Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADI}} [[GRN} {{SCh}}
{{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADI}}{{SCh}}


==Overview==
==Overview==

Revision as of 03:23, 17 January 2017

Peritonitis main page

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective

CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2]Shivani Chaparala M.B.B.S [3]

Overview

  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was known to emerge from different stages as follows:
  • Bacteria migrating from the infected bowel (due to the altered bowel flora ) seen in hepatic cirrhosis enter the portal blood and escape the "bacterial filter" in the liver since a high proportion of the portal flow in cirrhotics may bypass the liver sinusoids.
  • Having entered into the systemic circulation the bacteria are more likely to survive since cirrhotics have a reduced resistance to infection.
  • In such conditions, they are more prone to cause bacteremia and life-threatening sepsis.
  • A few case reports have appeared in the French and American literature but the condition attracted little attention until 1958.
  • In 1958, Caroli and Platteborse described 20 patients with cirrhosis developing coliform septicemia and peritonitis, in whom Gram-negative organisms were cultured from blood, ascitic fluid, or both.
  • Kerr and colleagues in 1963 published two papers on the ascitic fluid infection as a complication of cirrhosis.[1]
  • Prof Harold O. Conn was the first to use term "spontaneous bacterial peritonitis" in English literature in 1964.
  • Krencker 1907; Brule et al 1939; Cachin 1955; Navasa et al 1999 described that ascitic fluid infections were most common in patients with cirrhosis.
  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), reported by Caroli and Platteborse (1958) has had its importance increased since Kerr and colleagues[1](1963) and Conn (1964) published two papers about this cirrhosis complication almost simultaneously.[2]
  • Kerr and colleagues (1963) described 11 episodes of ascitic fluid infection in 9 cirrhotic patients while Harold O.Conn , M.D, a world-renowned hepatologist (1964) introduced the term “spontaneous bacterial peritonitis” for the first time in English literature.
  • Later in the history, SBP was studied extensively by many renowned researchers and health care professionals as this condition was seen among many patients with cirrhosis, which has lead to the thorough understanding and recognition of SBP.

Historical perspective

  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was first described in medical literature in 1885 by Da Bozzolo.
  • The first reports of SBP appeared in the German and French literatures between 1907 and 1958.
  • Krencker 1907; Brule et al 1939; Cachin 1955; Navasa et al 1999 described that ascitic fluid infections were most common in patients with cirrhosis.
  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), reported by Caroli and Platteborse (1958) has had its importance increased since Kerr and colleagues[1](1963) and Conn (1964) published two papers about this cirrhosis complication almost simultaneously.[1][2]
  • Kerr and colleagues (1963) described 11 episodes of ascitic fluid infection in 9 cirrhotic patients while Harold O.Conn , M.D, a world-renowned hepatologist (1964) introduced the term “spontaneous bacterial peritonitis” for the first time in English literature.[3][4][5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 KERR DN, PEARSON DT, READ AE (1963). "INFECTION OF ASCITIC FLUID IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC CIRRHOSIS". Gut. 4: 394–8. PMC 1413490. PMID 14084751.
  2. 2.0 2.1 CONN HO (1964). "SPONTANEOUS PERITONITIS AND BACTEREMIA IN LAENNEC'S CIRRHOSIS CAUSED BY ENTERIC ORGANISMS. A RELATIVELY COMMON BUT RARELY RECOGNIZED SYNDROME". Ann Intern Med. 60: 568–80. PMID 14138877.
  3. Ribeiro TC, Chebli JM, Kondo M, Gaburri PD, Chebli LA, Feldner AC (2008). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: How to deal with this life-threatening cirrhosis complication?". Ther Clin Risk Manag. 4 (5): 919–25. PMC 2621420. PMID 19209274.
  4. Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe (2004). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a historical perspective". Journal of Hepatology. 41 (4): 522–527. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2004.09.001. ISSN 0168-8278.
  5. Crossley IR, Williams R (1985). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Gut. 26 (4): 325–31. PMC 1432517. PMID 3884467.

Template:WH Template:WS