Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
m (Changes made per Mahshid's request)
Line 23: Line 23:
[[Category:Hematology]]
[[Category:Hematology]]
[[Category:Cardiology]]
[[Category:Cardiology]]
[[Category:Infectious disease]]
 


{{WS}}
{{WS}}
{{WH}}
{{WH}}

Revision as of 17:36, 18 September 2017

Disseminated intravascular coagulation Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Disseminated intravascular coagulation from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiograph and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings

CDC on Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings

Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Risk calculators and risk factors for Disseminated intravascular coagulation laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Laboratory findings

Although numerous blood tests are often performed on patients prone to DIC, the important measures are: full blood count (especially the platelet count), fibrin degradation products or D-dimer tests (markers of fibrinolysis), bleeding time and fibrinogen levels. Decreased platelets, elevated FDPs or D-dimers, prolonged bleeding time and decreased fibrinogen are markers of DIC. In general;

  • The diagnosis of DIC is suggested when the appropriate clinical picture (hemorrhage and thrombosis with end-organ dysfunction) is accompanied by lab evidence of procoagulant activation, fibrinolytic activation, and inhibitor consumption.
  • Thrombocytopenia is an almost universal finding.
  • The peripheral smear will reveal schistocytes and RBC (red blood cell) fragments in ~ 50%, and the absence of schistocytes does not rule out DIC. Most patients will have a mild reticulocytosis and leukocytosis, as well as thrombocytopenia with an increased population of young platelets (due to increased destruction and turnover). Pathologically, early signs include platelet-rich microthrombi, which are then replaced by fibrin-rich microthrombi.
  • Although one would think that the PT and PTT (prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time) should uniformly be elevated in DIC, this is not the case, with up to 50% of patients having normal values (due to higher circulating levels of clotting factors such as factor Xa and thrombin).
  • Fibrin and fibrinogen degradation products, however, are elevated in 80 – 100% of patients.
    • High FDPs, however, are not specific and can be elevated in any state associated with elevated plasmin levels such as PE/DVT (pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), liver or renal disease, in patients s/p (status post) surgery, and in women on oral contraceptives.
  • The D-dimer, however, is specific for the presence of fibrin degradation, and is thought to be more sensitive and specific for DIC.
  • Antithrombin levels have become a key test for diagnosing and monitoring therapy in DIC.
    • With thrombin activation, antithrombin is also activated, forming thrombin – antithrombin complexes --> reduced AT levels.
  • The main differential is TTP-HUS (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome), which is associated primarily with thrombocytopenia, and minimal effects on fibrin degradation.
    • The PT and PTT in TTP – HUS are therefore usually normal, and there is little evidence of fibrinolysis and inhibitor consumption.

References


Template:WS Template:WH