Pituitary adenoma

(Redirected from Pituitary microadenoma)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

For patient information click here

Pituitary adenoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pituitary adenoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural history, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pituitary adenoma On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pituitary adenoma

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pituitary adenoma

CDC on Pituitary adenoma

Pituitary adenoma in the news

Blogs on Pituitary adenoma

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pituitary adenoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pituitary adenoma

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omar Elshafei, MD[2] Ahmad Al Maradni, M.D. [3]

Synonyms and keywords:: Pituitary macroadenoma; Pituitary microadenoma; Pituitary adenomas, Adenoma of the pituitary gland; Pituitary non-functioning adenoma; Gonadotropic adenoma; Thyrotropic adenoma; TSH-oma; Plurihormonal pituitary adenoma; Null cell adenomas; Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor; PitNET

Pituitary adenomas are neoplasms arising from the hormone-producing cells of the anterior pituitary gland. The 2022 World Health Organization classification renames them pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) and subtypes them by transcription factor lineage (PIT1, TPIT and SF1), whereas clinical societies continue to use the term adenoma because the vast majority are benign and do not shorten life expectancy. Tumors are classified by size as microadenomas (smaller than 10 mm) or macroadenomas (10 mm or larger), and by secretory status as functioning tumors, which cause hyperprolactinemia, acromegaly or gigantism, Cushing's disease or, rarely, central hyperthyroidism, or as clinically nonfunctioning tumors, which present with mass effect or are discovered incidentally.

Pituitary adenomas are common. A systematic review estimated a pooled prevalence of 16.7% in autopsy and imaging studies, and clinically evident adenomas affect approximately 1 in 1100 people. Prolactinomas are the most frequent clinically apparent subtype, followed by nonfunctioning adenomas, somatotroph tumors and corticotroph tumors. Most tumors are sporadic, but germline predisposition, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, familial isolated pituitary adenoma and AIP mutations, is more frequent in young and familial cases. Macroadenomas may compress the optic chiasm and cause visual field defects, headache and hypopituitarism, and hemorrhage or infarction of an adenoma causes pituitary apoplexy, a medical emergency.

Evaluation requires dedicated pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical testing for hormone excess and deficiency, and formal visual field assessment when the tumor approaches the optic apparatus. Dopamine agonist therapy, preferably with cabergoline, is first-line treatment for most prolactinomas, and transsphenoidal surgery is an accepted alternative for selected microprolactinomas. Transsphenoidal surgery is first-line for somatotroph, corticotroph and thyrotroph tumors and for nonfunctioning adenomas causing mass effect, whereas asymptomatic nonfunctioning adenomas can be followed with surveillance imaging. Medical options include somatostatin receptor ligands (including oral formulations), pegvisomant, steroidogenesis inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor antagonists; radiotherapy is a second- or third-line option, and temozolomide is the first-line chemotherapy for aggressive tumors. Lifelong follow-up is required because hypopituitarism, active acromegaly and Cushing's disease are associated with excess mortality.

  • In 1993, Knosp and colleagues proposed a magnetic resonance imaging classification of cavernous sinus invasion based on the position of the tumor relative to the intracavernous and supracavernous internal carotid artery, which remains the standard grading system for parasellar extension.[1]
  • In 1994, a randomized comparison in 459 women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea showed that cabergoline was more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine.[2]
  • In 2000, a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 112 patients established the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant as a treatment for acromegaly.[3]
  • In 2006, germline mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein gene (AIP) were identified as a cause of low-penetrance pituitary adenoma predisposition.[4]
  • In 2013, a five-tier clinicopathological classification based on invasion and proliferation was validated in 410 patients followed for 8 years after surgery.[5]
  • In 2014, X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG), caused by Xq26.3 microduplications involving GPR101, was described as a cause of early childhood gigantism,[6] and somatic mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 were subsequently identified in corticotroph adenomas causing Cushing's disease.[7]
  • In 2017, the International Pituitary Pathology Club proposed replacing the term pituitary adenoma with pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET).[8] The fifth edition of the WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors (2022) adopted the PitNET terminology,[9] whereas the Pituitary Society-coordinated Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature (PANOMEN) workshop concluded in 2021 that there was not yet a case for adopting it.[10]
  • In 2022, an international working group proposed renaming central diabetes insipidus arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus arginine vasopressin resistance (AVP-R).[11]
  • Since 2020, phase 3 randomized trials have established oral somatostatin receptor ligand therapy for acromegaly, first with oral octreotide capsules[12][13] and then with the once-daily nonpeptide somatostatin receptor type 2 agonist paltusotine.[14][15]

Pituitary adenomas are classified by size, by clinical secretory status, by histopathological lineage according to the 2022 WHO classification, and by invasiveness and proliferation.

Classification by Size

Category Maximum diameter Clinical relevance
Microadenoma Smaller than 10 mm Usually present with hormone excess or are found incidentally; nonfunctioning microadenomas have a low probability of growth
Macroadenoma 10 mm or larger Account for 48% of pituitary adenomas; may cause visual field defects, headache and hypopituitarism
Giant adenoma Conventionally 40 mm or larger Recognized as a separate size category in prognostic clinicopathological classification

[16][5][17]

Classification by Secretory Status

Tumor type Hormone in excess Clinical syndrome Approximate proportion of pituitary adenomas
Lactotroph tumor (prolactinoma) Prolactin Hypogonadism, infertility and galactorrhea 53%
Somatotroph tumor Growth hormone Acromegaly in adults; gigantism in children 12%
Corticotroph tumor Adrenocorticotropic hormone Cushing's disease 4%
Thyrotroph tumor (TSH-secreting adenoma) Thyroid-stimulating hormone Central hyperthyroidism with elevated free thyroid hormones and a nonsuppressed TSH Very rare
Clinically nonfunctioning tumor (mostly gonadotroph tumors; also null cell and clinically silent tumors) None clinically evident Mass effect, hypopituitarism or incidental discovery 30%

[16][18][9]

2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors distinguishes anterior lobe (adenohypophyseal) tumors, namely PitNETs, pituitary blastoma and the two types of craniopharyngioma, from posterior lobe tumors (the pituicyte tumor family) and hypothalamic neuronal tumors. PitNETs are subtyped by tumor cell lineage, cell type and related characteristics, and routine immunohistochemistry for the pituitary transcription factors PIT1, TPIT and SF1, together with GATA3 and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), is endorsed.[9]

Lineage (transcription factor) PitNET types and subtypes Usual clinical presentation
PIT1 Somatotroph (densely and sparsely granulated); lactotroph (densely and sparsely granulated); mammosomatotroph; mixed somatotroph and lactotroph; thyrotroph; mature plurihormonal PIT1-lineage tumor; immature PIT1-lineage tumor (formerly silent subtype 3); acidophil stem cell tumor Acromegaly or gigantism; hyperprolactinemia; central hyperthyroidism; some tumors are clinically silent
TPIT Corticotroph (densely granulated, sparsely granulated and Crooke cell) Cushing's disease, or a clinically silent corticotroph tumor
SF1 Gonadotroph Usually clinically nonfunctioning
No distinct lineage Null cell tumor (a diagnosis of exclusion); plurihormonal tumors with multilineage differentiation Usually clinically nonfunctioning

[9]

  • Mammosomatotroph and acidophil stem cell tumors are distinct PIT1-lineage PitNETs, and the 2017 category of PIT1-positive plurihormonal tumor has been replaced by the immature PIT1-lineage tumor and the mature plurihormonal PIT1-lineage tumor.[9]
  • The null cell tumor is reserved for PitNETs with no evidence of adenohypophyseal lineage differentiation, and recognition of multiple synchronous PitNETs is emphasized to avoid misclassification.[9]
  • Subtypes associated with a high risk of adverse biology, including sparsely granulated somatotroph tumors, immature PIT1-lineage tumors, Crooke cell tumors and silent corticotroph tumors, are emphasized within their lineage.[9]
  • The term metastatic PitNET replaces "pituitary carcinoma" to avoid confusion with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma.[9]

Classification by Cavernous Sinus Invasion (Knosp Grade)

The Knosp classification grades parasellar extension on coronal magnetic resonance imaging relative to three lines drawn on the intracavernous and supracavernous internal carotid artery: a medial tangent, the intercarotid line through the cross-sectional centers, and a lateral tangent.[1] The modified classification divides grade 3 into superior (3A) and inferior (3B) compartment extension.[19]

Knosp grade Radiological definition Invasion confirmed at endoscopic surgery Gross-total resection Endocrine remission (functioning tumors)
0 Does not extend beyond the medial tangent (normal condition) No invasion in the original series Not assessed
1 Extends beyond the medial tangent but not beyond the intercarotid line 1.5% 83% 88%
2 Extends beyond the intercarotid line but not beyond the lateral tangent 9.9% 71% 60%
3A Extends beyond the lateral tangent into the superior cavernous sinus compartment 26.5% 85% 67%
3B Extends beyond the lateral tangent into the inferior cavernous sinus compartment 70.6% 64% 0%
4 Total encasement of the intracavernous internal carotid artery 100% 0% 0%

[1][19]

In the original microscopic series, surgically proven invasion was present in all grade 3 and grade 4 tumors and in all but one grade 2 tumor.[1] Direct endoscopic inspection found invasion in 9.9% of grade 2 adenomas compared with 88% on microscopic evaluation, and in 37.9% of grade 3 adenomas compared with 86%.[19]

Clinicopathological Grading

A five-tier prognostic classification combines magnetic resonance imaging evidence of cavernous or sphenoid sinus invasion with proliferation markers (Ki-67, mitotic count and p53).[5]

Grade Definition
1a Noninvasive
1b Noninvasive and proliferative
2a Invasive
2b Invasive and proliferative
3 Metastatic

[5]

In a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years of postoperative follow-up, invasive and proliferative (grade 2b) tumors carried a 25-fold increase in the probability of tumor persistence and a 12-fold increase in the probability of progression compared with noninvasive (grade 1a) tumors.[5]

Aggressive and Metastatic PitNETs

  • Aggressive pituitary tumors are a small subset that does not respond to standard medical treatment and shows multiple local recurrences; tumors with metastases were previously termed pituitary carcinomas[20] and are now designated metastatic PitNETs.[9]
  • In a European Society of Endocrinology survey of 166 patients with aggressive tumors or carcinomas, 69% of tumors were clinically functioning, corticotroph tumors were the most frequent immunohistochemical subtype (45%), and the Ki-67 index did not distinguish aggressive tumors from carcinomas (median 7% and 10%, respectively).[21]
  • In a subsequent survey of 171 patients (121 aggressive tumors and 50 carcinomas), 96% initially presented as macroadenomas or giant tumors, 97 tumors initially considered clinically benign demonstrated aggressive behavior after 5.5 years (IQR 2.8 to 12), and metastases were observed a median of 6.3 years (IQR 3.7 to 12.1) after diagnosis. At first surgery, the Ki-67 index was 3% or higher in 74 of 93 tumors (80%) and 10% or higher in 38 of 93 (41%).[22]

Nomenclature

The terms pituitary adenoma and pituitary neuroendocrine tumor are both in current use. The WHO classification adopted the PitNET terminology,[9] whereas a multidisciplinary workshop including representatives nominated by the Endocrine Society, the European Society of Endocrinology, the European Neuroendocrine Association, the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International Society of Pituitary Surgeons recommended retaining the term adenoma, because the vast majority of pituitary adenomas are benign and do not adversely affect life expectancy and because the PitNET designation does not address the main challenge of prognostic prediction.[10]

Tumor Biology

  • Pituitary adenomas occur in 10% of the population, yet the overwhelming majority remain harmless during life, and fewer than one-thousandth of all pituitary adenomas are estimated to cause clinically significant disease.[23]
  • Disease-causing adenomas are triggered by somatic or germline mutations that disrupt intrapituitary signaling and promote benign cell proliferation associated with chromosomal instability; cellular senescence acts as a buffer against malignant transformation, which is an extremely rare event.[23]
  • Growth hormone-secreting adenomas arise as monoclonal expansions of differentiated somatotroph cells and are usually sporadic; they are almost invariably benign but can be locally invasive and may grow progressively despite treatment.[24]
  • Tumor phenotype follows the lineage-restricted pituitary transcription factors that govern normal adenohypophyseal differentiation: PIT1 for somatotroph, lactotroph and thyrotroph cells, TPIT for corticotroph cells and SF1 for gonadotroph cells.[9]

Molecular Genetics

  • Somatic USP8 mutations: exome sequencing identified somatic mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 in 4 of 10 corticotroph adenomas. The mutations cluster in the 14-3-3 protein binding motif, enhance proteolytic cleavage and catalytic activity of USP8, increase deubiquitination of the epidermal growth factor receptor and sustain EGF signaling, which enhances proopiomelanocortin promoter activity.[7]
  • Germline AIP mutations: two AIP mutations accounted for 16% of all patients with growth hormone-secreting adenomas in a population-based series from Northern Finland and for 40% of those diagnosed before 35 years of age; carriers typically lack a strong family history, consistent with low penetrance.[4] Germline AIP mutations are associated with large adenomas presenting in children, adolescents and young adults, usually somatotropinomas, and gigantism occurs in more than one third of affected somatotropinoma patients.[25] Patients with truncating AIP mutations have a younger age at disease onset and diagnosis than those with nontruncating mutations, and somatic GNAS1 mutations are absent from AIP-mutated tumors.[26]
  • X-linked acrogigantism: Xq26.3 microduplications were found in 13 of 43 patients with gigantism, all with disease onset in early childhood. GPR101 was the only duplicated protein-coding gene overexpressed in pituitary lesions, and a recurrent GPR101 mutation (p.E308D) was found in 11 of 248 patients with acromegaly, mostly in tumor tissue.[6]
  • Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: an autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the tumor-suppressor gene MEN1, which encodes the scaffold protein menin, and characterized by the combined occurrence of parathyroid tumors, duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and anterior pituitary adenomas.[27]

Mechanisms of Clinical Manifestations

Mechanism Pathophysiology Clinical consequences
Prolactin excess Autonomous prolactin secretion by lactotroph tumors, or loss of dopaminergic inhibition of normal lactotrophs when a sellar mass compresses the pituitary stalk Hypogonadism, infertility and galactorrhea
Growth hormone and IGF-I excess Persistent excess of growth hormone and its target hormone insulin-like growth factor 1 Cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, musculoskeletal, neurological and neoplastic comorbidities that might not be reversible with disease control
ACTH excess Corticotroph tumor-driven adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion with adrenal cortisol excess Cushing's disease, with comorbidities that may persist after remission and impair quality of life
TSH excess Autonomous thyroid-stimulating hormone secretion Elevated free T4 and T3 with a nonsuppressed TSH; inappropriate thyroid ablation results in a significant increase in tumor mass
Compression of the optic apparatus Suprasellar extension compresses the optic chiasm Visual field defects in 18% to 78% of patients with macroadenomas
Compression of the normal gland Loss of anterior pituitary hormone production Hypopituitarism in 34% to 89% of patients with macroadenomas
Sellar mass effect Local expansion of the sellar contents Headache in 17% to 75% of patients with macroadenomas
Parasellar invasion Extension into the cavernous sinus Lower likelihood of gross-total resection and endocrine remission; palsies of the third, fourth and sixth cranial nerves occur particularly with apoplexy
Hemorrhage or infarction Abrupt hemorrhagic or ischemic necrosis of the adenoma Pituitary apoplexy

[16][28][24][29][18][19][30][31]

Category Cause Key features
Sporadic Somatic genetic alterations, such as USP8 mutations in corticotroph tumors Account for the large majority of pituitary adenomas
Syndromic hereditary Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) Autosomal dominant; parathyroid tumors, duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and anterior pituitary adenomas
Nonsyndromic hereditary Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA), including germline AIP mutations FIPA comprises approximately 2% of pituitary adenomas and AIP mutations account for 20% of FIPA families; large, early-onset tumors, usually somatotroph
Nonsyndromic hereditary X-linked acrogigantism (Xq26.3 microduplication involving GPR101) Gigantism with onset in early childhood
Other rare hereditary syndromes Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (CDKN1B), Carney complex (PRKAR1A) and succinate dehydrogenase-related syndromes Pituitary tumors occur as part of a broader syndromic phenotype

[23][7][27][25][4][6]

Pituitary adenomas are the most frequently encountered sellar masses, but other lesions must be considered. In a 10-year series of 2598 patients undergoing pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, a normal gland was reported in 47% of patients; nonadenomatous sellar masses accounted for 18% of visible lesions, of which the most common were Rathke cleft cyst (19%), craniopharyngioma (15%) and meningioma (15%), and metastases accounted for 5% of nonpituitary lesions, with breast cancer the most common primary source.[32]

Differentiating Pituitary Adenoma from Other Sellar and Parasellar Lesions

Condition Clinical features Imaging features Endocrine features Distinguishing points
Pituitary adenoma (PitNET) Hormone excess syndrome, hypogonadism, visual field defects, headache or incidental finding Sellar mass that may extend into the suprasellar cistern or cavernous sinus; may be cystic or hemorrhagic Hormone excess (prolactin, growth hormone, ACTH or TSH) or hypopituitarism Most frequent sellar mass; lineage confirmed by transcription factor immunohistochemistry
Rathke's cleft cyst Often incidental; headache Intrasellar or suprasellar cyst Usually normal Most common nonadenomatous sellar lesion; cystic lesions rarely enlarge (0.05 per 100 person-years)
Craniopharyngioma Visual loss and headache; growth failure in children Cystic and solid suprasellar mass, frequently calcified Hypopituitarism and arginine vasopressin deficiency Two types are recognized by the WHO classification
Meningioma Visual loss Dural-based enhancing mass Pituitary function usually preserved 15% of nonadenomatous sellar lesions
Hypophysitis (autoimmune, IgG4-related, immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced or secondary to systemic disease) Headache with anterior and/or posterior pituitary dysfunction Pituitary stalk thickening and homogeneous enlargement of the gland; imaging is not always specific Hypopituitarism, often with arginine vasopressin deficiency A response to glucocorticoids is not diagnostic; only biopsy confirms the type and excludes other etiologies
Pituitary metastasis Known or occult malignancy Sellar or parasellar mass Variable 5% of nonpituitary sellar lesions; breast cancer is the most common primary source
Posterior lobe and hypothalamic tumors (pituicyte tumor family, gangliocytoma, neurocytoma) Mass effect Sellar or suprasellar mass Variable Rare; classified separately from PitNETs by the WHO
Physiological pituitary enlargement in pregnancy Pregnancy Diffuse enlargement of the gland Physiological changes of pregnancy Pituitary gland size increases during normal pregnancy

[32][33][9][34][35]

Differentiating Causes of Hyperprolactinemia

Category Causes Diagnostic approach
Physiological Pregnancy, lactation and venipuncture stress Pregnancy test; repeat measurement on a sample obtained without excessive venipuncture stress
Pharmacological Antipsychotics and other dopamine antagonists, among other drugs If safe, discontinue the drug for 3 days or substitute an alternative and remeasure prolactin; if this is not possible and the onset of hyperprolactinemia did not coincide with therapy, obtain pituitary MRI
Pituitary and sellar disease Prolactinoma; stalk compression by a nonfunctioning adenoma or another sellar mass Pituitary MRI; serial dilution of the sample when a large adenoma is accompanied by a normal or mildly elevated prolactin, to exclude the hook effect
Systemic disease Primary hypothyroidism; chronic kidney disease TSH and free T4; renal function
Analytical Macroprolactinemia Assessment for macroprolactin in asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia

[28][36]

Differentiating TSH-Secreting Adenoma from Resistance to Thyroid Hormone

Feature TSH-secreting adenoma Resistance to thyroid hormone
Free T4 and free T3 Elevated Elevated
TSH Nonsuppressed Nonsuppressed
TSH response to TRH stimulation Absent or blunted in most patients Normal or exaggerated
TSH after T3 suppression Never completely suppressed Suppressed, although suppression may be incomplete
Sex hormone-binding globulin Elevated Normal
Alpha-subunit and alpha-subunit/TSH molar ratio Often elevated Normal
Pituitary MRI Adenoma usually visible Usually no adenoma; incidental pituitary lesions may coexist
Genetic testing and family history Negative THRB variant usually identified; affected relatives

[18]

Prevalence

  • A systematic review of autopsy and imaging studies estimated an overall prevalence of pituitary adenomas of 16.7% (14.4% in autopsy studies and 22.5% in radiological studies).[37]
  • Pituitary adenomas are estimated to occur in 10% of the population, although fewer than one-thousandth cause clinically significant disease.[23]
  • Clinically evident pituitary adenomas occur in approximately 1 in 1100 persons; approximately 53% are prolactinomas, 30% are nonfunctioning adenomas, 12% are somatotropinomas and 4% are corticotropinomas.[16]
Population-based prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas
Study Population Prevalence Subtype distribution
Liège, Belgium (cross-sectional case finding, 2005) 68 patients among 71,972 residents 94 ± 19.3 per 100,000 (95% CI 72.2 to 115.8); one case per 1064 individuals Prolactinoma 66%; nonsecreting 14.7%; somatotropinoma 13.2%; Cushing's disease 5.9%
Banbury, United Kingdom (community-based, 2006) 63 patients identified through general practice records 77.6 per 100,000 Prolactinoma 57%; nonfunctioning 28%; acromegaly 11%; corticotroph 2%; unknown functional status 2%
Iceland (nationwide, 1955 to 2012) 471 individuals 115.57 per 100,000 in 2012 Across the whole period: nonfunctioning 43.0%; prolactinoma 39.9%; acromegaly 11.3%; Cushing's disease 5.7%

[38][39][40]

  • Among adenomas initially identified on pituitary MRI at a tertiary referral center, prolactinomas accounted for 40%, nonfunctioning adenomas for 37% and growth hormone-secreting adenomas for 13%.[32]

Incidence

  • In Iceland, the total standardized incidence rate of pituitary adenomas increased significantly over six decades to 5.8 per 100,000 per year; prevalence in 2012 was highest for prolactinomas (54.37 per 100,000), followed by nonfunctioning adenomas (42.32 per 100,000).[40]
  • In a Swedish nationwide registry study of 2795 patients, the annual incidence of nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma was 20.3 (95% CI 18.8 to 21.9) cases per 1 million inhabitants.[41]

Age

  • In the Liège cohort, the mean age at diagnosis was 40.3 years.[38]
  • In the Banbury cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 32.0 years for prolactinomas, 51.5 years for nonfunctioning adenomas, 47 years for acromegaly and 57 years for corticotroph adenomas. Prolactinomas were the most frequent adenomas up to the age of 60 years (75% of adenomas at 0 to 20 years and 61% at 20 to 60 years), whereas nonfunctioning adenomas predominated after the age of 60 years (60% of adenomas).[39]
  • In Sweden, the mean age at diagnosis of nonfunctioning adenoma was 58 years (60 years in men and 56 years in women).[41]

Sex

  • In the Liège cohort, 67.6% of patients were female.[38]
  • Nonfunctioning adenomas accounted for 57% of adenomas in men, whereas prolactinomas accounted for 76% of adenomas in women.[39]
  • Women are diagnosed at a younger age and with smaller adenomas than men.[40]

Clinical Characteristics at Diagnosis

  • In the Liège cohort, 42.6% of patients had macroadenomas, 55.9% underwent surgery and 20.6% had hypopituitarism.[38]
  • The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 1.5 years for prolactinomas, 0.8 years for nonfunctioning adenomas, 4.5 years for acromegaly and 7 years for corticotroph adenomas.[39]
  • Although the rising incidence is related to the introduction of modern imaging, the vast majority of patients are symptomatic at diagnosis.[40]

Most pituitary adenomas are sporadic. Recognized risk factors include:

  • Germline predisposition: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1,[27] familial isolated pituitary adenoma and germline AIP mutations,[25] and X-linked acrogigantism.[6]
  • Young age at onset: AIP mutations accounted for 40% of patients with growth hormone-secreting adenomas diagnosed before 35 years of age in Northern Finland.[4]
  • Family history of pituitary adenoma: familial isolated pituitary adenoma families comprise approximately 2% of pituitary adenomas, although AIP mutation carriers frequently lack a strong family history.[25][4]
  • Sex and age by subtype: prolactinomas predominate in women and before the age of 60 years, whereas nonfunctioning adenomas predominate in men and after the age of 60 years.[39]

Risk Factors for Pituitary Apoplexy

  • Macroadenoma and nonfunctioning status were the only factors consistently associated with apoplexy in a systematic review of 7 studies including 4937 patients.[42]
  • Precipitating factors include increased intracranial pressure, arterial hypertension, major surgery, anticoagulant therapy and dynamic endocrine testing.[30]
  • Pregnancy is a recognized risk factor.[42][35]

Risk Factors for Aggressive Behavior

  • A Ki-67 index of 10% or higher and ACTH secretion are associated with a worse prognosis in aggressive tumors and metastatic PitNETs.[22]
  • Invasive and proliferative tumors carry the highest risk of persistence and progression after surgery.[5]

Screening for pituitary adenomas is targeted to individuals with an inherited predisposition, patients with clinical features suggestive of pituitary hormone excess, and patients with an incidentally discovered pituitary lesion.

Inherited Predisposition

  • Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: identification of individuals at high risk is facilitated by genetic testing of patients and their first-degree relatives, followed by periodic clinical, biochemical and radiological screening of patients and MEN1 mutation carriers. Without treatment, MEN1 carries high morbidity and premature mortality, which can be mitigated by early tumor detection and intervention.[27]
  • AIP mutation carriers: among 164 apparently unaffected AIP mutation-positive family members, pituitary disease was detected in 18 of those who underwent clinical screening, a quarter of the carriers screened, which justifies screening.[26]
  • X-linked acrogigantism: testing for Xq26.3 microduplication is relevant in early childhood gigantism; in the original series, none of the patients with gigantism who lacked the microduplication presented before 5 years of age.[6]

Clinical Suspicion of Hormone Excess

  • Acromegaly: measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor 1 is recommended in patients with typical clinical manifestations, especially acral and facial features, and acromegaly should be considered in patients without typical manifestations who have several associated conditions, such as obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes mellitus, debilitating arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, hyperhidrosis and hypertension; random growth hormone levels should not be relied upon for diagnosis.[43]
  • Cushing's syndrome: after exclusion of exogenous glucocorticoid use, testing is recommended in patients with multiple and progressive features compatible with the syndrome, particularly those with a high discriminatory value, and in patients with an adrenal incidentaloma.[44]
  • Hyperprolactinemia: a single measurement of serum prolactin is used for diagnosis, provided that the sample was obtained without excessive venipuncture stress.[28]

Incidentally Discovered Pituitary Lesions

  • Patients with a pituitary incidentaloma should undergo a complete history and physical examination, laboratory screening for hormone hypersecretion and for hypopituitarism, and a visual field examination if the lesion abuts the optic nerves or chiasm.[45]
  • Biochemical screening for hyperprolactinemia and acromegaly is needed in all patients with a pituitary incidentaloma, whereas testing for hyposecretion is recommended for lesions larger than 6.0 mm.[46]

Natural History

Nonfunctioning Adenomas and Incidentalomas

Lesion Source Growth
Macroadenoma Meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies 12.5 per 100 person-years (95% CI 7.9 to 17.2)
Solid lesion Meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies 5.7 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.3 to 9.2)
Microadenoma Meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies 3.3 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.1 to 4.5)
Cystic lesion Meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies 0.05 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.0 to 0.2)
Nonfunctioning microadenoma UK NFPA consortium, 459 patients Cumulative probability 7.8% (95% CI 4.9% to 8.1%) at 3 years and 14.5% (95% CI 10.2% to 18.8%) at 5 years
Conservatively managed nonfunctioning macroadenoma UK NFPA consortium, 949 patients 9.8 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 8.8 to 10.8); cumulative probability 1.6%, 8.1%, 18.4%, 29.2% and 43.6% at 6 months, 1, 2, 3 and 5 years

[33][17][47]

  • In the meta-analysis, follow-up ranged from 3 to 15 years, the overall incidence of new endocrine dysfunction was 2.4 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.0 to 6.4), pituitary apoplexy and worsening of visual field defects were rare, and the quality of the evidence was very low.[33]
  • Nonfunctioning microadenomas may also regress, with a cumulative probability of reduction of 14.1% (95% CI 10.4% to 17.8%) at 3 years and 21.3% (95% CI 16.4% to 26.2%) at 5 years. Median enlargement was 2 mm (IQR 1 to 3), 49% of the microadenomas that grew became macroadenomas (nearly all were larger than 5 mm at detection), 8 patients (1.9%) underwent surgery, and 2 patients (0.6%) developed new hypopituitarism, both after progression to a macroadenoma.[17]
  • In conservatively managed macroadenomas, enlargement was more frequent in tumors abutting or displacing the optic chiasm, and none of the tumors not in contact with the chiasm that enlarged within 6 months affected the visual fields. After a first enlargement with continued monitoring (median 2.6 years), further growth occurred in 60.5%, stability in 35.5% and shrinkage in 4.0%; new pituitary hormone deficits developed in 4.0% to 4.9%, mainly driven by tumor enlargement.[47]

Aggressive Behavior

  • Aggressive behavior may emerge late: in a series of 171 aggressive tumors and metastatic PitNETs, 97 tumors initially considered clinically benign became aggressive after 5.5 years (IQR 2.8 to 12), and 5 of 13 silent corticotroph tumors and 2 of 6 silent somatotroph tumors became secreting.[22]

Complications

  • Mass effect: visual field defects, headache and hypopituitarism occur in approximately 18% to 78%, 17% to 75% and 34% to 89% of patients with macroadenomas, respectively.[16]
  • Pituitary apoplexy: abrupt hemorrhage or infarction complicates 2% to 12% of pituitary adenomas, especially nonfunctioning tumors. Sudden severe headache is the main symptom, sometimes with visual disturbance or ocular palsy, meningeal irritation or altered consciousness, and corticotropic deficiency with adrenal insufficiency may be life-threatening if left untreated.[30] In the Banbury population, 5 patients (7.9%) presented with classical apoplexy, a prevalence of 6.2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants.[39] Across 7 studies including 4937 patients with adenomas, 490 (9.92%) had apoplexy, including subclinical events.[42]
  • Complications of growth hormone excess: cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, musculoskeletal, neurological and neoplastic comorbidities, which might not be reversible with disease control and require multidisciplinary management.[24][48]
  • Complications of hypercortisolism: causes of death in endogenous Cushing's syndrome include atherosclerotic disease and thromboembolism (43.4%), infection (12.7%), malignancy (10.6%), active disease (3.5%), adrenal insufficiency (3.0%) and suicide (2.2%).[49] The elevated risk of venous thromboembolism associated with hypercortisolism underlies recommendations for thromboprophylaxis.[50]
  • Complications of treatment:
    • New hormone deficiency at 6 months after transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning adenomas occurred in 28.4% of patients after microscopic surgery and 9.7% after endoscopic surgery.[51]
    • After transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma, permanent diabetes insipidus occurred in 2% (95% CI 0 to 5) and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 3% (95% CI 2 to 5).[52]
    • After surgery for nonfunctioning macroadenoma, hypopituitarism reversed in 12% to 17%, additional anterior pituitary hormone deficits developed in 12% to 15%, and permanent vasopressin deficiency occurred in 3.5%.[47]
    • After Gamma Knife radiosurgery for nonfunctioning adenomas, new or worsened hypopituitarism occurred in 21% and new or progressive cranial nerve deficits in 9%.[53]
    • Hyperglycemia-related adverse events occurred in 57.3% of patients receiving pasireotide LAR, compared with 21.7% receiving octreotide LAR.[54]
    • Dopamine agonists may cause impulse control disorders, depression, mania and psychosis regardless of prior psychiatric history,[55] and low-dose cabergoline is associated with an increased prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation of uncertain clinical significance.[56]

Prognosis

Mortality associated with pituitary adenomas and their complications
Population Study design Standardized mortality ratio (SMR)
Hypopituitarism (1014 patients; 57% with nonfunctioning adenomas) Prospective cohort, West Midlands, United Kingdom 1.87 (99% CI 1.62 to 2.16); women 2.29 (1.86 to 2.82) and men 1.57 (1.28 to 1.93); untreated gonadotropin deficiency 2.97 (2.13 to 4.13) versus treated 1.42 (0.97 to 2.07)
Nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (2795 patients) Swedish nationwide registry study 1.10 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.20); diagnosis before 40 years 2.68 (1.23 to 5.09); women 1.29 (1.11 to 1.48); men 1.00 (0.88 to 1.12)
Acromegaly Meta-analysis of 26 studies Studies published after 2008: 1.35 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.85); series using somatostatin analogs as adjuvant treatment: 0.98 (0.83 to 1.15); series treated only with surgery and/or radiotherapy: 2.11 (1.54 to 2.91)
Endogenous Cushing's syndrome Meta-analysis of 14 articles (3691 patients) All Cushing's syndrome 3.0 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.9); Cushing's disease 2.8 (2.1 to 3.7)
Cushing's disease (502 patients) Swedish nationwide study 2.5 (95% CI 2.1 to 2.9); patients in remission 1.9 (1.5 to 2.3)

[57][41][58][49][59]

  • In hypopituitarism, excess mortality was attributed to cardiovascular (SMR 1.82, 1.30 to 2.54), respiratory (2.66, 1.72 to 4.11) and cerebrovascular (2.44, 1.58 to 4.18) causes, and was higher with an underlying diagnosis of craniopharyngioma (9.28, 5.84 to 14.75) and in patients treated with radiotherapy (2.32, 1.71 to 3.14). Age at diagnosis, female sex, craniopharyngioma and untreated gonadotropin deficiency were independent risk factors.[57]
  • In nonfunctioning adenomas, mortality was increased from cerebrovascular (SMR 1.73, 1.34 to 2.19) and infectious diseases (2.08, 1.17 to 3.44) and in patients with diabetes insipidus (1.71, 1.07 to 2.58), whereas mortality from malignant tumors was decreased (0.76, 0.61 to 0.94).[41]
  • In acromegaly, mortality is not increased in patients who achieve biochemical control but remains higher in those with active disease, and cancer has become a leading cause of death as life expectancy has improved.[58]
  • In Cushing's disease, cardiovascular disease was the commonest cause of death (SMR 3.3, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.3), with excess mortality also from infections and suicide. Among patients in remission, bilateral adrenalectomy and glucocorticoid replacement therapy were independently associated with increased mortality, whereas growth hormone replacement was associated with improved outcome.[59] The proportion of deaths in Cushing's syndrome fell from 10% in articles published before 2000 to 3% thereafter.[49]
  • Median survival in aggressive pituitary tumors and metastatic PitNETs was 17.2 and 11.3 years, respectively.[22]

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Diagnostic Approach

  • All patients with a pituitary tumor require endocrine evaluation for hormone hypersecretion; patients with macroadenomas additionally require evaluation for hypopituitarism, and patients with tumors compressing the optic chiasm should be referred to an ophthalmologist for formal visual field testing.[16]
  • Dedicated pituitary magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging study of choice for characterizing sellar lesions.[45][32]
  • In acromegaly, referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology or imaging findings at diagnosis.[60]

Diagnostic Algorithm

 
 
 
 
Suspected pituitary adenoma
Sellar mass on imaging, clinical features of hormone excess, hypogonadism or mass effect
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dedicated pituitary MRI with gadolinium
Focused history and physical examination
Formal visual field testing if the lesion abuts the optic nerves or chiasm
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hormonal evaluation for hypersecretion and hypopituitarism
Prolactin, with serial dilution if a large adenoma has a normal or mildly elevated level
IGF-I; testing for hypercortisolism if clinically suspected
TSH and free T4; LH, FSH and testosterone or estradiol; morning cortisol
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hyperprolactinemia
 
Excess growth hormone, ACTH or TSH
 
No hormone excess
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exclude pregnancy, medications, primary hypothyroidism, renal failure and macroprolactin
Prolactin disproportionately low for a macroadenoma suggests stalk compression
Concordant findings indicate a prolactinoma
 
Acromegaly: IGF-I more than 1.3 times the upper limit of normal with typical features; OGTT if equivocal
Cushing disease: two concordant first-line tests and ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism; IPSS if MRI is negative or equivocal
TSH-secreting adenoma: elevated free T4 and T3 with nonsuppressed TSH; exclude resistance to thyroid hormone
 
Clinically nonfunctioning adenoma or nonadenomatous sellar lesion
Evaluate for hypopituitarism, particularly in macroadenomas
Consider Rathke cleft cyst, craniopharyngioma, meningioma, hypophysitis and metastasis

[16][28][60][61][18][45][32]

History and Symptoms

  • Mass effect: headache (17% to 75% of patients with macroadenomas), visual field loss (18% to 78%), classically bitemporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression, and symptoms of hypopituitarism (34% to 89%).[16]
  • Prolactin excess: hypogonadism, infertility, galactorrhea and, in women, menstrual irregularity or amenorrhea.[16][28]
  • Growth hormone excess: acral and facial changes and associated conditions such as sleep apnea, diabetes, arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, hyperhidrosis and hypertension; the median duration of symptoms before diagnosis of acromegaly was 4.5 years in a community-based study.[43][39]
  • Cortisol excess: multiple and progressive features of Cushing's syndrome; the median duration of symptoms before diagnosis of a corticotroph adenoma was 7 years.[44][39]
  • TSH excess: symptoms of hyperthyroidism in the presence of a nonsuppressed TSH.[18]
  • Pituitary apoplexy: sudden onset of headache, vomiting, visual impairment and decreased consciousness, with or without involvement of the second, third, fourth and sixth cranial nerves.[31]
  • Family history: pituitary tumors in relatives, or features of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 such as primary hyperparathyroidism or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.[25][27]

Physical Examination

  • Visual assessment: visual acuity, confrontation visual fields followed by formal perimetry when the lesion abuts the optic apparatus, and ocular motility to detect cranial nerve palsies.[45][31]
  • Acromegaly: acral enlargement and coarse facial features.[43]
  • Cushing's syndrome: features with a high discriminatory value, such as easy bruising, facial plethora, proximal myopathy and reddish-purple striae.[44]
  • Hyperprolactinemia: galactorrhea and signs of hypogonadism.[28]
  • TSH-secreting adenoma: signs of hyperthyroidism and goiter.[18]

Laboratory Findings

Clinical question Initial testing Confirmation and interpretation
Hyperprolactinemia Single serum prolactin measurement on a sample obtained without excessive venipuncture stress Exclude pregnancy, medications, primary hypothyroidism and renal failure; assess for macroprolactin in asymptomatic patients; perform serial dilution when a large adenoma is accompanied by a normal or mildly elevated prolactin (hook effect)
Acromegaly Age-adjusted serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) In a patient with typical features, IGF-I more than 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis; random growth hormone is not required for diagnosis but may inform prognosis; for equivocal results, repeat IGF-I with the same validated assay and consider an oral glucose tolerance test, in which lack of suppression of growth hormone to less than 1 μg/L confirms the diagnosis
Cushing's disease After excluding exogenous glucocorticoids, one test with high diagnostic accuracy: 24-hour urinary free cortisol, late-night salivary cortisol, or the 1 mg overnight or 2 mg 48-hour dexamethasone suppression test (abnormal if serum cortisol exceeds 1.8 μg/dL, 50 nmol/L) An abnormal result requires a second test, and concordant abnormal results establish Cushing's syndrome; plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone identifies ACTH-dependent disease, followed by pituitary MRI and, when indicated, inferior petrosal sinus sampling
TSH-secreting adenoma Free T4, free T3 and TSH Elevated free thyroid hormones with a nonsuppressed TSH; TSH after T3 suppression and TRH stimulation, pituitary imaging and genetic testing distinguish TSH-secreting adenoma from resistance to thyroid hormone
Hypopituitarism Morning serum cortisol; free T4 with TSH; LH and FSH with testosterone in men, or estradiol and menstrual history in women; IGF-I; serum sodium A morning cortisol below 3 μg/dL indicates adrenal insufficiency and a value above 15 μg/dL likely excludes it; a low free T4 with a low, normal or mildly elevated TSH indicates central hypothyroidism, and free T4 rather than TSH is used to monitor replacement; dynamic testing is used when results are indeterminate

[28][60][43][44][61][18][62]

  • In a Pituitary Society modified Delphi panel of 41 participants, with consensus defined as at least 70% agreement, 45% (14/31) and 44% (11/25) of statements reached consensus in the two rounds; most panelists reported using late-night salivary cortisol to diagnose mild Cushing's syndrome and to monitor patients after pituitary surgery or medical or radiation therapy.[63]
  • In acromegaly, random growth hormone measured after an overnight fast may be useful for informing prognosis, and diagnostic delay has adverse consequences.[60]

Imaging Findings

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Dedicated pituitary magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium enhancement is the modality of choice for detecting and characterizing pituitary adenomas and for follow-up.[45][32]
  • Coronal imaging allows grading of cavernous sinus invasion with the Knosp classification, which predicts surgically confirmed invasion and the likelihood of gross-total resection and endocrine remission.[1][19]
  • Half of all pituitary MRI scans performed in a large referral population showed no visible lesion, so imaging must be interpreted together with biochemical findings.[32]

Computed Tomography

  • Computed tomography or MRI confirms the diagnosis of pituitary apoplexy by revealing a pituitary tumor with hemorrhagic and/or necrotic components.[30]
  • In suspected pituitary apoplexy, MRI is preferred, and CT is used when MRI is contraindicated or unavailable.[31]

Echocardiography

  • In patients treated with cabergoline for hyperprolactinemia for at least 6 months, a meta-analysis of 13 case-control studies found more tricuspid regurgitation than in controls (OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.79 to 7.8); no tricuspid valve dysfunction was diagnosed on the basis of clinical symptoms, and no other valvulopathy was increased.[56]
  • Cardiovascular complications of acromegaly require assessment and management as part of comorbidity care.[48]

Other Diagnostic Studies

  • Formal visual field testing: recommended when the lesion abuts or compresses the optic nerves or chiasm, at baseline and during follow-up.[45]
  • Inferior petrosal sinus sampling: used to distinguish pituitary from ectopic ACTH secretion in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome when pituitary imaging is negative or equivocal or noninvasive tests are discordant.[61]
  • Genetic testing: AIP testing in familial isolated pituitary adenoma and young-onset adenomas, MEN1 testing in patients with features of MEN1 and their first-degree relatives, and Xq26.3 microduplication testing in early childhood gigantism.[25][26][27][6]
  • Histopathology: classification requires immunohistochemistry for pituitary hormones and transcription factors, and proliferative markers such as Ki-67 and mitotic count help identify tumors at risk of aggressive behavior.[9][20]

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Initial Management

General Principles

  • Patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team; the Pituitary Society has defined criteria for Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence to guide improvements in care delivery.[64]
  • Treatment aims to control hormone hypersecretion and tumor growth, relieve mass effect, preserve or restore pituitary and visual function, and manage comorbidities; in acromegaly, normalization of IGF-I and growth hormone are the primary therapeutic aims, with tumor shrinkage, symptom relief, management of complications and improved quality of life as additional goals.[24]
  • For adenomas requiring treatment, first-line therapy is usually transsphenoidal surgery, except for prolactinomas, for which medical therapy with bromocriptine or cabergoline is usually first-line.[16]
  • Surgery is recommended for pituitary incidentalomas with a visual field deficit, other visual abnormalities such as ophthalmoplegia, or neurological compromise due to compression; a lesion abutting the optic nerves or chiasm; pituitary apoplexy with visual disturbance; or hypersecretion other than prolactin.[45]

Treatment Selection Algorithm

 
 
 
 
 
 
Pituitary adenoma confirmed
Define subtype, size, Knosp grade, visual status and pituitary function
Review by a multidisciplinary pituitary team
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prolactinoma
 
Somatotroph, corticotroph or thyrotroph tumor
 
Nonfunctioning adenoma with visual deficit, chiasmal contact or neurological compromise
 
Nonfunctioning adenoma without mass effect
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cabergoline as first-line therapy, including macroadenomas
Transsphenoidal surgery as an alternative first-line option for selected microprolactinomas
Surgery or radiotherapy for resistance or intolerance
 
Transsphenoidal surgery by an experienced pituitary surgeon
Medical therapy, repeat surgery or radiotherapy for persistent disease
Primary medical therapy if surgery is not possible
 
Transsphenoidal surgery
Observation or radiotherapy for residual tumor
Radiotherapy or radiosurgery for progression or recurrence
 
Surveillance MRI and visual assessment
Repeat pituitary function testing for macroadenomas or tumor growth
Surgery if growth threatens the optic apparatus

[16][36][52][45][65]

Pituitary Apoplexy

  • Classical pituitary apoplexy is a medical emergency in which rapid replacement with hydrocortisone may be life-saving, and patients should be referred to a multidisciplinary team that includes a neurosurgeon and an endocrinologist. Surgery is indicated in patients with worsening neurological symptoms; for the majority of patients, it is unclear whether conservative or surgical management carries the best outcome.[31]
  • Conservative management is increasingly used in selected patients without important visual acuity or field defects and with normal consciousness, because a wait-and-see approach may also provide excellent outcomes for oculomotor palsy, pituitary function and subsequent tumor growth; studies comparing the two approaches were retrospective and uncontrolled.[30]
  • In a meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies comprising 908 patients, there was no statistically significant difference between conservative and surgical management in recovery of ophthalmoplegia (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.18), visual field (RR 1.09, 0.91 to 1.3), visual acuity (RR 1.05, 0.87 to 1.26), hypopituitarism (RR 1.37, 0.81 to 2.32) or tumor recurrence (RR 0.74, 0.34 to 1.61), although more severe cases typically underwent surgery.[66]
  • After apoplexy, careful monitoring for recurrence of tumor growth is required.[31]
 
 
Suspected pituitary apoplexy
Sudden severe headache, vomiting, visual impairment, ophthalmoplegia or decreased consciousness
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Immediate management
Draw blood for cortisol and other pituitary hormones
Hydrocortisone without delay for hemodynamic instability, altered consciousness, reduced visual acuity or a severe visual field defect; otherwise guided by the cortisol level
Correct fluid and electrolyte disturbances
Urgent MRI, or CT if MRI is unavailable
Joint neurosurgical, endocrine and ophthalmological assessment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severe or deteriorating visual acuity, visual field defect or level of consciousness
 
Stable or improving neuro-ophthalmic signs with normal consciousness
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transsphenoidal decompression by an experienced pituitary surgeon
Continue glucocorticoid replacement and monitor fluid balance and sodium
 
Conservative management with close neuro-ophthalmic and endocrine monitoring
Proceed to surgery if signs deteriorate

[31][30]

Perioperative Management

  • A Pituitary Society Delphi process among 55 invited pituitary endocrinologists reached strong consensus on 68.6% (24/35) of statements on perioperative endocrine evaluation and management, and on 88% (31/35) with less strict criteria; consensus was not reached on assessment of immediate postoperative remission in acromegaly or Cushing's disease.[67]
  • In a randomized trial of patients with an intact hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis undergoing transsphenoidal surgery, withholding perioperative glucocorticoids (n = 20) was compared with intravenous hydrocortisone 100 mg followed by dexamethasone (n = 23). Mean postoperative 8 am cortisol was higher without steroids (745 ± 359 versus 386 ± 193 nmol/L, P = .001), fewer patients were discharged on glucocorticoids (12% versus 42%, P = .07), postoperative complications did not differ, and permanent adrenal insufficiency occurred in 8%. Perioperative steroids can be safely withheld when the axis is intact, and their administration may interfere with postoperative assessment of the axis.[68]
  • Management of hypopituitarism during pituitary surgery and other surgery is addressed by the Endocrine Society hormone replacement guideline.[62]
  • In endogenous Cushing's syndrome, an international Delphi panel of 18 experts recommended considering thromboprophylaxis at diagnosis and continuing it for 3 months after biochemical remission, with standard weight-based prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin as the preferred agent, and reconsidering prophylaxis perioperatively and around inferior petrosal sinus sampling.[50]
  • In newly diagnosed acromegaly, 6 months of preoperative octreotide increased the postoperative cure rate in macroadenomas (13 of 26, 50%, versus 4 of 25, 16%, P = 0.017), although the overall difference (45% versus 23%) was not significant (P = 0.11).[69] The Endocrine Society suggests against routine preoperative medical therapy to improve biochemical outcome, but suggests preoperative somatostatin receptor ligands to reduce surgical risk in patients with severe pharyngeal thickness and sleep apnea or high-output heart failure.[43]

Medical Therapy

Prolactinoma

  • Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice. In a randomized trial of 459 women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea, stable normoprolactinemia was achieved in 83% with cabergoline (0.5 to 1.0 mg twice weekly) versus 59% with bromocriptine (2.5 to 5.0 mg twice daily) (P < 0.001); ovulatory cycles or pregnancy occurred in 72% versus 52%, adverse effects in 68% versus 78% (P = 0.03), and discontinuation for intolerance in 3% versus 12% (P < 0.001).[2]
  • The Endocrine Society recommends dopamine agonist therapy to lower prolactin, decrease tumor size and restore gonadal function in symptomatic microprolactinomas and in macroprolactinomas, preferring cabergoline because of its higher efficacy in normalizing prolactin and higher frequency of tumor shrinkage, and suggests that asymptomatic microprolactinomas need not be treated with dopamine agonists.[28]
  • In a meta-analysis, biochemical control was achieved in 81% (95% CI 75 to 87) of patients during dopamine agonist treatment, with side effects in 26% (95% CI 13 to 41).[52]
  • Withdrawal: tapering and discontinuation may be considered after at least 2 years of therapy in patients with a normal prolactin level and no visible tumor remnant.[28] In a meta-analysis of 19 studies with 743 patients, normoprolactinemia persisted after withdrawal in 21% (95% CI 14 to 30), in 32% with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, 21% with microprolactinomas and 16% with macroprolactinomas; success was most likely when cabergoline had been used for at least 2 years.[70] A later meta-analysis estimated long-term remission after withdrawal at 34% (95% CI 26 to 46).[52]
  • Adverse effects: impulse control disorders (with hypersexuality mostly in men), depression, mania and psychosis may occur regardless of prior psychiatric history, and sex, type of dopamine agonist, dose and duration of therapy did not correlate with psychiatric pathology.[55] In hyperprolactinemia treated with cabergoline for at least 6 months, tricuspid regurgitation was more prevalent than in controls (OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.79 to 7.8), but no tricuspid valve dysfunction was diagnosed as a result of clinical symptoms.[56]
  • Resistance or intolerance: options include transsphenoidal surgery and radiotherapy and, for aggressive tumors, temozolomide.[36][20]

Acromegaly

  • Medical therapy is used for persistent disease after surgery, as primary therapy when surgery is not possible, and while awaiting the effect of radiotherapy; the Pituitary Society updated the treatment algorithm to incorporate oral octreotide and combination therapy.[43][71]
Agent Mechanism Pivotal evidence Key outcomes Notable adverse effects
Octreotide LAR and lanreotide (first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands) Somatostatin receptor type 2 agonism reducing growth hormone secretion Active comparator in a randomized trial of 358 medically naive patients Biochemical control (growth hormone below 2.5 μg/L and normal IGF-1) at 12 months in 19.2% with octreotide LAR Gastrointestinal effects characteristic of somatostatin receptor ligands
Pasireotide LAR Multireceptor somatostatin receptor ligand Randomized trial versus octreotide LAR in 358 medically naive patients; PAOLA trial in 198 patients inadequately controlled on first-generation ligands Biochemical control 31.3% versus 19.2% (P = .007); in PAOLA, 15% with 40 mg and 20% with 60 mg versus 0% with continued first-generation ligands Hyperglycemia-related adverse events in 57.3% versus 21.7%; diabetes in 21% and 26% versus 8% in PAOLA
Oral octreotide capsules Oral formulation of octreotide CHIASMA OPTIMAL (placebo-controlled, 56 patients) and MPOWERED (versus injectable ligands, 92 randomized patients) IGF-1 normalization maintained in 58.2% versus 19.4% with placebo; biochemical response maintained in 91% versus 100% with injectable ligands, meeting non-inferiority Gastrointestinal effects
Paltusotine Once-daily oral nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor type 2 agonist PATHFNDR-1 (switch from injected ligands, 58 patients) and PATHFNDR-2 (medically untreated, 111 patients) IGF-I maintained at or below the upper limit of normal in 83.3% versus 3.6%; IGF-I normalization in 55.6% versus 5.3% at 24 weeks Mild, transitory gastrointestinal effects
Octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) Once-monthly subcutaneous octreotide depot allowing self-administration ACROINNOVA 1 (72 patients controlled on standard care) IGF-1 at or below the upper limit of normal in 72.2% versus 37.5% with placebo Safety consistent with standard somatostatin receptor ligands
Pegvisomant Growth hormone receptor antagonist 12-week randomized trial in 112 patients IGF-I normalized in 10% (placebo), 54% (10 mg/day), 81% (15 mg/day) and 89% (20 mg/day) Adverse effect incidence similar to placebo in the pivotal trial
Cabergoline Dopamine agonist Individual-patient meta-analysis of 15 nonrandomized studies (227 patients) IGF-I normalized in 34% as monotherapy and in 52% when added to a somatostatin analog, even with normoprolactinemia See dopamine agonist adverse effects

[54][72][12][13][14][15][73][3][74]

  • In PATHFNDR-1, mean growth hormone was maintained below 1.0 ng/mL in 87.0% of patients receiving paltusotine versus 27.8% receiving placebo.[14] In PATHFNDR-2, IGF-I decreased in 92.6% of paltusotine-treated patients within the first 4 weeks, IGF-I below 1.3 times the upper limit of normal was achieved in 66.7% versus 14.0%, and pituitary tumor volume was stable or reduced.[15]
  • In CHIASMA OPTIMAL, growth hormone below 2.5 ng/mL was maintained in 77.7% with oral octreotide versus 30.4% with placebo, and 75% of patients receiving oral octreotide completed the trial on oral therapy.[12]
  • Management of acromegaly comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension and arthritis, was updated by the 16th Acromegaly Consensus Conference.[48]

Cushing's Disease

  • Surgical resection is generally the first-line approach; the choice of second-line treatment, including medication, bilateral adrenalectomy and radiation therapy, must be individualized, and comorbidities require adjunctive treatment.[75][61]
  • Metyrapone is an additional steroidogenesis inhibitor, and cabergoline may be used in selected patients, as outlined in consensus management algorithms.[61]
Agent Class Pivotal evidence Key outcomes Notable adverse effects
Osilodrostat 11-beta-hydroxylase inhibitor LINC 3 (137 patients, randomized withdrawal) and LINC 4 (73 patients, placebo-controlled) Complete response maintained in 86% versus 29% after randomized withdrawal (OR 13.7, 95% CI 3.7 to 53.4); mean urinary free cortisol at or below the upper limit of normal in 77% versus 8% at week 12 and in 81% at week 36 Nausea (42%), headache (34%), fatigue (28%) and adrenal insufficiency (28%) in LINC 3; hypocortisolism in 51% and adrenal hormone precursor-related events in 42%
Levoketoconazole Steroidogenesis inhibitor SONICS (94 patients, single-arm) and LOGICS (44 patients randomized to withdrawal) 31% (29 of 94) responders after 6 months of maintenance; loss of response in 95.5% with placebo versus 40.9% with continued treatment Alanine aminotransferase above 3 times the upper limit of normal in 11%; QT interval prolongation; adrenal insufficiency
Ketoconazole Steroidogenesis inhibitor French retrospective multicenter study (200 patients) Normal urinary free cortisol in 49.3% at last follow-up and at least a 50% decrease in 25.6% Discontinuation for poor tolerance in 20.5%; liver enzyme elevation below 5 times normal in 13.5% and above 5 times normal in 2.5%, without fatal hepatitis
Pasireotide Pituitary-directed somatostatin receptor ligand with high affinity for somatostatin receptor subtype 5 Twice-daily subcutaneous phase 3 trial (162 patients) and once-monthly LAR phase 3 trial (150 patients) Primary end point met by 12 of 82 patients (600 μg) and 21 of 80 (900 μg); with LAR, mean urinary free cortisol normalized at month 7 in 41.9% (10 mg) and 40.8% (30 mg) Hyperglycemia-related adverse events in 118 of 162 with the subcutaneous formulation; with LAR, hyperglycemia in 49% and 47% and cholelithiasis in 20% and 45%
Mifepristone Glucocorticoid receptor antagonist SEISMIC (50 patients, open-label) Glucose area-under-the-curve response in 60% of patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance; diastolic blood pressure response in 38% of patients with hypertension; clinical improvement in 87% Fatigue, nausea, headache, hypokalemia, arthralgia, vomiting, edema and endometrial thickening
Relacorilant Investigational selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator GRACE (152 enrolled; 62 randomized to withdrawal) Loss of hypertension control more frequent after withdrawal to placebo (proportion difference 34%; OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.77; P = 0.022) No cases of excessive glucocorticoid receptor antagonism, adrenal insufficiency, drug-induced hypokalemia or drug-induced QT prolongation

[76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]

  • With subcutaneous pasireotide, glucose and glycated hemoglobin rose soon after treatment initiation and then stabilized, and glucose-lowering medication was started in 74 of 162 patients.[81]
  • With mifepristone, mean glycated hemoglobin decreased from 7.43 ± 1.52% to 6.29 ± 0.99% in patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance.[83]
  • Most members of a Pituitary Society Delphi panel considered that block-and-replace regimens can be used in patients with cyclical or severe Cushing's syndrome, and the panel agreed that restoration of circadian rhythm is a treatment goal.[63]

TSH-Secreting Adenomas

  • Surgery is the treatment of choice. In cases of surgical failure, somatostatin analogs normalize TSH secretion in more than 90% of patients. Failure to recognize a TSH-secreting adenoma may result in inappropriate thyroid ablation, which results in a significant increase in tumor mass.[18]

Clinically Nonfunctioning Adenomas

  • The Congress of Neurological Surgeons evidence-based guideline addresses medical therapy, radiation therapy and observation alongside surgery for nonfunctioning adenomas.[65]
  • In a single-center, open-label, 2-year randomized trial in residual nonfunctioning adenoma after transsphenoidal surgery, cabergoline (n = 59) compared with nonintervention (n = 57) resulted in tumor shrinkage in 28.8% versus 10.5%, stabilization in 66.1% versus 73.7% and enlargement in 5.1% versus 15.8% (P = 0.01); tumor dopamine D2 receptor expression was not associated with response, and no major side effects occurred.[85]

Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Metastatic PitNETs

  • Patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary expert team. Temozolomide monotherapy is the first-line chemotherapy after failure of standard therapies; response should be evaluated after 3 cycles, and responders should continue treatment for at least 6 months in total. In the guideline's systematic review, a positive treatment effect was seen in 47% (95% CI 36 to 58) of temozolomide-treated patients.[20]
  • In the 2016 ESE survey, temozolomide was the first-line chemotherapy in 157 patients and resulted in complete response in 6%, partial response in 31%, stable disease in 33% and progressive disease in 30% at the end of treatment (median 9 cycles). Responses were more frequent with concomitant radiotherapy, complete responses occurred only with low MGMT expression, and clinically functioning tumors were more likely to respond; 25%, 40% and 48% of patients with complete response, partial response and stable disease, respectively, progressed after a median follow-up of 12 months, and other oncological drugs produced partial response in 20%.[21]
  • In a subsequent survey of 171 patients, temozolomide in 156 patients resulted in complete response in 9.6%, partial response in 30.1%, stable disease in 28.1% and progressive disease in 32.2%; partial regression was achieved with bevacizumab in 1 of 10, immune checkpoint inhibitors in 1 of 6 and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in 3 of 11 patients.[22]

Procedural / Surgical Therapy

Transsphenoidal Surgery

  • Transsphenoidal surgery is first-line therapy for somatotroph,[43] corticotroph[75][61] and thyrotroph[18] tumors and for nonfunctioning adenomas that cause mass effect or approach the optic chiasm.[45][65]
  • In the prospective multicenter TRANSSPHER study of nonfunctioning adenomas, gross-total resection was achieved in 80.0% (60/75) of microscopic and 83.7% (139/166) of endoscopic procedures (P = 0.47), although the microscopic surgeons were more experienced. Volumetric extent of resection, length of stay and unplanned readmissions were similar; new hormone deficiency at 6 months was more frequent after microscopic surgery (28.4% versus 9.7%, OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.7), and microscopic procedures were shorter.[51]
  • Increasing Knosp grade predicts surgically confirmed cavernous sinus invasion and lower rates of gross-total resection and endocrine remission; in grade 4 adenomas, both rates were 0%.[19]
  • Prolactinoma: in a meta-analysis, long-term remission was 67% (95% CI 60 to 74) after transsphenoidal surgery and 83% (95% CI 76 to 90) in microprolactinomas, compared with 34% and 36%, respectively, after dopamine agonist withdrawal, with 0% surgical mortality.[52] Refinement of endoscopic neurosurgery allows definitive cure of some patients with permanent discontinuation of medical therapy.[36]
  • Acromegaly: repeat surgery is suggested for residual intrasellar disease, and surgical debulking of tumors unlikely to be fully resected may improve the response to subsequent medical therapy.[43]
  • Cushing's disease: initial resection of the corticotroph tumor is recommended unless surgery is not possible or is unlikely to reduce glucocorticoid excess significantly.[75]
  • Surgery should be performed by experienced pituitary surgeons in specialized centers.[64]

Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery

  • Radiotherapy is a second- or third-line treatment after transsphenoidal surgery for functioning and nonfunctioning adenomas; its use has declined with improvements in surgical technique and medical therapy and with a shift from fractionated radiotherapy to stereotactic radiosurgery in appropriately selected patients.[86]
  • A Pituitary Society Delphi panel of 29 international experts reached consensus on 24 of 27 statements (88.9%): radiotherapy indication and timing should be assessed by multidisciplinary tumor boards that include a radiation oncologist, the technique should be determined by patient and adenoma characteristics, hormone secretion in functioning adenomas should be controlled while awaiting the maximal effect of radiotherapy, and follow-up beyond 10 years is required to assess delayed efficacy, recurrence and side effects.[86]
  • In a multicenter study of 512 patients with nonfunctioning adenomas (93.6% with prior resection) treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery at a median tumor margin dose of 16 Gy, actuarial tumor control was 98%, 95%, 91% and 85% at 3, 5, 8 and 10 years. Smaller adenoma volume was associated with progression-free survival; new or worsened hypopituitarism occurred in 21%, new or progressive cranial nerve deficits in 9%, and new or worsening optic nerve dysfunction in 6.6%.[53]
  • In aggressive tumors, responses to temozolomide were more frequent with concomitant radiotherapy.[21]

Bilateral Adrenalectomy

  • Bilateral adrenalectomy is a second-line option in Cushing's disease that must be individualized.[75] In a Swedish nationwide cohort, bilateral adrenalectomy was independently associated with increased mortality among patients in remission.[59]

Long-Term Management

Hormone Replacement

  • Replacement of pituitary hormone deficiencies should avoid both over-replacement and under-replacement to decrease the risk of comorbidities.[62]
  • Free T4 rather than TSH is used to monitor replacement in central hypothyroidism, and glucocorticoid replacement is usually given as hydrocortisone 15 to 20 mg daily in single or divided doses, with education on stress dosing.[62]
  • Untreated gonadotropin deficiency was associated with excess mortality (SMR 2.97, 2.13 to 4.13, compared with 1.42, 0.97 to 2.07, when treated).[57]
  • The term arginine vasopressin deficiency is recommended in place of central diabetes insipidus.[11]

Surveillance of Nonfunctioning Adenomas and Incidentalomas

  • The Endocrine Society recommends MRI at 6 months for macroincidentalomas and at 1 year for microincidentalomas, thereafter progressively less frequently if unchanged; visual field examination at 6 months and yearly for lesions abutting or compressing the optic apparatus; and endocrine testing at 6 months and yearly for macroincidentalomas.[45]
  • UK cohort data support less intensive protocols. Delaying the first follow-up MRI to 3 years and avoiding hormonal re-evaluation in the absence of growth or clinical manifestations is a safe approach for nonfunctioning microadenomas,[17] and in macroadenomas not in contact with the optic chiasm the first follow-up scan can be delayed to 1 year, while new hypopituitarism in stable tumors is rare.[47]
  • After radiotherapy, follow-up for more than 10 years is required.[86]

Acromegaly

  • Biochemical remission is the primary measure of treatment outcome but should be interpreted within the clinical context; follow-up should combine biochemical evaluation, imaging for residual or recurrent adenoma, and assessment of clinical signs, complications and comorbidities, with referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment.[60]
  • The Endocrine Society suggests an age-normalized IGF-I and a random growth hormone below 1.0 μg/L as therapeutic goals.[43]
  • Mortality is normalized with biochemical control.[58]

Cushing's Disease

  • Late-night salivary cortisol is widely used for monitoring after pituitary surgery and after medical or radiation therapy.[63]
  • Several comorbidities persist even after remission and can affect quality of life, so they require continued management.[29]
  • Excess mortality persists in remission, highlighting the importance of continued active surveillance, adequate hormone replacement and evaluation of cardiovascular risk and mental health.[59]

Prolactinoma

  • Hyperprolactinemia recurs in a considerable proportion of patients after dopamine agonist withdrawal, so prolactin should be monitored after discontinuation.[70]

Special Populations

Pregnancy

  • Counseling of premenopausal women about their chance of conceiving and about the optimal preconception treatment should start at diagnosis. The normal physiological changes of pregnancy must be considered when interpreting endocrine tests, and hormone replacement doses may need adjustment across the trimesters.[35]
  • Pituitary gland size increases in healthy pregnancy and some adenomas enlarge, so women with macroadenomas or tumors near the optic chiasm are at risk of visual impairment; pituitary apoplexy is a rare acute complication that may require surgery. Most pregnant women with pituitary adenomas should be managed by a multidisciplinary team in a specialized center.[35]
  • In women with prolactinomas, dopamine agonist therapy is generally discontinued once pregnancy is confirmed.[28]
  • In acromegaly, discontinuation of long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands and pegvisomant approximately 2 months before attempts to conceive is suggested.[43]

Children and Adolescents

  • Prolactinomas accounted for 75% of pituitary adenomas diagnosed between 0 and 20 years of age.[39]
  • Genetic causes should be considered: X-linked acrogigantism presents with gigantism in early childhood,[6] germline AIP mutations cause large adenomas in children, adolescents and young adults, with gigantism in more than one third of affected somatotropinoma patients,[25] and MEN1 recommendations address both adults and children.[27]
  • Prolactinoma management in children is addressed in the AME/ICCE position statement.[36]

Hereditary Syndromes

  • MEN1 mutation carriers require periodic clinical, biochemical and radiological screening.[27]
  • AIP-mutated adenomas raise clinical challenges to successful treatment.[25]

Older Adults

  • Nonfunctioning adenomas predominate after the age of 60 years.[39] In conservatively managed nonfunctioning macroadenomas, new hypopituitarism was rare in stable tumors, supporting surveillance in selected patients.[47]

Patients Receiving Dopamine Agonists

  • All physicians who prescribe dopamine agonists need increased awareness of impulse control disorders, depression, mania and other psychoses, which can occur regardless of prior psychiatric history.[55]

Case Studies

Case #1

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993). "Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings". Neurosurgery. 33 (4): 610–617. doi:10.1227/00006123-199310000-00008. PMID 8232800.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Webster J, Piscitelli G, Polli A, Ferrari CI, Ismail I, Scanlon MF (1994). "A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. Cabergoline Comparative Study Group". N Engl J Med. 331 (14): 904–909. doi:10.1056/NEJM199410063311403. PMID 7915824.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Trainer PJ, Drake WM, Katznelson L, Freda PU, Herman-Bonert V, van der Lely AJ, et al. (2000). "Treatment of acromegaly with the growth hormone-receptor antagonist pegvisomant". N Engl J Med. 342 (16): 1171–1177. doi:10.1056/NEJM200004203421604. PMID 10770982.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Vierimaa O, Georgitsi M, Lehtonen R, Vahteristo P, Kokko A, Raitila A, et al. (2006). "Pituitary adenoma predisposition caused by germline mutations in the AIP gene". Science. 312 (5777): 1228–1230. doi:10.1126/science.1126100. PMID 16728643.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N, Dantony E, Cortet-Rudelli C, Viennet G, et al. (2013). "A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up". Acta Neuropathol. 126 (1): 123–135. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1084-y. PMID 23400299.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Trivellin G, Daly AF, Faucz FR, Yuan B, Rostomyan L, Larco DO, et al. (2014). "Gigantism and acromegaly due to Xq26 microduplications and GPR101 mutation". N Engl J Med. 371 (25): 2363–2374. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408028. PMID 25470569.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Reincke M, Sbiera S, Hayakawa A, Theodoropoulou M, Osswald A, Beuschlein F, et al. (2015). "Mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 cause Cushing's disease". Nat Genet. 47 (1): 31–38. doi:10.1038/ng.3166. PMID 25485838.
  8. ↑ Asa SL, Casar-Borota O, Chanson P, Delgrange E, Earls P, Ezzat S, et al. (2017). "From pituitary adenoma to pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET): an International Pituitary Pathology Club proposal". Endocr Relat Cancer. 24 (4): C5–C8. doi:10.1530/ERC-17-0004. PMID 28264912.
  9. ↑ 9.00 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.11 9.12 Asa SL, Mete O, Perry A, Osamura RY (2022). "Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors". Endocr Pathol. 33 (1): 6–26. doi:10.1007/s12022-022-09703-7. PMID 35291028 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Ho K, Fleseriu M, Kaiser U, Salvatori R, Brue T, Lopes MB, et al. (2021). "Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature Workshop: Does Adenoma Stand the Test of Time?". J Endocr Soc. 5 (3): bvaa205. doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa205. PMID 33604494 Check |pmid= value (help).
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Arima H, Cheetham T, Christ-Crain M, Cooper D, Drummond J, Gurnell M, et al. (2023). "Changing the Name of Diabetes Insipidus: A Position Statement of the Working Group for Renaming Diabetes Insipidus". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 108 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac547. PMID 36355385 Check |pmid= value (help).
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Samson SL, Nachtigall LB, Fleseriu M, Gordon MB, Bolanowski M, Labadzhyan A, et al. (2020). "Maintenance of Acromegaly Control in Patients Switching From Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Octreotide". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 105 (10): e3785–e3797. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa526. PMID 32882036 Check |pmid= value (help).
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Fleseriu M, Dreval A, Bondar I, Vagapova G, Macut D, Pokramovich YG, et al. (2022). "Maintenance of response to oral octreotide compared with injectable somatostatin receptor ligands in patients with acromegaly: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 10 (2): 102–111. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00296-5. PMID 34953531 Check |pmid= value (help).
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Gadelha MR, Casagrande A, Strasburger CJ, Bidlingmaier M, Snyder PJ, Guitelman MA, et al. (2025). "Acromegaly Disease Control Maintained After Switching From Injected Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Paltusotine". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 110 (1): 228–237. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae385. PMID 38828555 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Biller B, Casagrande A, Elenkova A, Boguszewski CL, Jallad RS, Hu B, et al. (2026). "Rapid and Sustained Response of Biochemically Uncontrolled Acromegaly to Once-daily Oral Paltusotine Treatment". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 111 (4): e1050–e1063. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf579. PMID 41128642 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  16. ↑ 16.00 16.01 16.02 16.03 16.04 16.05 16.06 16.07 16.08 16.09 16.10 Tritos NA, Miller KK (2023). "Diagnosis and Management of Pituitary Adenomas: A Review". JAMA. 329 (16): 1386–1398. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.5444. PMID 37097352 Check |pmid= value (help).
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 Hamblin R, Fountas A, Lithgow K, Loughrey PB, Bonanos E, Shinwari SK, et al. (2023). "Natural history of non-functioning pituitary microadenomas: results from the UK non-functioning pituitary adenoma consortium". Eur J Endocrinol. 189 (1): 87–95. doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvad070. PMID 37345849 Check |pmid= value (help).
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 18.7 18.8 Beck-Peccoz P, Lania A, Beckers A, Chatterjee K, Wemeau JL (2013). "2013 European thyroid association guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of thyrotropin-secreting pituitary tumors". Eur Thyroid J. 2 (2): 76–82. doi:10.1159/000351007. PMID 24783044.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 Micko AS, Wöhrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E (2015). "Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification". J Neurosurg. 122 (4): 803–811. doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS141083. PMID 25658782.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 Raverot G, Burman P, McCormack A, Heaney A, Petersenn S, Popovic V, et al. (2018). "European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas". Eur J Endocrinol. 178 (1): G1–G24. doi:10.1530/EJE-17-0796. PMID 29046323.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 McCormack A, Dekkers OM, Petersenn S, Popovic V, Trouillas J, Raverot G, et al. (2018). "Treatment of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas: results of a European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) survey 2016". Eur J Endocrinol. 178 (3): 265–276. doi:10.1530/EJE-17-0933. PMID 29330228.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.4 Burman P, Trouillas J, Losa M, McCormack A, Petersenn S, Popovic V, et al. (2022). "Aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas, characteristics and management of 171 patients". Eur J Endocrinol. 187 (4): 593–605. doi:10.1530/EJE-22-0440. PMID 36018781 Check |pmid= value (help).
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 Melmed S, Kaiser UB, Lopes MB, Bertherat J, Syro LV, Raverot G, et al. (2022). "Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma". Endocr Rev. 43 (6): 1003–1037. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnac010. PMID 35395078 Check |pmid= value (help).
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 Fleseriu M, Langlois F, Lim D, Varlamov EV, Melmed S (2022). "Acromegaly: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 10 (11): 804–826. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00244-3. PMID 36209758 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 25.7 Beckers A, Aaltonen LA, Daly AF, Karhu A (2013). "Familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) and the pituitary adenoma predisposition due to mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene". Endocr Rev. 34 (2): 239–277. doi:10.1210/er.2012-1013. PMID 23371967.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Hernández-Ramírez LC, Gabrovska P, Dénes J, Stals K, Trivellin G, Tilley D, et al. (2015). "Landscape of Familial Isolated and Young-Onset Pituitary Adenomas: Prospective Diagnosis in AIP Mutation Carriers". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 100 (9): E1242–E1254. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1869. PMID 26186299.
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 27.6 27.7 Brandi ML, Pieterman C, English KA, Lines KE, Shariq OA, Marini F, et al. (2025). "Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): recommendations and guidelines for best practice". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 13 (8): 699–721. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00119-6. PMID 40523372 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  28. ↑ 28.00 28.01 28.02 28.03 28.04 28.05 28.06 28.07 28.08 28.09 Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, et al. (2011). "Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96 (2): 273–288. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1692. PMID 21296991.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 Gadelha M, Gatto F, Wildemberg LE, Fleseriu M (2023). "Cushing's syndrome". Lancet. 402 (10418): 2237–2252. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01961-X. PMID 37984386 Check |pmid= value (help).
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 30.5 Briet C, Salenave S, Bonneville JF, Laws ER, Chanson P (2015). "Pituitary Apoplexy". Endocr Rev. 36 (6): 622–645. doi:10.1210/er.2015-1042. PMID 26414232.
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 31.2 31.3 31.4 31.5 31.6 Rajasekaran S, Vanderpump M, Baldeweg S, Drake W, Reddy N, Lanyon M, et al. (2011). "UK guidelines for the management of pituitary apoplexy". Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 74 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03913.x. PMID 21044119.
  32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 32.4 32.5 32.6 Famini P, Maya MM, Melmed S (2011). "Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96 (6): 1633–1641. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0168. PMID 21470998.
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 Fernández-Balsells MM, Murad MH, Barwise A, Gallegos-Orozco JF, Paul A, Lane MA, et al. (2011). "Natural history of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and incidentalomas: a systematic review and metaanalysis". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96 (4): 905–912. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1054. PMID 21474687.
  34. ↑ Langlois F, Varlamov EV, Fleseriu M (2022). "Hypophysitis, the Growing Spectrum of a Rare Pituitary Disease". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 107 (1): 10–28. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgab672. PMID 34528683 Check |pmid= value (help).
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 35.3 Luger A, Broersen L, Biermasz NR, Biller B, Buchfelder M, Chanson P, et al. (2021). "ESE Clinical Practice Guideline on functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in pregnancy". Eur J Endocrinol. 185 (3): G1–G33. doi:10.1530/EJE-21-0462. PMID 34425558 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.4 Cozzi R, Ambrosio MR, Attanasio R, Battista C, Bozzao A, Caputo M, et al. (2022). "Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) and International Chapter of Clinical Endocrinology (ICCE). Position statement for clinical practice: prolactin-secreting tumors". Eur J Endocrinol. 186 (3): P1–P33. doi:10.1530/EJE-21-0977. PMID 35000899 Check |pmid= value (help).
  37. ↑ Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, et al. (2004). "The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review". Cancer. 101 (3): 613–619. doi:10.1002/cncr.20412. PMID 15274075.
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A (2006). "High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liege, Belgium". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 91 (12): 4769–4775. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1668. PMID 16968795.
  39. ↑ 39.00 39.01 39.02 39.03 39.04 39.05 39.06 39.07 39.08 39.09 Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JA (2010). "Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK)". Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 72 (3): 377–382. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03667.x. PMID 19650784.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 Agustsson TT, Baldvinsdottir T, Jonasson JG, Olafsdottir E, Steinthorsdottir V, Sigurdsson G, et al. (2015). "The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955-2012: a nationwide population-based study". Eur J Endocrinol. 173 (5): 655–664. doi:10.1530/EJE-15-0189. PMID 26423473.
  41. ↑ 41.0 41.1 41.2 41.3 Olsson DS, Nilsson AG, Bryngelsson IL, Trimpou P, Johannsson G, Andersson E (2015). "Excess Mortality in Women and Young Adults With Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenoma: A Swedish Nationwide Study". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 100 (7): 2651–2658. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1475. PMID 25946030.
  42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 Kajal S, Ahmad Y, Halawi A, Gol M, Ashley W (2024). "Pituitary apoplexy: a systematic review of non-gestational risk factors". Pituitary. 27 (4): 320–334. doi:10.1007/s11102-024-01412-0. PMID 38935252 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  43. ↑ 43.00 43.01 43.02 43.03 43.04 43.05 43.06 43.07 43.08 43.09 Katznelson L, Laws ER, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, et al. (2014). "Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 99 (11): 3933–3951. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2700. PMID 25356808.
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, et al. (2008). "The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 93 (5): 1526–1540. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0125. PMID 18334580.
  45. ↑ 45.00 45.01 45.02 45.03 45.04 45.05 45.06 45.07 45.08 45.09 Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L, Molitch ME, Montori VM, Post KD, et al. (2011). "Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96 (4): 894–904. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1048. PMID 21474686.
  46. ↑ Giraldi E, Allen JW, Ioachimescu AG (2023). "Pituitary Incidentalomas: Best Practices and Looking Ahead". Endocr Pract. 29 (1): 60–68. doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2022.10.004. PMID 36270609 Check |pmid= value (help).
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 Fountas A, Lithgow K, Loughrey PB, Bonanos E, Shinwari SK, Mitchell K, et al. (2025). "Conservatively managed non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas-cohort study from the UK Non-functioning Pituitary Adenoma Consortium". Eur J Endocrinol. 192 (5): 680–690. doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvaf091. PMID 40305776 Check |pmid= value (help).
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 48.2 Giustina A, di Filippo L, Fleseriu M, Pivonello R, Petersenn S, Wass J, et al. (2026). "Consensus on acromegaly complications: an update". Pituitary. 29 (3). doi:10.1007/s11102-026-01639-z. PMID 42050227 Check |pmid= value (help).
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 49.2 Limumpornpetch P, Morgan AW, Tiganescu A, Baxter PD, Nyawira Nyaga V, Pujades-Rodriguez M, et al. (2022). "The Effect of Endogenous Cushing Syndrome on All-cause and Cause-specific Mortality". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 107 (8): 2377–2388. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac265. PMID 35486378 Check |pmid= value (help).
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 Isand K, Arima H, Bertherat J, Dekkers OM, Feelders RA, Fleseriu M, et al. (2025). "Delphi panel consensus on recommendations for thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in endogenous Cushing's syndrome: a position statement". Eur J Endocrinol. 192 (3): R17–R27. doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvaf017. PMID 39973025 Check |pmid= value (help).
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 Little AS, Kelly DF, White WL, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Chicoine MR, et al. (2020). "Results of a prospective multicenter controlled study comparing surgical outcomes of microscopic versus fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: the Transsphenoidal Extent of Resection (TRANSSPHER) Study". J Neurosurg. 132 (4): 1043–1053. doi:10.3171/2018.11.JNS181238. PMID 30901746.
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Zandbergen IM, de Vries F, Broersen L, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Pereira AM, et al. (2020). "Surgery as a Viable Alternative First-Line Treatment for Prolactinoma Patients. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 105 (3): e32–e41. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgz144. PMID 31665485. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 Sheehan JP, Starke RM, Mathieu D, Young B, Sneed PK, Chiang VL, et al. (2013). "Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the management of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a multicenter study". J Neurosurg. 119 (2): 446–456. doi:10.3171/2013.3.JNS12766. PMID 23621595.
  54. ↑ 54.0 54.1 Colao A, Bronstein MD, Freda P, Gu F, Shen CC, Gadelha M, et al. (2014). "Pasireotide versus octreotide in acromegaly: a head-to-head superiority study". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 99 (3): 791–799. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2480. PMID 24423324.
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 55.2 Ioachimescu AG, Fleseriu M, Hoffman AR, Vaughan TB 3rd, Katznelson L (2019). "Psychological effects of dopamine agonist treatment in patients with hyperprolactinemia and prolactin-secreting adenomas". Eur J Endocrinol. 180 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1530/EJE-18-0682. PMID 30400048.
  56. ↑ 56.0 56.1 56.2 Stiles CE, Tetteh-Wayoe ET, Bestwick J, Steeds RP, Drake WM (2019). "A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Cardiac Valvulopathy in Patients With Hyperprolactinemia Treated With Cabergoline". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 104 (2): 523–538. doi:10.1210/jc.2018-01071. PMID 30215804.
  57. ↑ 57.0 57.1 57.2 Tomlinson JW, Holden N, Hills RK, Wheatley K, Clayton RN, Bates AS, et al. (2001). "Association between premature mortality and hypopituitarism. West Midlands Prospective Hypopituitary Study Group". Lancet. 357 (9254): 425–431. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04006-x. PMID 11273062.
  58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 58.2 Bolfi F, Neves AF, Boguszewski CL, Nunes-Nogueira VS (2018). "Mortality in acromegaly decreased in the last decade: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Eur J Endocrinol. 179 (1): 59–71. doi:10.1530/EJE-18-0255. PMID 29764907.
  59. ↑ 59.0 59.1 59.2 59.3 Ragnarsson O, Olsson DS, Papakokkinou E, Chantzichristos D, Dahlqvist P, Segerstedt E, et al. (2019). "Overall and Disease-Specific Mortality in Patients With Cushing Disease: A Swedish Nationwide Study". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 104 (6): 2375–2384. doi:10.1210/jc.2018-02524. PMID 30715394.
  60. ↑ 60.0 60.1 60.2 60.3 60.4 Giustina A, Biermasz N, Casanueva FF, Fleseriu M, Mortini P, Strasburger C, et al. (2024). "Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission". Pituitary. 27 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1007/s11102-023-01360-1. PMID 37923946 Check |pmid= value (help).
  61. ↑ 61.0 61.1 61.2 61.3 61.4 61.5 Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Bertherat J, Biermasz NR, et al. (2021). "Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 9 (12): 847–875. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7. PMID 34687601 Check |pmid= value (help).
  62. ↑ 62.0 62.1 62.2 62.3 Fleseriu M, Hashim IA, Karavitaki N, Melmed S, Murad MH, Salvatori R, et al. (2016). "Hormonal Replacement in Hypopituitarism in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 101 (11): 3888–3921. doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2118. PMID 27736313.
  63. ↑ 63.0 63.1 63.2 Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Bancos I, Fukuoka H, Reincke M, Newell-Price J, et al. (2026). "Consensus on Biomarker Utility for ACTH-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome: A Pituitary Society Modified Delphi Panel". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgag279. PMID 42460773 Check |pmid= value (help).
  64. ↑ 64.0 64.1 Casanueva FF, Barkan AL, Buchfelder M, Klibanski A, Laws ER, Loeffler JS, et al. (2017). "Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): A Pituitary Society Statement". Pituitary. 20 (5): 489–498. doi:10.1007/s11102-017-0838-2. PMID 28884415.
  65. ↑ 65.0 65.1 65.2 Aghi MK, Chen CC, Fleseriu M, Newman SA, Lucas JW, Kuo JS, et al. (2016). "Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Management of Patients With Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: Executive Summary". Neurosurgery. 79 (4): 521–523. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001386. PMID 27635956.
  66. ↑ Marin-Castañeda LA, Gorbachev J, Lopez-Zepeda PT, Choque-Ayala LC, Shubhangi F, De Nigris Vasconcellos F, et al. (2024). "Pituitary Apoplexy and the Current Understanding of Its Management: A Meta-Analysis of 908 Patients". World Neurosurg. 190: 371–385.e1. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.103. PMID 39033812 Check |pmid= value (help).
  67. ↑ Tritos NA, Fazeli PK, McCormack A, Mallea-Gil SM, Pineyro MM, Christ-Crain M, et al. (2022). "Pituitary Society Delphi Survey: An international perspective on endocrine management of patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas". Pituitary. 25 (1): 64–73. doi:10.1007/s11102-021-01170-3. PMID 34283370 Check |pmid= value (help).
  68. ↑ Sterl K, Thompson B, Goss CW, Dacey RG, Rich KM, Zipfel GJ, et al. (2019). "Withholding Perioperative Steroids in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Resection for Pituitary Disease: Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial to Assess Safety". Neurosurgery. 85 (2): E226–E232. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy479. PMID 30325449.
  69. ↑ Carlsen SM, Lund-Johansen M, Schreiner T, Aanderud S, Johannesen O, Svartberg J, et al. (2008). "Preoperative octreotide treatment in newly diagnosed acromegalic patients with macroadenomas increases cure short-term postoperative rates: a prospective, randomized trial". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 93 (8): 2984–2990. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0315. PMID 18492760.
  70. ↑ 70.0 70.1 Dekkers OM, Lagro J, Burman P, Jørgensen JO, Romijn JA, Pereira AM (2010). "Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of dopamine agonists: systematic review and meta-analysis". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 95 (1): 43–51. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-1238. PMID 19880787.
  71. ↑ Fleseriu M, Biller B, Freda PU, Gadelha MR, Giustina A, Katznelson L, et al. (2021). "A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines". Pituitary. 24 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11102-020-01091-7. PMID 33079318 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  72. ↑ Gadelha MR, Bronstein MD, Brue T, Coculescu M, Fleseriu M, Guitelman M, et al. (2014). "Pasireotide versus continued treatment with octreotide or lanreotide in patients with inadequately controlled acromegaly (PAOLA): a randomised, phase 3 trial". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2 (11): 875–884. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70169-X. PMID 25260838.
  73. ↑ Ferone D, Freda P, Katznelson L, Gatto F, Kadioğlu P, Maffei P, et al. (2025). "Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot for Acromegaly: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Trial, ACROINNOVA 1". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 110 (6): 1729–1739. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae707. PMID 39378125 Check |pmid= value (help).
  74. ↑ Sandret L, Maison P, Chanson P (2011). "Place of cabergoline in acromegaly: a meta-analysis". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96 (5): 1327–1335. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2443. PMID 21325455.
  75. ↑ 75.0 75.1 75.2 75.3 Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, et al. (2015). "Treatment of Cushing's Syndrome: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 100 (8): 2807–2831. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1818. PMID 26222757.
  76. ↑ Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Findling J, Shimatsu A, et al. (2020). "Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing's disease (LINC 3): a multicentre phase III study with a double-blind, randomised withdrawal phase". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 8 (9): 748–761. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30240-0. PMID 32730798 Check |pmid= value (help).
  77. ↑ Gadelha M, Bex M, Feelders RA, Heaney AP, Auchus RJ, Gilis-Januszewska A, et al. (2022). "Randomized Trial of Osilodrostat for the Treatment of Cushing Disease". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 107 (7): e2882–e2895. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac178. PMID 35325149 Check |pmid= value (help).
  78. ↑ Fleseriu M, Pivonello R, Elenkova A, Salvatori R, Auchus RJ, Feelders RA, et al. (2019). "Efficacy and safety of levoketoconazole in the treatment of endogenous Cushing's syndrome (SONICS): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, single-arm trial". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 7 (11): 855–865. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30313-4. PMID 31542384.
  79. ↑ Pivonello R, Zacharieva S, Elenkova A, Tóth M, Shimon I, Stigliano A, et al. (2022). "Levoketoconazole in the treatment of patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study (LOGICS)". Pituitary. 25 (6): 911–926. doi:10.1007/s11102-022-01263-7. PMID 36085339 Check |pmid= value (help).
  80. ↑ Castinetti F, Guignat L, Giraud P, Muller M, Kamenicky P, Drui D, et al. (2014). "Ketoconazole in Cushing's disease: is it worth a try?". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 99 (5): 1623–1630. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-3628. PMID 24471573.
  81. ↑ 81.0 81.1 Colao A, Petersenn S, Newell-Price J, Findling JW, Gu F, Maldonado M, et al. (2012). "A 12-month phase 3 study of pasireotide in Cushing's disease". N Engl J Med. 366 (10): 914–924. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1105743. PMID 22397653.
  82. ↑ Lacroix A, Gu F, Gallardo W, Pivonello R, Yu Y, Witek P, et al. (2018). "Efficacy and safety of once-monthly pasireotide in Cushing's disease: a 12 month clinical trial". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 6 (1): 17–26. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30326-1. PMID 29032078.
  83. ↑ 83.0 83.1 Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Findling JW, Molitch ME, Schteingart DE, Gross C, et al. (2012). "Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with Cushing's syndrome". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 97 (6): 2039–2049. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-3350. PMID 22466348.
  84. ↑ Pivonello R, Arnaldi G, Auchus RJ, Badiu C, Busch RS, Cannavò S, et al. (2026). "Efficacy and safety of relacorilant for the treatment of patients with Cushing's syndrome (GRACE): a multicentre, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised-withdrawal study". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 14 (4): 291–304. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00362-6. PMID 41730814 Check |pmid= value (help).
  85. ↑ Batista RL, Musolino N, Cescato V, da Silva GO, Medeiros R, Herkenhoff C, et al. (2019). "Cabergoline in the Management of Residual Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenoma: A Single-Center, Open-Label, 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial". Am J Clin Oncol. 42 (2): 221–227. doi:10.1097/COC.0000000000000505. PMID 30540568. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  86. ↑ 86.0 86.1 86.2 Castinetti F, Piazzola C, Ayuk J, Kosmin M, Losa M, Marcus HJ, et al. (2026). "Pituitary Society Delphi consensus on the role of radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas". Pituitary. 29 (5). doi:10.1007/s11102-026-01759-6. PMID 42776342 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WikiDoc Sources