Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cyclosporiasis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Cyclosporiasis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X-Ray

CT Scan

MRI

Ultrasound

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

on Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Cyclosporiasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Laboratory Findings

Stool Examination

Wet Mount

In bright-field microscopy using differential interference contrast (DIC), oocysts appear as refractile spheres (8 to 10 μm) with a distinct oocyst wall, but may be confused with other objects. Under UV fluorescence microscopy, the oocyst wall autofluoresces. An intense blue fluorescence is obtained with the preferred UV excitation filter set (330 to 365 nm). If this filter set is not available, a less intense green fluorescence can be obtained with blue excitation (450 to 490 nm). Other objects, however, can also autofluoresce. A fluorescence microscope is required and this procedure does not provide a stained slide that can be archived.Both DIC and UV fluorescence microscopy are efficient and reliable approaches for identification of this coccidian. Objects found by UV microscopy should always be checked under DIC and vice versa.

Modified acid-fast stain

File:Acid fats stain 3.jpg A blue-green background, or contrasting counterstain, of fecal debris allows the oocysts to stand out. The oocysts are variably stained: some will stain light pink to deep purple, while others may be unstained. The oocysts (8 to 10 μm) may not be perfectly round; some may appear collapsed or distorted on one side. They may contain granules and/or have a wrinkled oocyst wall appearance (characteristics that distinguish oocysts from acid-fast artifacts). This staining method is the easiest and most practical, and provides a stained slide that can be archived. Misdiagnosis can result, however, due to the variability in staining and confusion with artifacts.

Safranin stain

Oocysts stain uniformly, red to reddish-orange. This uniform staining decreases the risk of misdiagnosis. However, this technique requires heating, therefore additional equipment is necessary (e.g., microwave oven).

Trichrome stain

Oocysts may be detected, but should not be confirmed, by this method. Because trichrome stain is the routine staining technique for stool specimens in most laboratories, laboratorians should be familiar with the appearance of Cyclospora stained with trichrome in order to detect oocysts during routine ex-aminations. However, this staining method is inadequate for definitive diagnosis because all oocysts will appear unstained. Oocysts appear as clear, round, and somewhat wrinkled spheres (8 to 10 μm). The diagnostic techniques listed above should be used to confirm Cyclospora when the presence of this coccidian is suspected in a trichrome stained smear.

External Link

http://www.dpd.cdc.gov/dpdx/HTML/PDF_Files/cyclospora_benchaid.pdf

References

Template:WH Template:WS