Eclampsia historical perspective

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Eclampsia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Differentiating Eclampsia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Eclampsia historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Eclampsia historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Eclampsia historical perspective

CDC on Eclampsia historical perspective

Eclampsia historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Eclampsia historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Eclampsia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Eclampsia historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]


Overview

Importance of Historical Perspective

The importance of historical perspective lies in the fact that our current understanding of pathophysiology, classifications and management strategies is influenced by past hypotheses and scientific contributions, which have also shaped our current practice trends. [1]

Origin

The term is derived from Greek and refers to a flash, a term used by Hippocrates to designate a fever of sudden onset.[2]

Historical Perspective

Over time various theories and treatments based on those theories have been proposed.

Ancient Times

Theories

  • THEORY OF FOUR HUMORS
    • In late 5thand early 4th BCE
    • The balance between Four humors, blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile, resulted in health and illness.[3]
  • WET AND DRY THEORY
    • Women’s skin was considered wet, porous, and soft and it was thought that she could accumulate lots of moisture which resulted in an overabundance of fluids and led to illness. [4]
  • WANDERING WOMB THEORY
    • Hippocrates believed that dried up uterus wandered the body in search of moisture, and as it wandered the body, it could wreak havoc upon the liver, spleen, lungs, and head, leading to disease.

Treatments Offered

Treatment directed towards the restoration of internal equilibrium by mechanisms that increased elimination of excess fluids and could consist of:

  • Altered diets
  • Purging
  • Blood-letting

Middle Ages

During the middle ages, between 400 CE and 700 CE, scientific progress, especially medical, came to a standstill as the Christians were opposed to human science and dissection. many medical schools were closed, such as at Athens and Alexandria. Hence, the main focus was on the compilation and rewriting. Later, the Christian influence began to decline and new theories emerged. In 1619, the word "eclampsia" first appeared in Varandaeus' treatise on gynecology.[5]

Theories

  • DOMINANT HUMOR THEORY
    • One theory that emerged suggested that one humor dominated the other humors and controlled an individual's physical and emotional characteristics, and was responsible for the signs and symptoms of eclampsia.
  • MAURICEAU'S THEORY
    • In 17th century, when medicine gained momentum again, Francois Mauriceau helped establish obstetrics as a specialty. He was the first to systematically describe eclampsia,[6] and to note that primigravidas were at a greater risk for convulsions compared to multigravidas. He attributed convulsions to either suppressed lochia flow which could lead to inflammation, pain in the head, convulsions, suffocation, and death, or intrauterine fetal death which could lead to foul-smelling humors and predispose a woman to convulsions.

Treatments Offered

Increasing Christian beliefs greatly influenced treatments which consisted of charms, amulets, prayers. However, as time passed treatments offered in ancients times were again practiced, such as phlebotomies.

18th and 19th Century

Theories

  • In the 18th century, Bossier de Sauvages discerned eclampsia from epilepsy and believed that convulsions transpired due to nature trying to free the morbid elements from the organism. [7][1]
  • In the 19th century physicians continued to propose more theories. Dr Thomas Denman(1821) in his work entitled "Introduction to the Practice of Midwifery", concentrated on labours affected by convulsions. He attributed convulsions to specific customs and behaviours analogous to living in big cities and towns but also noted that the largest risk came from the uterus. According to him, expansion of the uterus during pregnancy placed considerable pressure on the descending blood vessels, resulting in regurgitation of blood in the head and overload of cerebral blood vessels resulted in convulsions.[1]
  • Dr William Tyler Smith(1849) in his work, “Parturition and the Principles and Practice of Obstetrics” challenged Denman's theory of cerebral congestion. He believed that pregnancy was a state of increased fullness in Circulation. Dr Smith noted that if cerebral congestion was the cause of seizures more cases would be observed during the second stage of labor as contractions during the second stage would interfere the most with the circulation of blood. He proposed other causes such as:
    • mechanical or emotional stimulus applied to the spinal cord
    • variations in the wind, temperature, other atmospheric changes
    • bloodletting
    • irritation of the uterus, uterine passages, intestinal canal, and the stomach
    • the toxic elements
      • SMITH'S THEORY OF TOXIC ELEMENTS: Dr Smith believed that the health of the pregnant woman depended on the exponential increase in the elimination of the waste elements, such as secretion of the bowels, and debris from the maternal and feal system. Failure to eliminate such wastes could result in "toxemia", in which morbid elements accumulate in the system and could irritate the nervous system.

Treatments Offered

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Bell MJ (2010). "A historical overview of preeclampsia-eclampsia". J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 39 (5): 510–8. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01172.x. PMC 2951301. PMID 20919997.
  2. Chesley LC. Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy, in Williams Obstetrics, 14th Edition. Appleton Century Crofts, New York (1971), page 700.
  3. Demand N. Birth, death, and motherhood in classical Greece. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Green MH. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Princeton University; 1985. The transmission of ancient theories of female physiology and disease through the early Middle Ages.
  5. Ong,2004
  6. McMillen (2003)
  7. temkin,1917

Template:WH Template:WS