Difference between revisions of "Multivessel coronary artery disease"

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
==Treatment Choices==
 
==Treatment Choices==
  
* Medical therapy: Anti-anginal and anti-platelet medications as well as high dose statins; new anti-anginals
+
* Medical therapy: [[Anti-anginal]] and anti-platelet medications as well as high dose [[statins]]; new [[Antianginal|anti-anginals]]
* Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stents
+
* [[PCI|Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)]] with [[drug eluting stents]]
* Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)
+
* [[CABG|Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)]]
  
==Advantages of medical versus invasive therapies==
+
==Advantages of Each Choice==
* Medical therapy: no procedural risk or prolonged convalescence but risk of angina and decreased quality of life with 30% of the patients eventually needing revascularization (COURAGE trial)
+
===Medical Therapy===
* Revascularization (PCI or CABG) compared with medical therapy: less angina, fewer anti-anginal medications, better functional capacity & quality of life
+
All patients should receive optimal medical therapies to reduce cardiovascular event-risk and [[angina]].  Patients with lower-risk, stable CAD may be effectively treated by medical therapy.  Medical therapy has no procedural risk or prolonged [[convalescence]], but the COURAGE Trial<ref name="pmid17387127">{{cite journal |author=Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, ''et al.'' |title=Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=356 |issue=15 |pages=1503–16 |year=2007 |month=April |pmid=17387127 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa070829 |url=}}</ref> showed an increased risk of [[angina]], a decreased quality of life, and 30% of the patients eventually needed [[revascularization]].  Approximately 2/3 of the study population in COURAGE had multi-vessel CAD, and randomization to an initial strategy of medical therapy resulted in similar rates of death and [[MI|myocardial infarction (MI)]] to an initial strategy of PCI.
* CABG vs. medical therapy: CABG offers survival benefit in patients with left main stenosis, multivessel disease & LV systolic dysfunction, 3-vessel disease with proximal LAD stenosis regardless of LV function, and 2-vessel disease & LV systolic dysfunction (esp with proximal disease & severe angina)
+
 
* PCI vs. CABG: PCI less invasive, shorter hospital stay and convalescence, less expensive initial hospital stay; cost advantage may be lost over long-term due to need for repeat revascularization; one must be confident of their ability to achieve complete revascularization with PCI when offering it as an alternative to CABG
+
===Revascularization===
* CABG:
+
When compared with medical therapy, [[revascularization]] (PCI or CABG) is associated with less angina, fewer [[anti-anginal]] medications, and better functional capacity and quality of life.
** associated with lower incidence of recurrent angina and need for repeat revascularization
+
 
** offers reduction in late cardiac mortality in diabetic patients who receive at least 1 internal mammary (IMA) graft
+
====Revascularization by CABG====
** the rate of revascularization maybe comparable in the era of drug eluting stents (trials are pending)
+
CABG is associated with a lower incidence of recurrent [[angina]] and need for repeat [[revascularization]].  It offers reduction in late cardiac [[mortality]] in diabetic patients who receive at least 1 [[internal mammary|internal mammary (IMA)]] graft.  The rate of revascularization may be comparable in the era of [[drug eluting stents]] (trials are pending)
* Recommendations are limited by quality of data: older trials of CABG vs. medical therapy had little use of IMA conduit and limited use of ASA, ACEIs, and statins; many PCI vs. CABG trials did not have widespread use of stents, (either bare metal or drug-eluting) or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and <10% of patients screened for trials of PTCA vs. CABG were randomized, and therefore highly select)
+
 
* With multivessel stenting TLR rates become cumulative TLR rate per lesion is triple that per patient
+
Recommendations are limited by the quality of data.  For instance, older trials of CABG vs. medical therapy had little use of IMA conduit and limited use of [[ASA]], [[ACEIs]], and [[statins]].  Many PCI vs. CABG trials did not have widespread use of stents (either bare metal or drug-eluting) or [[GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors]], and <10% of patients screened for trials of [[PTCA]] vs. [[CABG]] were randomized, and therefore highly selectWith multivessel stenting, TLR rates become cumulative TLR rate per lesion is triple that per patient.  [[Diabetics]] with both [[retinopathy]] and [[nephropathy]] appear to have very high major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates with PCI (up to 50%).
* Diabetics with both retinopathy and nephropathy appear to have very high MACE rates with PCI (up to 50%)
+
 
 +
Several randomized trials of CABG versus medical therapy support the concept of greater absolute benefit of CABG in respect to long-term survival in patients with more extensive or proximal CAD or those with LV contractile dysfunction.  These data were limited by low usage of IMA grafting, anti-platelet agents, and high cross-over of the medical treatment arm.  Specifically, CABG offers survival benefit in patients with left main stenosis, multivessel disease and LV systolic dysfunction, 3-vessel disease with proximal LAD stenosis regardless of LV function, and 2-vessel disease and LV systolic dysfunction, especially with proximal disease and severe angina.
 +
 
 +
====Revascularization by PCI====
 +
The subgroup analysis of patients with stable, multi-vessel CAD in the COURAGE trial suggested no difference in death and MI rates between PCI- and medically-treated groups. 
 +
 
 +
====PCI vs. CABG====
 +
In comparison to CABG, PCI is less invasive, has a shorter hospital stay and convalescence, is less expensive initial hospital stay; cost advantage may be lost over long-term due to need for repeat revascularization; one must be confident of their ability to achieve complete revascularization with PCI when offering it as an alternative to CABG.
 +
 
 +
The BARI trial showed similar 5-year survival among over 1800 patients randomized to an initial strategy of PTCA or CABG for multi-vessel CAD despite the higher rates of “complete revascularization” in the CABG arm.  This trial preceded the use of drug eluting stents.  However, these treatments differ in the need for repeat revascularizations and relief of angina.
 +
 
 +
Due to higher CABG mortality in patients with [[Unstable angina / non ST elevation myocardial infarction|UA/NSTEMI]], a strategy of PCI to the “culprit artery” followed by elective, as needed, revascularization of the residual disease may be employed.  Identification of the culprit artery requires localizing [[ECG]], [[echocardiographic]], or angiographic features (coronary [[thrombus]], ulcerative plaque, slow flow, a high grade [[stenosis]], or pressure wire technique).
 +
 
 +
The ARTS and SYNTAX trials showed higher primary event rates in patients randomized to PCI versus CABG, driven by higher need for revascularization.  Rates of hard events such as death and MI were similar between the treatment groups.
  
 
==Patient selection and initial approach==
 
==Patient selection and initial approach==

Revision as of 19:12, 20 August 2010

WikiDoc Resources for Multivessel coronary artery disease

Articles

Most recent articles on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Most cited articles on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Review articles on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Articles on Multivessel coronary artery disease in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Images of Multivessel coronary artery disease

Photos of Multivessel coronary artery disease

Podcasts & MP3s on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Videos on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Bandolier on Multivessel coronary artery disease

TRIP on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Multivessel coronary artery disease at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Clinical Trials on Multivessel coronary artery disease at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Multivessel coronary artery disease

NICE Guidance on Multivessel coronary artery disease

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Multivessel coronary artery disease

CDC on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Books

Books on Multivessel coronary artery disease

News

Multivessel coronary artery disease in the news

Be alerted to news on Multivessel coronary artery disease

News trends on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Commentary

Blogs on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Definitions

Definitions of Multivessel coronary artery disease

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Discussion groups on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Patient Handouts on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Directions to Hospitals Treating Multivessel coronary artery disease

Risk calculators and risk factors for Multivessel coronary artery disease

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Multivessel coronary artery disease

Causes & Risk Factors for Multivessel coronary artery disease

Diagnostic studies for Multivessel coronary artery disease

Treatment of Multivessel coronary artery disease

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Multivessel coronary artery disease

International

Multivessel coronary artery disease en Espanol

Multivessel coronary artery disease en Francais

Business

Multivessel coronary artery disease in the Marketplace

Patents on Multivessel coronary artery disease

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Multivessel coronary artery disease

Cardiology Network
Wikidoc-cardiology-network.jpg
Discuss Multivessel coronary artery disease further in the WikiDoc Cardiology Network
Adult Congenital
Biomarkers
Cardiac Rehabilitation
Congestive Heart Failure
CT Angiography
Echocardiography
Electrophysiology
Cardiology General
Genetics
Health Economics
Hypertension
Interventional Cardiology
MRI
Nuclear Cardiology
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Prevention
Public Policy
Pulmonary Embolism
Stable Angina
Valvular Heart Disease
Vascular Medicine

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Associate Editors-In-Chief: Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, MD,[2]; Robert Sperling, MD; Brian Bigelow, MD; Roger J. Laham, MD [3]; Neil M. Gheewala, MD; Randall K. Harada, MD

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [4] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Background

Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a higher burden of co-morbidities, LV dysfunction, and cardiovascular risk. Medical decisions are frequently based on clinical trial data that are now potentially supplanted by improvements in contemporary medical, percutaneous, and surgical strategies.

Goals of Treatment

Management of multi-vessel coronary artery disease focuses on:

  • Reduction of adverse event risk
  • Relief of angina and heart failure symptoms
  • Delaying cardiac morbidity

Treatment Choices

Advantages of Each Choice

Medical Therapy

All patients should receive optimal medical therapies to reduce cardiovascular event-risk and angina. Patients with lower-risk, stable CAD may be effectively treated by medical therapy. Medical therapy has no procedural risk or prolonged convalescence, but the COURAGE Trial[1] showed an increased risk of angina, a decreased quality of life, and 30% of the patients eventually needed revascularization. Approximately 2/3 of the study population in COURAGE had multi-vessel CAD, and randomization to an initial strategy of medical therapy resulted in similar rates of death and myocardial infarction (MI) to an initial strategy of PCI.

Revascularization

When compared with medical therapy, revascularization (PCI or CABG) is associated with less angina, fewer anti-anginal medications, and better functional capacity and quality of life.

Revascularization by CABG

CABG is associated with a lower incidence of recurrent angina and need for repeat revascularization. It offers reduction in late cardiac mortality in diabetic patients who receive at least 1 internal mammary (IMA) graft. The rate of revascularization may be comparable in the era of drug eluting stents (trials are pending).

Recommendations are limited by the quality of data. For instance, older trials of CABG vs. medical therapy had little use of IMA conduit and limited use of ASA, ACEIs, and statins. Many PCI vs. CABG trials did not have widespread use of stents (either bare metal or drug-eluting) or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and <10% of patients screened for trials of PTCA vs. CABG were randomized, and therefore highly select. With multivessel stenting, TLR rates become cumulative TLR rate per lesion is triple that per patient. Diabetics with both retinopathy and nephropathy appear to have very high major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates with PCI (up to 50%).

Several randomized trials of CABG versus medical therapy support the concept of greater absolute benefit of CABG in respect to long-term survival in patients with more extensive or proximal CAD or those with LV contractile dysfunction. These data were limited by low usage of IMA grafting, anti-platelet agents, and high cross-over of the medical treatment arm. Specifically, CABG offers survival benefit in patients with left main stenosis, multivessel disease and LV systolic dysfunction, 3-vessel disease with proximal LAD stenosis regardless of LV function, and 2-vessel disease and LV systolic dysfunction, especially with proximal disease and severe angina.

Revascularization by PCI

The subgroup analysis of patients with stable, multi-vessel CAD in the COURAGE trial suggested no difference in death and MI rates between PCI- and medically-treated groups.

PCI vs. CABG

In comparison to CABG, PCI is less invasive, has a shorter hospital stay and convalescence, is less expensive initial hospital stay; cost advantage may be lost over long-term due to need for repeat revascularization; one must be confident of their ability to achieve complete revascularization with PCI when offering it as an alternative to CABG.

The BARI trial showed similar 5-year survival among over 1800 patients randomized to an initial strategy of PTCA or CABG for multi-vessel CAD despite the higher rates of “complete revascularization” in the CABG arm. This trial preceded the use of drug eluting stents. However, these treatments differ in the need for repeat revascularizations and relief of angina.

Due to higher CABG mortality in patients with UA/NSTEMI, a strategy of PCI to the “culprit artery” followed by elective, as needed, revascularization of the residual disease may be employed. Identification of the culprit artery requires localizing ECG, echocardiographic, or angiographic features (coronary thrombus, ulcerative plaque, slow flow, a high grade stenosis, or pressure wire technique).

The ARTS and SYNTAX trials showed higher primary event rates in patients randomized to PCI versus CABG, driven by higher need for revascularization. Rates of hard events such as death and MI were similar between the treatment groups.

Patient selection and initial approach

  • Risk factor modification for all patients (smoking cessation, treatment of HTN, correction of dyslipidemia)
  • Choose medical therapy when LV systolic function normal or mildly depressed & lifestyle acceptable w/ medical therapy
  • Choose revascularization:

1) when unacceptable syptoms persist despite optimal medical therapy

2) when lesions and risk factors are present for which revascularization improves morbidity & mortality compared w/ medical therapy

  • Scenarios favoring CABG vs. medical therapy for prolonging survival:
    • left main stenosis >50%,
    • multivessel disease & LV systolic dysfunction,
    • 3-vessel disease with proximal LAD stenosis regardless of LV function,
    • 2-vessel disease & LV systolic dysfunction (especially with proximal disease & severe angina)
  • Choose PCI over CABG:
    • lesions suitable for PCI,
    • younger patients with expected CABG in future to delay time to surgery,
    • high operative risk (including: cerebrovascular disease & severe COPD), illness limiting survival,
    • poor conduit (no IMA available or poor vein quality),
    • patient prefers to avoid surgery
  • Choose CABG over PCI:
    • in the presence of associated valvular disease requiring surgical repair,
    • complete functional revascularization unlikely to be achieved w/PCI,
    • lesions not suitable for stenting (low likelihood of success, high risk of complications, high risk of restenosis),
    • patient prefers to limit number of revascularization procedures
  • CABG vs. PCI Outcomes:
    • mortality & nonfatal MI rates not significantly different
    • higher rate of recurrent angina & repeat revascularization after PCI (most trials in low-risk patients with 2-vessel disease & normal LV function); this may change in the near future with coated stents
    • In nondiabetic patients with 3-vessel disease and poor LV systolic function, consider PCI in select patients with low-risk lesions if complete revascularization can be achieved; risk and benefits of lifelong plavix and risks of stent thrombosis must be discussed extensively
    • Diabetic patients with 2- or 3-vessel disease:
      • in general, CABG is recommended as BARI trial showed improved survival after CABG compared with multivessel PCI if at least one IMA conduit was used & there were 4 or more lesions, especially in patients with LV systolic dysfunction
      • however, BARI trial was done in the pre-stent era and before the widespread use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
      • there was no difference in survival among DM patients treated with CABG vs. PCI in 2 nonrandomized trials incl 5-y survival in BARI registry
      • it is possible that carefully selected patients with Diabetes can be successfully managed with PCI in the drug eluting stent era

Technical and pharmacologic considerations

  • One may need to stage the procedure because of contrast load and radiation dose, as well as procedure time.
  • Starting with the most challenging lesion in patients for whom CABG is an option, may be advisable to evaluate feasibility of complete revascularization
  • Assessment of patient’s ability to comply with lifetime dual antiplatelet therapy is also crutial especially with bifurcation stenting, long lesions and small vessels, which are common in patients with multivessel disease where risk of stent thrombosis is highest

Expected long-term outcomes

  • Resolution of angina and ischemia with both PCI and CABG and prolongation of life in selected high-risk patients with CABG
  • Consider revascularization for persistent angina or ischemia with medical therapy
  • Consider CABG when PCI does not successfully revascularize significant stenoses
  • Consider PCI to treat unrevascularized lesions when angina or ischemia persist after CABG, or when grafts fail (15% in the first month and 80% in 10-15 years)

Cost Effectiveness of Multivessel coronary artery disease

| group5 = Clinical Trials Involving Multivessel coronary artery disease | list5 = Ongoing Trials on Multivessel coronary artery disease at Clinical Trials.govTrial results on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseClinical Trials on Multivessel coronary artery disease at Google


| group6 = Guidelines / Policies / Government Resources (FDA/CDC) Regarding Multivessel coronary artery disease | list6 = US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseNICE Guidance on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseNHS PRODIGY GuidanceFDA on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseCDC on Multivessel coronary artery disease


| group7 = Textbook Information on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list7 = Books and Textbook Information on Multivessel coronary artery disease


| group8 = Pharmacology Resources on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list8 = AND (Dose)}} Dosing of Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (drug interactions)}} Drug interactions with Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (side effects)}} Side effects of Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (Allergy)}} Allergic reactions to Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (overdose)}} Overdose information on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (carcinogenicity)}} Carcinogenicity information on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (pregnancy)}} Multivessel coronary artery disease in pregnancyAND (pharmacokinetics)}} Pharmacokinetics of Multivessel coronary artery disease


| group9 = Genetics, Pharmacogenomics, and Proteinomics of Multivessel coronary artery disease | list9 = AND (pharmacogenomics)}} Genetics of Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (pharmacogenomics)}} Pharmacogenomics of Multivessel coronary artery diseaseAND (proteomics)}} Proteomics of Multivessel coronary artery disease


| group10 = Newstories on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list10 = Multivessel coronary artery disease in the newsBe alerted to news on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseNews trends on Multivessel coronary artery disease


| group11 = Commentary on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list11 = Blogs on Multivessel coronary artery disease

| group12 = Patient Resources on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list12 = Patient resources on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseDiscussion groups on Multivessel coronary artery diseasePatient Handouts on Multivessel coronary artery diseaseDirections to Hospitals Treating Multivessel coronary artery diseaseRisk calculators and risk factors for Multivessel coronary artery disease


| group13 = Healthcare Provider Resources on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list13 = Symptoms of Multivessel coronary artery diseaseCauses & Risk Factors for Multivessel coronary artery diseaseDiagnostic studies for Multivessel coronary artery diseaseTreatment of Multivessel coronary artery disease

| group14 = Continuing Medical Education (CME) Programs on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list14 = CME Programs on Multivessel coronary artery disease

| group15 = International Resources on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list15 = Multivessel coronary artery disease en EspanolMultivessel coronary artery disease en Francais

| group16 = Business Resources on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list16 = Multivessel coronary artery disease in the MarketplacePatents on Multivessel coronary artery disease

| group17 = Informatics Resources on Multivessel coronary artery disease | list17 = List of terms related to Multivessel coronary artery disease


}}

  1. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK; et al. (2007). "Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease". N. Engl. J. Med. 356 (15): 1503–16. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070829. PMID 17387127. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Linked-in.jpg