Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy

Revision as of 06:34, 11 June 2017 by Shyam Patel (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Graft-versus-host disease

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Graft-versus-host disease from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Echocardiograph and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy

CDC on Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy

Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy in the news

Blogs on Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Graft-versus-host disease medical therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Shyam Patel [2]

Overview

Medical Therapy

Corticosteroids, such as prednisone or methylprednisolone, are the standard of care in acute GVHD[1] and chronic GVHD. Prednisone is an oral steroids, and methylprednisolone is an intravenous steroid. Typical dose of methylprednisolone is 2 to 2.5 mg/kg daily.[2] The use of these corticosteroids is designed to suppress the T-cell mediated immune onslaught on the host tissues; however in high doses this immune-suppression raises the risk of infections and cancer relapse. Therefore it is desirable to taper off the post-transplant high level steroid doses to lower levels, at which point the appearance of mild GVHD may be welcome, especially in HLA mis-matched patients, as it is typically associated with a graft-versus-tumor effect. Steroids can be tapers quickly or slowly after the induction phase of steroids results in adequate response.

Other immunosuppressive agents that are typically used include cyclosporine and tacrolimus.[2] These are immunophilins that suppress T cell responses. Mycophenolate mofetil has been used for prophylaxis for GvHD.[2] Other modalities of therapy that have been used, besides oral or intravenous steroids or immunophilins, include ex vivo T cell depletion and in vivo T cell depletion.[2] The latter can be accomplished via anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab.

For steroid-refractory GvHD, there are a few options available, though the data is not robust.

  • Ruxolitinib: This is an inhibitor of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), has been used.[3]
  • mTOR inhibitors: These agents inhibitor the mammalian target of rapamycin. Everolimus is an mTOR inhibitor.[3]
  • Anti-TNF agents: Examples of anti-TNF agents include etanercept and adalilumab. TNF is involved in the inflammatory response, so TNF blockade results in immunosuppression.[3]

References

  1. Goker H, Haznedaroglu IC, Chao NJ (2001). "Acute graft-vs-host disease: pathobiology and management". Exp. Hematol. 29 (3): 259–77. PMID 11274753.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Jacobsohn DA, Vogelsang GB (2007). "Acute graft versus host disease". Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2: 35. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-2-35. PMC 2018687. PMID 17784964.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Assouan D, Lebon D, Charbonnier A, Royer B, Marolleau JP, Gruson B (2017). "Ruxolitinib as a promising treatment for corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease". Br J Haematol. doi:10.1111/bjh.14679. PMID 28444730.

Template:WS Template:WH