PCI complications: Hemodynamic Support for Complex PCI: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
**But its usage is limited in [[patients]] with severe peripheral [[artery]] or [[aorta|aortic]] [[disease]].<ref name="pmid34895950">{{cite journal| author=Writing Committee Members. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM | display-authors=etal| title=2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 2022 | volume= 79 | issue= 2 | pages= e21-e129 | pmid=34895950 | doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=34895950  }} </ref>
**But its usage is limited in [[patients]] with severe peripheral [[artery]] or [[aorta|aortic]] [[disease]].<ref name="pmid34895950">{{cite journal| author=Writing Committee Members. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM | display-authors=etal| title=2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 2022 | volume= 79 | issue= 2 | pages= e21-e129 | pmid=34895950 | doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=34895950  }} </ref>
**One of the advantages of this device is the small [[catheter]] size which reduces the risk of vascular access site [[Complication (medicine)|complications]]. Moreover, ease of use is another advantage of [[intra-aortic balloon pump]].
**One of the advantages of this device is the small [[catheter]] size which reduces the risk of vascular access site [[Complication (medicine)|complications]]. Moreover, ease of use is another advantage of [[intra-aortic balloon pump]].
*[[Impella device|The Impella Percutaneous Left Ventricular–assist Devices]]
**This device provides greater [[left ventricle|left ventricular]] support.
**Nevertheless, usage of this device is limited in [[patients]] with [[left ventricular thrombus]], [[aortic stenosis]], [[peripheral artery disease]], or [[aorta|aortic]] [[disease]].
*Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the Tandem-Heart devices
**These devices are rarely used in order to support complex [[PCI]]


====2021 ACA Revascularization Guideline====
====2021 ACA Revascularization Guideline====

Revision as of 14:27, 9 July 2022

Hemodynamic Support for Complex PC

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editors-In-Chief: Anahita Deylamsalehi, M.D.[2]

Overview

Pathophysiology

Rapid hemodynamic deterioration and death during PCI can occur due to hypotension, decompensated heart failure, shock, or arrhythmias.[1][2][3]

Prevention

Hemodynamic Support Devices

2021 ACA Revascularization Guideline

Class 2b Recommendation, Level of Evidence: B-R [1]
Using an appropriate hemodynamic support device in the elective settings and among selected patients is reasonable to prevent hemodynamic compromise during PCI.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Writing Committee Members. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM; et al. (2022). "2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines". J Am Coll Cardiol. 79 (2): e21–e129. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006. PMID 34895950 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, Booth J, Pitt M, Blackman D; et al. (2010). "Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial". JAMA. 304 (8): 867–74. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1190. PMID 20736470.
  3. O'Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, Henriques JP, Dixon S, Massaro J; et al. (2012). "A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study". Circulation. 126 (14): 1717–27. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098194. PMID 22935569.