Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hepatocellular adenoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Hepatocellular adenoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective

CDC on Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective

Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Hepatocellular adenoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Hepatocellular adenoma historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nawal Muazam M.D.[2]

Overview

Hepatocellular adenoma was first discovered by Hugh A. Edmondson in 1958 following 50,000 autopsies.[1]

Historical perspective

  • In 1958, the hepatocellular adenoma was first described by Edmondson as an encapsulated liver tumor that does not contain bile ducts, when he identified two such lesions in 50,000 autopsies.[2]
  • In 1973, Baum reported the important relationship between oral contraceptive use and development of hepatocellular adenomas in seven patients.[3][4]
  • In 1970s several subsequent case series supported the hypothesis of an association between the oral contraceptive pill and hepatocellular adenomas.[5]
  • In 1976, Edmondson published a case control study giving further evidence of this association. [6]

References

  1. Barthelmes L, Tait IS (2005). "Liver cell adenoma and liver cell adenomatosis". HPB (Oxford). 7 (3): 186–96. doi:10.1080/13651820510028954. PMC 2023950. PMID 18333188.
  2. Barthelmes L, Tait IS (2005). "Liver cell adenoma and liver cell adenomatosis". HPB (Oxford). 7 (3): 186–96. doi:10.1080/13651820510028954. PMC 2023950. PMID 18333188.
  3. G. Klatskin (1977). "Hepatic tumors: possible relationship to use of oral contraceptives". Gastroenterology. 73 (2): 386–394. PMID 194813. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. J. K. Baum, J. J. Bookstein, F. Holtz & E. W. Klein (1973). "Possible association between benign hepatomas and oral contraceptives". Lancet (London, England). 2 (7835): 926–929. PMID 4126557. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. E. Horvath, K. Kovacs & R. C. Ross (1974). "Letter: Benign hepatoma in a young woman on contraceptive steroids". Lancet (London, England). 1 (7853): 357–358. PMID 4131203. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. H. A. Edmondson, B. Henderson & B. Benton (1976). "Liver-cell adenomas associated with use of oral contraceptives". The New England journal of medicine. 294 (9): 470–472. doi:10.1056/NEJM197602262940904. PMID 173996. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)


Template:WikiDoc Sources