Premature ventricular contraction surgery

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Premature ventricular contraction Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Premature Ventricular Contraction from other Disorders

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Premature ventricular contraction surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Premature ventricular contraction surgery

CDC onPremature ventricular contraction surgery

Premature ventricular contraction surgery in the news

Blogs on Premature ventricular contraction surgery

to Hospitals Treating Premature ventricular contraction surgery

Risk calculators and risk factors for Premature ventricular contraction surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Homa Najafi, M.D.[2]


Overview

Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of [disease name].

OR

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with [disease name]. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either [indication 1], [indication 2], and [indication 3]

OR

The mainstay of treatment for [disease name] is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either [indication 1], [indication 2], and/or [indication 3].

OR

The feasibility of surgery depends on the stage of [malignancy] at diagnosis.

OR

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for [disease or malignancy].

Indications

  • Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of [disease name].

OR

  • Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with [disease name]. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either:
    • [Indication 1]
    • [Indication 2]
    • [Indication 3]
  • The mainstay of treatment for [disease name] is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either:
    • [Indication 1]
    • [Indication 2]
    • [Indication 3]

Surgery

  • The feasibility of surgery depends on the stage of [malignancy] at diagnosis.

OR

  • Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for [disease or malignancy].

Contraindications

2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death (DO NOT EDIT)[1]

Recommendations for Surgery and Revascularization Procedures in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease

Class I
1. In patients with VA symptoms associated with exertion, suspected ischemic heart disease, or catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, exercise treadmill testing is useful to assess for exercise-induced VA (Level of Evidence: B-NR).[2][3]

2. In patients with suspected or documented VA, a 12-lead ECG should be obtained in sinus rhythm to look for evidence of heart disease (Level of Evidence: B-NR).[4]

References

  1. Al-Khatib, Sana M.; Stevenson, William G.; Ackerman, Michael J.; Bryant, William J.; Callans, David J.; Curtis, Anne B.; Deal, Barbara J.; Dickfeld, Timm; Field, Michael E.; Fonarow, Gregg C.; Gillis, Anne M.; Granger, Christopher B.; Hammill, Stephen C.; Hlatky, Mark A.; Joglar, José A.; Kay, G. Neal; Matlock, Daniel D.; Myerburg, Robert J.; Page, Richard L. (2018). "2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death". Circulation. 138 (13). doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000549. ISSN 0009-7322.
  2. Elhendy, Abdou; Chandrasekaran, Krishnaswamy; Gersh, Bernard J; Mahoney, Douglas; Burger, Kelli N; Pellikka, Patricia A (2002). "Functional and prognostic significance of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with suspected coronary artery disease". The American Journal of Cardiology. 90 (2): 95–100. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02428-1. ISSN 0002-9149.
  3. Grady, Thomas A. (1998). "Prognostic Significance of Exercise-Induced Left Bundle-Branch Block". JAMA. 279 (2): 153. doi:10.1001/jama.279.2.153. ISSN 0098-7484.
  4. Pérez-Rodon, Jordi; Martínez-Alday, Jesus; Barón-Esquivias, Gonzalo; Martín, Alfonso; García-Civera, Roberto; del Arco, Carmen; Cano-Gonzalez, Alicia; Moya-Mitjans, Àngel (2014). "Prognostic value of the electrocardiogram in patients with syncope: Data from the Group for Syncope Study in the Emergency Room (GESINUR)". Heart Rhythm. 11 (11): 2035–2044. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.06.037. ISSN 1547-5271.

Template:WH Template:WS