated with accident-proneness have included absent-mindedness, clumsiness, carelessness, impulsivity, predisposition to risk-taking, and unconscious desires to create accidents as a way of achieving secondary gains.

Contents 1 See also 2 References 3 Sources 4 External links

See also

• Accident investigation
• Diathesis-stress model
• Human factors

References

1. ↑ Greenwood, M. and Woods, H.M. (1919) The incidence of industrial accidents upon individuals with special reference to multiple accidents. Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Medical Research Committee, Report No. 4. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.

Sources

Note: this article is partly based on public domain text from the U.S. government public domain document "Accident Proneness: A Research Review"

External links

• Rodgers, Mark D. and Blanchard, Robert E. Accident Proneness: A Research Review. Federal Civil Aeromedical Institute Report DOT/FAA/AM-93-9, March 2003.
• Arnold J. Rawson. Accident Proneness. Psychosomatic Medicine 6:88-94 (1944)
• W. L. Cresswell and P. Frogatt. Accident Proneness, or Variable Accident Tendency? Dublin: Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, Vol. XX, Part V, 1961/1962, pp152-171
• Accident Statistics and the Concept of Accident-Proneness
• Accident Theories and Their Implications for Research