Ewing's sarcoma natural history: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
'''Gender''':
'''Gender''':
*Girls with Ewing sarcoma have a better prognosis than do boys with Ewing sarcoma.
*Girls with Ewing sarcoma have a better prognosis than do boys with Ewing sarcoma.
'''Serum LDH''':  
'''Serum LDH''':  
*Increased serum LDH levels before treatment are associated with poor prognosis.
*Increased serum LDH levels before treatment are associated with poor prognosis.
Line 41: Line 40:
*Based on an analysis from the SEER database, regional lymph node involvement in patients is associated with an inferior overall outcome when compared with patients without regional lymph node involvement.
*Based on an analysis from the SEER database, regional lymph node involvement in patients is associated with an inferior overall outcome when compared with patients without regional lymph node involvement.
'''Previous treatment for cancer''':
'''Previous treatment for cancer''':
*In the SEER database, 58 patients with Ewing sarcoma who were diagnosed after treatment for a previous malignancy (2.1% of patients with Ewing sarcoma) were compared with 2,756 patients with Ewing sarcoma as a first cancer over the same period. Patients with Ewing sarcoma as a second malignant neoplasm were older (secondary Ewing sarcoma, mean age of 47.8 years; primary Ewing sarcoma, mean age of 22.5 years), more likely to have a primary tumor in an axial or extraskeletal site, and had a worse prognosis (5-year OS for patients with secondary Ewing sarcoma, 43.5%; patients with primary Ewing sarcoma, 64.2%).[37]
*Patients with Ewing sarcoma as a second malignant neoplasm were older (secondary Ewing sarcoma, mean age of 47.8 years; primary Ewing sarcoma, mean age of 22.5 years), more likely to have a primary tumor in an axial or extraskeletal site, and had a worse prognosis (5-year OS for patients with secondary Ewing sarcoma, 43.5%; patients with primary Ewing sarcoma, 64.2%).
Standard cytogenetics: Complex karyotype (defined as the presence of five or more independent chromosome abnormalities at diagnosis) and modal chromosome numbers lower than 50 appear to have adverse prognostic significance.[38]
'''Standard cytogenetics''':
Detectable fusion transcripts in morphologically normal marrow: Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction can be used to detect fusion transcripts in bone marrow. In a single retrospective study utilizing patients with normal marrow morphology and no other metastatic site, fusion transcript detection in marrow or peripheral blood was associated with an increased risk of relapse.[39]
*Complex karyotype (defined as the presence of five or more independent chromosome abnormalities at diagnosis) and modal chromosome numbers lower than 50 appear to have adverse prognostic significance.
Other biological factors: Overexpression of the p53 protein, Ki67 expression, and loss of 16q may be adverse prognostic factors.[40-42] High expression of microsomal glutathione S-transferase, an enzyme associated with resistance to doxorubicin, is associated with inferior outcome for Ewing sarcoma.[43]
'''Detectable fusion transcripts in morphologically normal marrow''':
 
*Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction can be used to detect fusion transcripts in bone marrow. Fusion transcript detection in marrow or peripheral blood was associated with an increased risk of relapse.
The Children's Oncology Group performed a prospective analysis of TP53 mutations and/or CDKN2A deletions in patients with Ewing sarcoma; no correlation was found with event-free survival (EFS).[44]
 
The following are not considered to be adverse prognostic factors for Ewing sarcoma:
 
Pathologic fracture: Pathologic fractures do not appear to be a prognostic factor.[45]
Histopathology: The degree of neural differentiation is not a prognostic factor in Ewing sarcoma.[46,47]
Molecular pathology: The EWSR1-ETS translocation associated with Ewing sarcoma can occur at several potential breakpoints in each of the genes that join to form the novel segment of DNA. Once thought to be significant,[48] two large series have shown that the EWSR1-ETS translocation breakpoint site is not an adverse prognostic factor.[49,50]


Response to initial therapy factors
'''Other biological factors''':
*Over expression of the p53 protein, Ki67 expression, and loss of 16q may be adverse prognostic factors.
*High expression of microsomal glutathione S-transferase, an enzyme associated with resistance to doxorubicin, is associated with inferior outcome for Ewing sarcoma.


Multiple studies have shown that patients with minimal or no residual viable tumor after presurgical chemotherapy have a significantly better EFS than do patients with larger amounts of viable tumor.[51-54] Female gender and younger age predict a good histologic response to preoperative therapy.[55] For patients who receive preinduction- and postinduction-chemotherapy PET scans, decreased PET uptake after chemotherapy correlated with good histologic response and better outcome.[56,57]
*Response to initial therapy factors:
Multiple studies have shown that patients with minimal or no residual viable tumor after presurgical chemotherapy have a significantly better EFS than do patients with larger amounts of viable tumor. Female gender and younger age predict a good histologic response to preoperative therapy. For patients who receive preinduction- and postinduction-chemotherapy PET scans, decreased PET uptake after chemotherapy correlated with good histologic response and better outcome.


Patients with poor response to presurgical chemotherapy have an increased risk for local recurrence.[58]
==Complications==
==Complications==
* The treatments needed to fight this disease have many complications, which should be discussed on an individual basis.
* The treatments needed to fight this disease have many complications, which should be discussed on an individual basis.

Revision as of 15:16, 2 October 2015

Ewing's sarcoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Ewing's sarcoma from other diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Biopsy

X Ray

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Ewing's sarcoma natural history On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Ewing's sarcoma natural history

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Ewing's sarcoma natural history

CDC on Ewing's sarcoma natural history

Ewing's sarcoma natural history in the news

Blogs on Ewing's sarcoma natural history

Directions to Hospitals Treating Ewing's sarcoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Ewing's sarcoma natural history

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Michael Maddaleni, B.S.

Prognosis

  • Out of all primary musculoskeletal tumors, Ewing's Sarcoma has maintained the form with the most unfavorable long term prognosis.[1] In fact, prior to multi-drug chemotherapy, the survival rate was less than 10%. Now that there have been many options developed, such as chemotherapy, surgery, and irradiation, long term survival has increased to greater than 50% in most clinical centers.[1]
  • Staging attempts to distinguish patients with localized from those with metastatic disease. Most commonly, metastases occur in the chest, bone and/or bone marrow. Less common sites include the central nervous system and lymph nodes.
  • Survival for localized disease is 65-70% when treated with chemotherapy. Long term survival for metastatic disease can be less than 10% but some sources state it is 25-30%.

The two major types of prognostic factors for patients with Ewing sarcoma are grouped as follows:

  • Pretreatment factors.
  • Response to initial therapy factors.
  • Pretreatment factors:

Site of tumor:

  • Patients with Ewing sarcoma in the distal extremities have the best prognosis.
  • Patients with Ewing sarcoma in the proximal extremities have an intermediate prognosis, followed by patients with central or pelvic sites.

Tumor size or volume:

  • Tumor size or volume has been shown to be an important prognostic factor in most studies.
  • Cutoffs of a volume of 100 mL or 200 mL and/or single dimension greater than 8 cm are used to define larger tumors
  • Larger tumors tend to occur in unfavorable sites.

Age:

  • Infants and younger patients have a better prognosis than do patients aged 15 years and older.
  • Review of the SEER database from 1973 to 2011 identified 1,957 patients with Ewing sarcoma. Thirty-nine of these patients (2.0%) were younger than 12 months at diagnosis. Infants were less likely to receive radiation therapy and more likely to have soft tissue primary sites.
  • Early death was more common in infants, but the overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly from that of older patients.

Gender:

  • Girls with Ewing sarcoma have a better prognosis than do boys with Ewing sarcoma.

Serum LDH:

  • Increased serum LDH levels before treatment are associated with poor prognosis.
  • Increased LDH levels are also correlated with large primary tumors and metastatic disease.

Metastases:

  • Any metastatic disease defined by standard imaging techniques or bone marrow aspirate/biopsy by morphology is an adverse prognostic factor.
  • The presence or absence of metastatic disease is the single most powerful predictor of outcome.
  • Patients with metastatic disease confined to the lung have a better prognosis than do patients with extra pulmonary metastatic sites.
  • The number of pulmonary lesions does not seem to correlate with outcome, but patients with unilateral lung involvement do better than patients with bilateral lung involvement.
  • Patients with metastasis to only bone seem to have a better outcome than do patients with metastases to both bone and lung.
  • Based on an analysis from the SEER database, regional lymph node involvement in patients is associated with an inferior overall outcome when compared with patients without regional lymph node involvement.

Previous treatment for cancer:

  • Patients with Ewing sarcoma as a second malignant neoplasm were older (secondary Ewing sarcoma, mean age of 47.8 years; primary Ewing sarcoma, mean age of 22.5 years), more likely to have a primary tumor in an axial or extraskeletal site, and had a worse prognosis (5-year OS for patients with secondary Ewing sarcoma, 43.5%; patients with primary Ewing sarcoma, 64.2%).

Standard cytogenetics:

  • Complex karyotype (defined as the presence of five or more independent chromosome abnormalities at diagnosis) and modal chromosome numbers lower than 50 appear to have adverse prognostic significance.

Detectable fusion transcripts in morphologically normal marrow:

  • Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction can be used to detect fusion transcripts in bone marrow. Fusion transcript detection in marrow or peripheral blood was associated with an increased risk of relapse.

Other biological factors:

  • Over expression of the p53 protein, Ki67 expression, and loss of 16q may be adverse prognostic factors.
  • High expression of microsomal glutathione S-transferase, an enzyme associated with resistance to doxorubicin, is associated with inferior outcome for Ewing sarcoma.
  • Response to initial therapy factors:

Multiple studies have shown that patients with minimal or no residual viable tumor after presurgical chemotherapy have a significantly better EFS than do patients with larger amounts of viable tumor. Female gender and younger age predict a good histologic response to preoperative therapy. For patients who receive preinduction- and postinduction-chemotherapy PET scans, decreased PET uptake after chemotherapy correlated with good histologic response and better outcome.

Complications

  • The treatments needed to fight this disease have many complications, which should be discussed on an individual basis.
  • Approximately 25% of patients with Ewing sarcoma have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Iwamoto Y (2007). "Diagnosis and treatment of Ewing's sarcoma". Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37 (2): 79–89. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyl142. PMID 17272319. Retrieved 2011-12-09. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WH Template:WS