Salmonellosis historical perspective: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


==Overview==
==Overview==
Salmonella enterica, originally called Salmonella choleraesuis, was discovered by scientist Theobald Smith in 1885 and was named after Daniel E. Salmon, an American veterinary pathologist. Smith originally believed the bacteria was responsible for causing hog cholera, but the disease was later discovered to be a viral infection with a secondary infection due to Salmonella.


==Historical Perspective==
==Historical Perspective==
 
Salmonela was initially isolated from the intestines of pigs, by Salmon, an American veterinary pathologist. The bacteria was first associated with hog cholera by Theobald Smith in 1885. However, the disease was later discovered to be associated with a viral infection, with secondary infection due to Salmonella.
<!--
<!--
Salmonellae are named for the pathologist Salmon, who first isolated Salmonella choleraesuis from porcine intestine.1 Salmonella are effec- tive commensals and pathogens that cause a spectrum of diseases in humans and animals, including domesticated and wild mammals, rep- tiles, birds, and insects. Some Salmonella serotypes, such as Salmonella Typhi, Salmonella Paratyphi, and Salmonella Sendai, are highly adapted to humans and have no other known natural hosts, whereas others, such as Salmonella Typhimurium, have a broad host range and can infect a wide variety of animal hosts and humans. Some Salmonella serotypes, such as Dublin (cattle) and Arizonae (reptiles), are mostly adapted to an animal species and only occasionally infect humans. The widespread distribution of Salmonella in the environment, their increasing prevalence in the global food chain, and their virulence and adaptability have an enormous medical, public health, and economic impact worldwide.
Before the 19th century, typhus and typhoid fever were confused. Though various clinical distinctions were proposed, none reliably dis- tinguished these syndromes. In 1829 in Paris, P. Ch. A. Louis separated typhoid from other fevers on the basis of intestinal lymph node and spleen pathology.2 He also described the clinical phenomena of rose spots, intestinal perforation, and hemorrhage. In the English literature, William Jenner in 1850 settled the question of whether typhus and typhoid were different diseases.3 He distinguished typhoid based on the pathologic evidence of enlargement of the Peyer’s patches and mesenteric lymph nodes. Jenner also noted that prior attacks of typhoid protected against subsequent attacks; this was not the case for typhus. In 1869, Wilson proposed the term enteric fever as an alterna- tive to typhoid fever, given the anatomic site of infection.4 Though enteric fever remains a more accurate term, the use of the term typhoid persists today.
Before the 19th century, typhus and typhoid fever were confused. Though various clinical distinctions were proposed, none reliably dis- tinguished these syndromes. In 1829 in Paris, P. Ch. A. Louis separated typhoid from other fevers on the basis of intestinal lymph node and spleen pathology.2 He also described the clinical phenomena of rose spots, intestinal perforation, and hemorrhage. In the English literature, William Jenner in 1850 settled the question of whether typhus and typhoid were different diseases.3 He distinguished typhoid based on the pathologic evidence of enlargement of the Peyer’s patches and mesenteric lymph nodes. Jenner also noted that prior attacks of typhoid protected against subsequent attacks; this was not the case for typhus. In 1869, Wilson proposed the term enteric fever as an alterna- tive to typhoid fever, given the anatomic site of infection.4 Though enteric fever remains a more accurate term, the use of the term typhoid persists today.



Revision as of 17:52, 22 August 2014

Salmonellosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Salmonellosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Salmonellosis historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Salmonellosis historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Salmonellosis historical perspective

CDC on Salmonellosis historical perspective

Salmonellosis historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Salmonellosis historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Salmonellosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Salmonellosis historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jolanta Marszalek, M.D. [2] João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3]

Overview

Historical Perspective

Salmonela was initially isolated from the intestines of pigs, by Salmon, an American veterinary pathologist. The bacteria was first associated with hog cholera by Theobald Smith in 1885. However, the disease was later discovered to be associated with a viral infection, with secondary infection due to Salmonella.

References

Template:WikiDoc Sources