Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective

Revision as of 17:29, 27 February 2018 by Mahda (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diaphragmatic Paralysis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Diaphragmatic Paralysis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Guidelines for Management

Case Studies

Case #1

Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective

CDC on Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective

Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Diaphragmatic paralysis historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

Historical Perspective

Discovery

Diaphragmatic paralysis first suggested as a therapeutic measure in lung disease by Steurtz (1911), who did simple phrenicotomy. Felix (1922) showed in 25% of cases this was ineffective owing to the presence of an accessory phrenic, and suggested phrenic exairesis, i.e. complete evulsion of the phrenic nerve. Goetze (1922) suggested radical phrenicotomy, i.e. division of the phrenic and excision of the nerve to the subclavius.Effects of diaphragmatic paralysis.-The diaphragm rises to the full expiratory position (4-8 cm.). Paradoxical movement (Kienböch's phenomenon) on affected side. Muscle atrophies. Collapse of the lung produced, affecting base and apex also. Lung volume reduced by (1/6)th to (1/3)rd.Physical signs.-Indrawing of the epigastrium. Thoracic breathing. Litten's sign absent. Less resistance to abdominal palpation on affected side. Diminished resonance at border of sternum and at base. Deficient inspiratory murmur at base.Radiography.-Paradoxical movement. Bittorf's test.

  • Diaphragmatic paralysis was first suggested by Steurtz, in 1911 during simple phrenicotomy for treatment of lung disease.[1]
  • Thomas Harris, in 1892, stated that depression of the epigastric and hypochondriac regions on deep inspiration not always indicative of diaphragmatic paralysis.
  • The association between [important risk factor/cause] and [disease name] was made in/during [year/event].
  • In [year], [scientist] was the first to discover the association between [risk factor] and the development of [disease name].
  • In [year], [gene] mutations were first implicated in the pathogenesis of [disease name].

Outbreaks

  • There have been several outbreaks of [disease name], which are summarized below:

Landmark Events in the Development of Treatment Strategies

  • In 1911,
  • In [year], [diagnostic test/therapy] was developed by [scientist] to treat/diagnose [disease name].

Impact on Cultural History

Famous Cases

References

  1. Campbell AJ (October 1934). "Diaphragmatic Paralysis: A Critical Review of its Use as a Therapeutic Measure in Respiratory Disease: (Section of Medicine)". Proc. R. Soc. Med. 27 (12): 1555–62. PMC 2205656. PMID 19989972.

Template:WH Template:WS