Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Second degree AV block Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Second degree AV block from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

EKG Examples

Chest X Ray

Echocardiography

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

CDC on Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Second degree AV block

Risk calculators and risk factors for Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2]

Overview

Electrocardiographic monitoring can be used to identify the changes in QRS morphology such as alternating bundle branch block in the presence of atrioventricular conduction abnormalities. Also,Treadmill exercise stress testing may be diagnostic to differentiate that 2:1 atrioventricular block is Mobitz type I or II in some cases or identify the presence of infranodal disease. In addition, EPS may be helpful to determine the anatomic site of block in mobitz type 2 atrioventricular block including atrioventricular node, intra-His, or infra-His. Worsening atrioventricular block with isoproterenol and atropine may be suggestive of infranodal block. However, improvement of atrioventricular conduction with carotid sinus massage may be observed in patients with infranodal atrioventricular block.

Other diagnostic studies


Additional testing for management of bradycardia associated atrioventricular block
Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (Class IIa , Level of Evidence B):

Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring is recommended in patients with first degree AV block, or mobitz type 1 second degree AV block to establish the correlation between symptoms related to bradycardia (lightheadness, syncope) and atrioventricular block

Exercise treadmill test (Class IIa , Level of Evidence C):

Exercise treadmill test is reasonable in patients with first degree AV block or mobitz type 1 second degree AV block in resting ECG who have chest pain or shortness of breath during exercise to identify the benefit of permanent pacing

Electrophysiologic study (Class IIb , Level of Evidence B):

EPS may be considered in selective patients with second degree AV block to determine the level of block

Pharmacologic challenge tests (Class IIb , Level of Evidence C):

Atropine, procainamide, isoproternole, carotide sinus massage may be used in selected patients with second degree AV block to determine the level of block and benefit from permanent pacing


The above table adopted from 2018 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline[1]


Notes

References

  1. Kusumoto, Fred M.; Schoenfeld, Mark H.; Barrett, Coletta; Edgerton, James R.; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.; Gold, Michael R.; Goldschlager, Nora F.; Hamilton, Robert M.; Joglar, José A.; Kim, Robert J.; Lee, Richard; Marine, Joseph E.; McLeod, Christopher J.; Oken, Keith R.; Patton, Kristen K.; Pellegrini, Cara N.; Selzman, Kimberly A.; Thompson, Annemarie; Varosy, Paul D. (2019). "2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society". Circulation. 140 (8). doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. ISSN 0009-7322.
  2. Sivakumaran S, Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Finan J, Yee R, Renner S, Skanes AC (July 2003). "A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope". Am J Med. 115 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00233-x. PMID 12867227.
  3. Barold SS (November 2001). "Lingering misconceptions about type I second-degree atrioventricular block". Am J Cardiol. 88 (9): 1018–20. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01980-4. PMID 11703999.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Bakst A, Goldberg B, Schamroth L (September 1975). "Significance of exercise-induced second degree atrioventricular block". Br Heart J. 37 (9): 984–6. doi:10.1136/hrt.37.9.984. PMC 482908. PMID 1191459.
  5. Fisher JD (1981). "Role of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with known and suspected bradycardias and tachycardias". Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 24 (1): 25–90. doi:10.1016/0033-0620(81)90026-8. PMID 7019962.
  6. Zipes DP (September 1979). "Second-degree atrioventricular block". Circulation. 60 (3): 465–72. doi:10.1161/01.cir.60.3.465. PMID 378457.
  7. Twidale N, Heddle WF, Tonkin AM (October 1988). "Procainamide administration during electrophysiology study--utility as a provocative test for intermittent atrioventricular block". Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 11 (10): 1388–97. PMID 2462213.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Mangiardi LM, Bonamini R, Conte M, Gaita F, Orzan F, Presbitero P, Brusca A (April 1982). "Bedside evaluation of atrioventricular block with narrow QRS complexes: usefulness of carotid sinus massage and atropine administration". Am J Cardiol. 49 (5): 1136–45. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(82)90037-6. PMID 7064840.


Template:WikiDoc Sources