Brown-Forsythe test

Revision as of 13:19, 17 June 2008 by LBiller (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [1] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Overview

In statistics, when a usual one-way ANOVA is performed, it is assumed that the group variances are statistically equal. If this assumption is not valid, then the resulting F-test is invalid. The Brown-Forsythe test is a statistical test for the equality of group variances based on performing an ANOVA on a transformation of the response variable.

Transformation

The transformed response variable is constructed to measure the spread in each group. Let

<math>

z_{ij}=\left\vert y_{ij} - \tilde{y}_j \right\vert </math>

where <math>\tilde{y}_j</math> is the median of group j. In order to correct for the artificial zeros that come about with odd numbers of observations in a group, any zij that equals zero is replaced by the next smallest zij in group j. The Brown-Forsythe test statistic is the model F statistic from a one way ANOVA on zij:

<math>F = \frac{(N-p)}{(p-1)} \frac{\sum_{j=1}^{p} n_j (z_{\cdot j}-z_{\cdot\cdot})^2} {\sum_{j=1}^{p}\sum_{i=1}^{N} (z_{ij}-z_{\cdot j})^2}</math>

where p is the number of groups, nj is the number of observations in group j, and N is the total number of observations.

If the variances are indeed heterogenous, techniques that allow for this (such as the Welch one-way ANOVA) may be used instead of the usual ANOVA.

Comparison with Levene's test

Levene's test uses the mean instead of the median. Although the optimal choice depends on the underlying distribution, the definition based on the median is recommended as the choice that provides good robustness against many types of non-normal data while retaining good statistical power. If one has knowledge of the underlying distribution of the data, this may indicate using one of the other choices. Brown and Forsythe performed Monte Carlo studies that indicated that using the trimmed mean performed best when the underlying data followed a Cauchy distribution (a heavy-tailed distribution) and the median performed best when the underlying data followed a Chi-square distribution with four degrees of freedom (a heavily skewed distribution). Using the mean provided the best power for symmetric, moderate-tailed, distributions.

See also

External links

References

  • Brown, Morton B. and Forsythe, Alan B. (1974), Robust Tests for Equality of Variances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364-367.

Template:NIST-PD


Navigation WikiDoc | WikiPatient | Popular pages | Recently Edited Pages | Recently Added Pictures

Table of Contents In Alphabetical Order | By Individual Diseases | Signs and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Lab Tests | Drugs

Editor Tools Become an Editor | Editors Help Menu | Create a Page | Edit a Page | Upload a Picture or File | Printable version | Permanent link | Maintain Pages | What Pages Link Here
There is no pharmaceutical or device industry support for this site and we need your viewer supported Donations | Editorial Board | Governance | Licensing | Disclaimers | Avoid Plagiarism | Policies
Linked-in.jpg
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox