Melanoma diagnostic study of choice

Revision as of 19:12, 31 July 2019 by Sabawoon Mirwais (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Melanoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Melanoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Melanoma diagnostic study of choice On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Melanoma diagnostic study of choice

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Melanoma diagnostic study of choice

CDC on Melanoma diagnostic study of choice

Melanoma diagnostic study of choice in the news

Blogs on Melanoma diagnostic study of choice

Directions to Hospitals Treating Melanoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Melanoma diagnostic study of choice

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

Overview

All patients with suspected melanoma require biopsy. Findings on biopsy may distinguish the sub-type and the stage of melanoma. Staging of melanoma is essential to determine the prognosis. Staging is based on the eight edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma TNM Classification.

Diagnostic Study of Choice

The following algorithm illustrates the approach to patients with suspected melanoma.[1]

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Suspicious pigmented lesion
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Biopsy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inadequate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rebiopsy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Melanoma confirmed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Breslow thickness
 
Ulceration status
 
Mitotic rate
 
Depth and peripheral margin status
 
Presence of satellitosis
 
Clark level for lesions ≤ 1 mm
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reassessment with complete physical examination, including neurological exam and lymph node assessment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Biopsy

  • Patients who have lesions suspected to be melanoma should always be biopsied.[1]
  • An excisional biopsy (either elliptical, punch, or saucerization) of the thickest portion of the lesion with 1-3 mm margins is recommended.[1]
  • Shave biopsy is acceptable only when the index of suspicion for melanoma is low.[1]
  • The following should be reported when a biopsy is being reported:[1]


To view the histopathologic characteristic features of all subtypes of melanoma, click here.

Staging

Eight Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma TNM Staging System

Primary Tumor (T) Classification[2][3][4][5]

T classification Thickness Ulceration status
TX: Primary tumor thickness cannot be assessed (eg, diagnosis by curettage) Not applicable Not applicable
T0: No evidence of primary tumor (eg, unknown primary or completely regressed melanoma) Not applicable Not applicable
Tis (Melanoma in situ) Not applicable Not applicable
T1 ≤ 1.0 mm or unspecified
T1a < 0.8 mm No ulceration
T1b < 0.8 mm Ulceration present
0.8 – 1.0 mm With or without ulceration
T2 > 1.0 – 2.0 mm Unknown or unspecified
T2a > 1.0 – 2.0 mm No ulceration
T2b > 1.0 – 2.0 mm Ulceration present
T3 > 2.0 – 4.0 mm Unknown or unspecified
T3a > 2.0–4.0 mm No ulceration
T3b > 2.0–4.0 mm Ulceration present
T4 > 4.0 mm Unknown or unspecified
T4a > 4.0 mm No ulceration
T4b > 4.0 mm Ulceration present

Regional Lymph Nodes (N) Classification[6]

N Classification Number of Nodes Presence of In-Transit, Satelite, and/or microsatellite Metastases
NX Regional nodes not assessed (eg, sentinel lymph node [SLN] biopsy not performed, regional nodes previously removed for another reason); Exception: pathological N category is not required for T1 melanomas, use clinical N information No
N0 No regional metastases detected No
N1 One tumor-involved node or any number of in-transit, satellite, and/or microsatellite metastases with no tumor-involved nodes
N1a One clinically occult (i.e., detected by SLN biopsy) No
N1b One clinically detected No
N1c No regional lymph node disease Yes
N2 Two or 3 tumor-involved nodes or any number of in-transit, satellite, and/or micro- satellite metastases with one tumor-involved node
N2a 2 or 3 clinically occult (i.e., detected by SLN biopsy) No
N2b 2 or 3 nodes, at least one of which was clinically detected No
N2c One clinically occult or clinically detected Yes
N3 4 or more tumor-involved nodes or any number of in-transit, satellite, and/or microsatellite metastases with 2 or more tumor-involved nodes, or any number of matted nodes without or with in-transit, satellite, and/or microsatellite metastases
N3a 4 or more clinically occult (i.e., detected by SLN biopsy) No
N3b 4 or more, at least one of which was clinically detected, or the presence of any number of matted nodes No
N3c 2 or more clinically occult or clinically detected and/or presence of any number of matted nodes Yes

Distant Metastasis (M)[7]

M Classification Site Serum LDH
M0 No evidence of distant metastasis Not applicable
M1 Evidence of distant metastasis
M1a Distant metastasis to skin, soft tissue including muscle, and/or non-regional lymph node Not recorded or unspecified
M1a (0) Not elevated
M1a (1) Elevated
M1b Distant metastasis to lung with or without M1a sites of disease Not recorded or unspecified
M1b (0) Not elevated
M1b (1) Elevated
M1c Distant metastasis to non-CNS visceral sites with or without M1a or M1b sites of disease Not recorded or unspecified
M1c (0) Not elevated
M1c (1) Elevated
M1d Distant metastasis to CNS with or without M1a, M1b, or M1c sites of disease Not recorded or unspecified
M1d (0) Not elevated
M1d (1) Elevated

Clark Level[8]

Clark Level Definition
Level I Above the basement membrane
Level II Infiltrating the papillary dermis
Level III Between papillary dermis and reticular dermis
Level IV Infiltrating the reticular dermis
Level V Infiltrating subcutaneous tissue

Staging of Melanoma

Stage 0: Melanoma in Situ, 100% Survival

  • Tis (Clark Level I)

Stage I: Invasive Melanoma, 85-95% Survival

  • T1a (Clark Level II-III)
  • T1b (Clark Level IV-V)
  • T2a

Stage II: High Risk Melanoma, 40-85% Survival

  • T2b
  • T3a
  • T3b
  • T4a
  • T4b

Stage III: Regional Metastasis, 25-60% Survival

  • N1
  • N2
  • N3

Stage IV: Distant Metastasis, 9-15% Survival

  • M1a
  • M1b
  • M1c

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Coit DG, Andtbacka R, Anker CJ, Bichakjian CK, Carson WE, Daud A; et al. (2013). "Melanoma, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines". J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 11 (4): 395–407. PMID 23584343.
  2. Scolyer RA, Judge MJ, Evans A, Frishberg DP, Prieto VG, Thompson JF, Trotter MJ, Walsh MY, Walsh NM, Ellis DW (December 2013). "Data set for pathology reporting of cutaneous invasive melanoma: recommendations from the international collaboration on cancer reporting (ICCR)". Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 37 (12): 1797–814. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31829d7f35. PMC 3864181. PMID 24061524.
  3. Ge L, Vilain RE, Lo S, Aivazian K, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF (August 2016). "Breslow Thickness Measurements of Melanomas Around American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Cut-Off Points: Imprecision and Terminal Digit Bias Have Important Implications for Staging and Patient Management". Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23 (8): 2658–63. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5196-1. PMID 27075324.
  4. Patrick RJ, Corey S, Glass LF (November 2007). "The use of sequential serial sectioning of thin melanomas in determining maximum Breslow depth". J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 57 (5 Suppl): S127–8. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.02.007. PMID 17938027.
  5. Amin, Mahul (2017). AJCC cancer staging manual. Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 9783319406176.
  6. Amin, Mahul (2017). AJCC cancer staging manual. Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 9783319406176.
  7. Amin, Mahul (2017). AJCC cancer staging manual. Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 9783319406176.
  8. Clark WH, Elder DE, Guerry D, Braitman LE, Trock BJ, Schultz D; et al. (1989). "Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression". J Natl Cancer Inst. 81 (24): 1893–904. PMID 2593166.