Pericarditis MRI

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pericarditis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

HIV
Post MI
Dressler's syndrome
Post-pericardiotomy
Radiation
Tuberculosis
Uremia
Malignancy

Differentiating Pericarditis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Pericardial Effusion
Cardiac Tamponade
Constrictive Pericarditis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Pericardiocentesis
Pericardial Window
Pericardial Stripping

Treatment Related Videos

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pericarditis MRI On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Google Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pericarditis MRI

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pericarditis MRI

CDC on Pericarditis MRI

Pericarditis MRI in the news

Blogs on Pericarditis MRI

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pericarditis MRI

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

The Appearance of the Normal Pericardium on Cardiac MRI

The low water content pericardium appears as a thin dark band that is bordered by a bright band on both sides on T1 weighted spin imaging. These surrounding bright bands are associated with the surrounding epicardial and pericardial fat. The thickness of the normal pericardium is 2 to 4 mm.

The Appearance of the Inflamed Pericardium on Cardiac MRI

Following the administration of gadolinium the pericardium is enhanced due to inflammation.

The Appearance of the Pericardium in Constrictive Pericarditis

Pericardial thickening on cardiac MRI has become the diagnostic modality of choice in the assessment of constrictive pericarditis with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 100%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93%. The pericardium is of a lower intensity signal in constrictive pericarditis than in acute pericarditis.

Other signs of pericardial constriction on cardiac MRI include the following:

Cardiac MRI in pericardial effusions

It is important to distinguish the thickness of the pericardium from any pericardial effusion, which commonly appears black on spin echo images but bright on gradient echo cines. Moderate-sized effusions are often associated with a pericardial space anterior to the right ventricle of size greater than 5mm. Cine images can detect cardiac tamponade by revealing diastolic collapse of right sided and sometimes left-sided cardiac chambers. Regarding the composition of pericardial effusions, transudates have low signal on T1-weighted images but high signal on T2-weighted and gradient echo images. Exudates display an intermediate signal on both types of sequences. Hemorrhagic effusions may show a wide range of signal intensity on spin-echo sequences that depends on the age of the effusion.

Cardiac MRI in other pericardial pathologies

Other types of pericardial pathology detectable by CMR include pericardial cysts; metastasis and primary tumors of the pericardium; and intracardiac tumors such as myxomas, lipomas, and teratomas. The signal intensity of fluid within pericardial cysts increases progressively with echo time, leading to accurate detection. Pericardial calcification, on the other hand, is not well-detected by CMR. Calcium appears black on CMR and therefore may resemble a localized area of pericardial thickening; cardiac CT is preferred for visualizing pericardial calcification.

References