Lymphadenopathy overview

Revision as of 19:36, 4 February 2021 by Delband Yekta Moazami (talk | contribs) (→‎Pathophysiology)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lymphadenopathy


Lymphadenopathy Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Lymphadenopathy from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT scan

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Lymphadenopathy overview On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Lymphadenopathy overview

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Lymphadenopathy overview

CDC on Lymphadenopathy overview

Lymphadenopathy overview in the news

Blogs on Lymphadenopathy overview

Directions to Hospitals Treating Lymphadenopathy

Risk calculators and risk factors for Lymphadenopathy overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Amandeep Singh M.D.[2],, Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3]Delband Yekta Moazami, M.D.[4]

Overview

Lymphadenopathy (also known as "enlarged lymph nodes") refers to lymph nodes which are abnormal in size, number, or consistency. Common causes of lymphadenopathy are infection, autoimmune disease, or malignancy. Lymphadenopathy may be classified according to distribution into 2 groups: generalized lymphadenopathy and localized lymphadenopathy. The pathogenesis of lymphadenopathy is characterized by the inflammation of lymph nodes. This process is primarily due to an elevated rate of trafficking of lymphocytes into the node from the blood, exceeding the rate of outflow from the node. Lymph nodes may also be enlarged secondarily as a result of the activation and proliferation of antigen-specific T and B cells (clonal expansion). Lymphadenopathy is very common, the estimated incidence of lymphadenopathy among children in the United States ranges from 35%- 45%. Patients of all age groups may develop lymphadenopathy. Lymphadenopathy is more commonly observed among children. Common complications of lymphadenopathy, may include: abscess formation, superior vena cava syndrome, and intestinal obstruction. Diagnostic criteria for malignant lymphadenopathy, may include: node > 2 cm, node that is draining, hard, or fixed to underlying tissue, atypical location (e.g. supraclavicular node), associated risk factors (e.g. HIV or TB), fever and/or weight loss, and splenomegaly. On the other hand, diagnostic criteria for benign lymphadenopathy, may include: node < 1 cm, node that is mobile, soft-or tender, and is not fixed to underlying tissue, typical location (e.g. supraclavicular node), no associated risk factors, and palpable and painful enlargement. Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy may include elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), mild neutropenia, and leukocytosis. There is no treatment for lymphadenopathy; the mainstay of therapy is treating the underlying condition.

Historical Perspective

Classification

Lymphadenopathy may be classified according to distribution into 2 groups localized lymphadenopathy and generalized lymphadenopathy. Lymphadenopathy may be classified as follows:

Pathophysiology

Lymph nodes are part of the immune system. As such, they are most readily palpable when fighting infections. Infections can either originate from the organs that they drain or primarily within the lymph node itself, referred to as lymphadenitis.*The pathogenesis of lymphadenopathy is characterized by the inflammation of lymph nodes. This process is primarily due to an elevated rate of trafficking of lymphocytes into the node from the blood, exceeding the rate of outflow from the node.

  • The immune response between the antigen and lymphocyte that leads to cellular proliferation and enlargement of the lymph nodes.
  • Lymph nodes may also be enlarged secondarily as a result of the activation and proliferation of antigen-specific T and B cells (clonal expansion).
  • On gross pathology, characteristic findings of lymphadenopathy, include:
  • Enlarged lymph node
  • Soft greasy yellow areas within the capsule

Lymph nodes are a part of the reticuloendothelial (RES) system, which includes lymphatic vessels, the lymphatic fluid found in interstitial fluid, monocytes of the blood, macrophages of the connective tissue, bone marrow, thymus, spleen, bone, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) of visceral organs Lymphatic fluid moves throughout the lymphatic system and enters lymph nodes for filtration of foreign antigen. Foreign antigens are presented to the lymphoid cells, which lead to cellular proliferation and enlargement. Under microscopy, cellular proliferation in lymphoid follicles may be identified as several mitotic figures. Increased activity leads to stretching of the lymphatic capsule and this may cause localized tenderness.

The development of B-cells originates from pluripotent stem cells from the bone marrow. B cells that successfully build their immunoglobulin heavy chains migrate to the germinal centers to allow for antibody diversification by somatic hypermutation. The current school of thought is that B-cell lymphomas occur as a result of alternations in chromosomal translocations and somatic hypermutation.

T-cell development also begins from pluripotent stem cells, which mature within the thymic cortex. While they are in the thymic cortex, specific rearrangements occur at the T-cell receptor. It is understood that chromosomal translocations at the level of T-cell receptors lead to T-cell lymphomagenesis.

Lymph nodes follicle necrosis may occur due to inflammatory, infectious, or malignant conditions. The neutrophil-rich infiltrates suggests bacterial infection, while lymphocyte-rich predominance may suggest viral infection. However, clinicians must remember that etiologies may vary; lymphomas, leukemias, tuberculosis, or even systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be more appropriate diagnoses in the appropriate clinical context

Causes

The most common causes of lymphadenopathy include infections, cancers, and connective tissue disorders. Lymph node enlargement can be of viral, bacterial, malignant, protozoan origin and can even be caused by live vaccines Examples of infections that can cause lymph node enlargement include:

as well HHV8 and HIV.

Examples of malignancies that cause lymphadenopathy are:

Autoimmune causes include: systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis may have generalized lymphadenopathy.

Benign lymphadenopathy

Examples include:

Axillary lymphadenopathy can be defined as solid nodes measuring more than 15  mm without fatty hilum. Axillary lymph nodes may be normal up to 30  mm if consisting largely of fat.

In children, a short axis of 8  mm can be used. However, inguinal lymph nodes of up to 15  mm and cervical lymph nodes of up to 20  mm are generally normal in children up to age 8–12.

Lymphadenopathy of more than 1.5  cm - 2  cm increases the risk of cancer or granulomatous disease as the cause rather than only inflammation or infection. Still, increasing size and persistence over time are more indicative of cancer.

Differentiating Lymphadenopathy from Other Diseases

Lymphadenopathy must be differentiated from syphilis, which may present as fever, myalgias, weight loss, and lymph node enlargement. After a thorough history and physical examination, lymphadenopathy can be initially categorized as:

Diagnostic: wherein the practitioner has a proximal cause for the lymph nodes and can go on to treat them. Examples would be Strep pharyngitis or localized cellulitis. The lymphadenopathy pattern history and physical examination can be suggestive an example would be mononucleosis wearing the practitioner has a strong clinic index of suspicion can perform a confirmatory test which if positive he can go on and treat the patient.

Unexplained lymphadenopathy. Unexplained lymphadenopathy can be generalized into localized or generalized lymphadenopathy. Unexplained localized lymphadenopathy is further divided into patterns at no risk for malignancy or severe illness in which case the patient can be observed for 3 to 4 weeks and if a response or improvement can be followed. The other alternative is if the patient is found to have a risk formalignancy or serious illness biopsy is indicated

Unexplained generalized lymphadenopathy can be approached after a review of epidemiological clues and medications with initial testing with a CBC with manual differential and mononucleosis serology if either is positive and diagnostic proceed to treatment. If both are negative, the second workup approach would be a PPD, and RPR, a chest x-ray, and ANA, hepatitis BS antigen serology and HIV. Additional testing modalities and lab tests may be indicated depending on clinical cues. If the results of this testing are conclusive, the practitioner can proceed on to diagnosis and treatment of the illness. If the results of the testing are still not clear, proceed to biopsy of the most abnormal of the nodes. The most functional way to investigate the differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy is to characterize it by node pattern and location, obtained pertinent history including careful evaluation of epidemiology, and place the patient in the appropriate arm of the algorithm to evaluate lymphadenopathy.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The estimated incidence of lymphadenopathy in children in the United States ranges from 35%- 45%. It is more common in the pediatric population. Race and gender have no predilection in lymphadenopathy incidence. Generalities can safely be made about the epidemiology of lymphadenopathy. First, both generalized and localized lymphadenopathies are fairly equally distributed without regard to gender. Second, lymphadenopathy is more prevalent in the pediatric population than in the adult population secondary to the greater number of viral infections. It would follow that the majority of the time, lymphadenopathy in the pediatric population is of less consequence again secondary to the prevalence of viral and bacterial infections in that age group. Three-quarters of all lymphadenopathy observed are localized, and of those three-quarters, half of these are localized to the head and neck area. All remaining localized lymphadenopathy is found in the inguinal area and the remaining lymphadenopathy is found in the axilla in the supraclavicular area. Of note, the differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy changes significantly with the age of the patient. Third, the patient's location and circumstance are very revealing and lymphadenopathy. For example, in the developing world (sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, Indian subcontinent), exposure to parasites, HIV, and miliary TB are far more likely to be causes of generalized lymphadenopathy than in the United States and Europe. Whereas, Epstein-Barr virus, streptococcal pharyngitis, and some neoplastic processes are more likely candidates to cause lymphadenopathy in the United States and the remainder of the localized industrial world. An exposure history is very important for diagnosis. Exposure to blood and blood-borne products either through transfusion, unsafe sexual practices, intravenous drug abuse, or vocation Exposure to infectious disease whether it be travel, in the workplace, or the home Medication exposure-prescription, nonprescription, or supplements Exposure to animal-borne illness either via pets or the workplace Exposure to arthropod bites

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of lymphadenopathy may be occupational, environmental, genetic, and viral.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for lymphadenopathy

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

The natural course of lymphadenopathy depends on the underlying cause. Lymphadenopathy due to infectious causes subsides once the infection is controlled. Common complications of lymphadenopathy depend on the site of involvement, e.g. mediastinal lymphadenopathy include compression symptoms likeTracheal and bronchial obstruction and Dysphagia in Superior vena cava syndrome. Prognosis is generally excellent for infectious causes. Prompt treatment with antibiotics usually leads to a complete recovery. However, it may take weeks, or even months, for swelling to disappear. The amount of time to recovery depends on the cause. Prognosis is poor for malignant tumors.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

Malignant Lymphadenopathy

Benign Lymphadenopathy

  • Node < 1 cm
  • Node that is mobile, soft-or tender, and is not fixed to underlying tissue
  • Common location (e.g. supraclavicular node)
  • No associated risk factors
  • Palpable and painful enlargement

History and Symptoms

The hallmark of lymphadenopathy is swollen lymph node. A positive history of a lump in the neck, red, tender skin over lymph node, and swollen, tender, or hard lymph nodes is suggestive of lymphadenopathy. The most common symptoms of lymphadenopathy include a lump in neck or affected part and constitutional symptoms like fatigue, fever, malaise, flu- like illness, nausea and vomiting, night sweats, weight loss, and cachexia.

Physical Examination

Common physical examination findings of lymphadenopathy include fever and tachycardia in infectious causes. There is an enlargement of different groups of lymph node chains depending upon the site of involvement and underlying causes.

Laboratory Findings

  • ANA: this is a screening test for SLE that can help establish it as a cause for generalized lymphadenopathy

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Chest X-ray can reveal tuberculosis, pulmonary sarcoidosis, and pulmonary neoplasm.

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

Ultrasound can help in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy to define the presence and extent of a lymph node abscess, to differentiate malignant lymph nodes from lymph node enlargement due to infections. On ultrasound, characteristic findings of lymphadenopathy, include increased lymph node size. In the assessment of number, size, form, marginal description, and internal structures in patients with lymphadenopathy, this imaging modality can be used. Furthermore, color Doppler ultrasonography is used to differentiate between older pre-existing lymphadenopathy and newly active lymphadenopathy in the vascular pattern.

CT scan

A Chest CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of hilar adenopathy. Findings on CT scan suggestive of/diagnostic of tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, lymphoma, and other malignancies. Abdominal and pelvic CT scan in combination with chest CT scan can be revealed in cases of supraclavicular adenopathy and the diagnosis of secondary neoplasm.

MRI

MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy. Findings on MRI suggestive of/diagnostic of lymphadenopathy include negative enhancement that is showed as decreased T1 and T2 signal intensity.

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment of lymphadenopathy is based on the etiology. Generally, treatment of lymphadenopathy is as follows:

  • If medication is the suspected cause, discontinue the medication if possible.

Medical Therapy

The medical therapy depends upon the underlying cause. Appropriate antibiotics are given for infective causes. Glucocorticoids for autoimmune conditions like sarcoidosis, and chemotherapy and radiation for malignant causes.

Surgery

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with lymphadenopathy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either malignancy and an indication of biopsy. It involves the removal or aspiration of lymph nodes. They are dissected when cancer is in an advanced stage.

Primary Prevention

Good general health and hygiene are helpful in the prevention of any infection.

Secondary Prevention

Effective measures for the secondary prevention of lymphadenopathy include sentinel lymph node biopsy and early treatment if metastasis is detected.

References

References

Template:WH Template:WS