Lymphadenopathy

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lymphadenopathy Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Lymphadenopathy from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT scan

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Lymphadenopathy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Lymphadenopathy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Lymphadenopathy

CDC on Lymphadenopathy

Lymphadenopathy in the news

Blogs on Lymphadenopathy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Lymphadenopathy

Risk calculators and risk factors for Lymphadenopathy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Shyam Patel [2] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3] Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [4]

Synonyms and keywords: Lymph nodes enlarged; Enlarged lymph nodes; Lymphadenitis; Swollen lymph nodes; Swollen/enlarged lymph nodes

Overview

Lymphadenopathy (also known as "enlarged lymph nodes") refers to lymph nodes which are abnormal in size, number or consistency. Common causes of lymphadenopathy are infection, autoimmune disease, or malignancy. Lymphadenopathy may be classified according to distribution into 2 groups: generalized lymphadenopathy and localized lymphadenopathy. The pathogenesis of lymphadenopathy is characterized by the inflammation of lymph nodes. This process is primarily due to an elevated rate of trafficking of lymphocytes into the node from the blood, exceeding the rate of outflow from the node. Lymph nodes may also be enlarged secondarily as a result of the activation and proliferation of antigen-specific T and B cells (clonal expansion). Lymphadenopathy is very common, the estimated incidence of lymphadenopathy among children in the United States ranges from 35%- 45%. Patients of all age groups may develop lymphadenopathy. Lymphadenopathy is more commonly observed among children. Common complications of lymphadenopathy, may include: abscess formation, superior vena cava syndrome, and intestinal obstruction. Diagnostic criteria for malignant lymphadenopathy, may include: node > 2 cm, node that is draining, hard, or fixed to underlying tissue, atypical location (e.g. supraclavicular node), associated risk factors (e.g. HIV or TB), fever and/or weight loss, and splenomegaly. On the other hand, diagnostic criteria for benign lymphadenopathy, may include: node < 1 cm, node that is mobile, soft-or tender, and is not fixed to underlying tissue, typical location (e.g. supraclavicular node), no associated risk factors, and palpable and painful enlargement. Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy, may include: elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), mild neutropenia, and leukocytosis. There is no treatment for lymphadenopathy; the mainstay of therapy is treating the underlying condition.

Classification

  • Lymphadenopathy may be classified according to distribution into 2 groups:[1][2]
  • Generalized lymphadenopathy
  • Localized lymphadenopathy

Pathophysiology

  • The pathogenesis of lymphadenopathy is characterized by the inflammation of lymph nodes. This process is primarily due to an elevated rate of trafficking of lymphocytes into the node from the blood, exceeding the rate of outflow from the node.[1]
  • The inmune response between the antigen and lymphocyte that leads to cellular proliferation and enlargement of the lymph nodes.
  • Lymph nodes may also be enlarged secondarily as a result of the activation and proliferation of antigen-specific T and B cells (clonal expansion).
  • On gross pathology, characteristic findings of lymphadenopathy, include:
  • Enlarged lymph node
  • Soft greasy yellow areas within capsule
  • On microscopic histopathological analysis, characteristic findings of lymphadenopathy will depend on the aetiology.
  • Common findings, include:[1][2]

Non-specific reactive follicular hyperplasia (NSRFH)

  • Large spaced cortical follicles
  • Tingible body macrophages, normal dark/light GC pattern

Lymph node metastasis

  • Foreign cell population (usually in subcapsular sinuses)
  • +/-nuclear atypia
  • +/-malignant architecture

Toxoplasmosis

  • Large follicles
  • Epithelioid cells perifollicular & intrafollicular
  • Reactive GCs
  • Monocytoid cell clusters

Cat-scratch disease

  • PMNs in necrotic area
  • "Stellate" (or serpentine) shaped micro-abscesses
  • Presence of granulomas

Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy

  • Melanin-laden histiocytes
  • Histiocytosis

Systemic lupus erythematosus lymphadenopathy

  • Blue hematoxylin bodies
  • Necrosis
  • No PMNs

Causes

Differentiating Lymphadenopathy from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

  • The most common risk factors in the development of lymphadenopathy, include:

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

  • Patients with lymphadenopathy may be symptomatic or asymptomatic, depending on the aetiology.[1]
  • Early clinical features include palpable tenderness, pain, and fever.[2]
  • Common complications of lymphadenopathy, include:[2]

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy

Abdominal lymphadenopathy

Superficial lymphadenopathy

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

Malignant Lymphadenopathy

Benign Lymphadenopathy

  • Node < 1 cm
  • Node that is mobile, soft-or tender, and is not fixed to underlying tissue
  • Common location (e.g. supraclavicular node)
  • No associated risk factors
  • Palpable and painful enlargement

Symptoms

  • Symptoms of lymphadenopathy may include the following:[1][2]
  • Constitutional symptoms
  • A directed history should be obtained to ascertain:[1][2]
  • Use of drugs causing lymphadenopathy
  • Travel to endemic areas
  • Occupational risk (e.g. Fishermen, slaughterhouse workers, hunters, trappers)
  • High risk behavior or high risk sexual behaviors (e.g. I.V drug abuse, multiple partners)

Physical Examination

  • Patients with lymphadenopathy may have a pale or normal appearance.
  • Physical examination may be remarkable for:

Vitals

  • Temperature

Skin

  • Rash may be present
  • Color change (indicative of inflammation)
  • Skin fistula draining pus may be present
  • Ulcers

Head

Palpating Anterior Cervical Lymph Nodes

Lymph nodes should be examined in the following order:[1][2]

Characteristics to be noted while palpating lymph nodes:[2]

  • Size
  • Pain/ tenderness
  • Increased tenderness (e.g infected lymph nodes)
  • Consistency
  • Matting

Gallery

Laboratory Findings

  • Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy, may include:[1][2]

Complete Blood Count

Imaging Findings

Ultrasonography

  • On ultrasound, characteristic findings of lymphadenopathy, include:[1][4][2]
  • Increased lymph node size

CT

  • Most nodes: 10 mm in short-axis
  • Sub-mental and sub-mandibular: 15 mm
  • Retropharyngeal: 8 mm
  • Loss of fatty hilum
  • Focal necrosis
  • Cystic necrotic nodes
  • Long-to-short axis ratio (>2cm - usually benign)
  • The upper limit in size of a normal node varies with location.

PET/CT

  • On PET/CT, lymphadenopathy can be further assessed via quantitation of FDG uptake, which is a surrogate of metabolic activity. Infectious, inflammatory, and neoplastic processes will show high FDG avidity on PET/CT. PET/CT is particularly useful for assessing response of lymph nodes to systemic chemotherapy.

MRI

  • MRI is the most anatomically precise test for assessing lymphadenopathy. MRI is particularly useful for intraabdominal lymphadenopathy, which cannot be readily palpated via physical examination. MRI is more expensive than CT scan, so CT is preferred in general unless the clinical need for MRI arises.

Treatment

  • There is no treatment for lymphadenopathy; the mainstay of therapy is treating the underlying condition.[1]
    • Infectious lymphadenopathy responds well to prompt treatment with antibiotics, and usually leads to a complete recovery. However, it may take months, for swelling to disappear. The amount of time to recovery depends on the cause.[2]
    • Neoplastic (malignant) lymphadenopathy usually responds well to systemic chemotherapy.

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 Mohseni S, Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, Alinejad S, Ghorbani A, Ghafouri A (2014). "Peripheral lymphadenopathy: approach and diagnostic tools". Iran J Med Sci. 39 (2 Suppl): 158–70. PMC 3993046. PMID 24753638.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Lymph node enlargment. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lymph_node Accessed on May 9, 2016
  3. Deschenes J, Seamone CD, Baines MG (1992). "Acquired ocular syphilis: diagnosis and treatment". Ann Ophthalmol. 24 (4): 134–8. PMID 1590633.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lymph node enlargment. Radiopedia. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/lymph-node-enlargement Accessed on May 9, 2016
  5. van den Brekel MW, Castelijns JA (January 2000). "Imaging of lymph nodes in the neck". Semin Roentgenol. 35 (1): 42–53. PMID 10670052.
  6. Sumi M, Ohki M, Nakamura T (April 2001). "Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck". AJR Am J Roentgenol. 176 (4): 1019–24. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.4.1761019. PMID 11264102.



Template:WikiDoc Sources