Renal artery stenosis resident survival guide: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 110: Line 110:
Algorithm based on the 2013 AHA Guidelines Recommendations for Management of Patients with PAD.<ref name="pmid23457117">{{cite journal| author=Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH et al.| title=Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. | journal=Circulation | year= 2013 | volume= 127 | issue= 13 | pages= 1425-43 | pmid=23457117 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828b82aa | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23457117  }} </ref>
Algorithm based on the 2013 AHA Guidelines Recommendations for Management of Patients with PAD.<ref name="pmid23457117">{{cite journal| author=Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH et al.| title=Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. | journal=Circulation | year= 2013 | volume= 127 | issue= 13 | pages= 1425-43 | pmid=23457117 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828b82aa | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23457117  }} </ref>


Stenting efficacy can be defined by clinical or technical end points. Recent studies reveal that even though there are high technical success rates, the clinical end points are inconsistently and modestly modified. <ref name="pmid24245566">{{cite journal| author=Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Jamerson K, Henrich W, Reid DM et al.| title=Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2014 | volume= 370 | issue= 1 | pages= 13-22 | pmid=24245566 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa1310753 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24245566  }}</ref>
Recent studies reveal that athough there are high technical success rates with angioplasty/stenting, the clinical end points are inconsistently and modestly modified. <ref name="pmid24245566">{{cite journal| author=Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Jamerson K, Henrich W, Reid DM et al.| title=Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2014 | volume= 370 | issue= 1 | pages= 13-22 | pmid=24245566 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa1310753 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24245566  }}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 15:35, 6 January 2014

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Definition

This section provides a short and straight to the point definition of the disease or symptom in one sentence.

Causes

Life Threatening Causes

Life-threatening causes include conditions which may result in death or permanent disability within 24 hours if left untreated.

Common Causes

Clinical Clues to the Diagnosis of RAS

 
 
 
 
 
Determine if one or more of the above is present
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ScenarioLevel of evidence
1.Onset of hypertension before the age of 30 years or severe hypertension after the age of 55Class I; LOE B
2. Accelerated, resistant, or malignant hypertensionClass I; LOE C
3. Development of new azotemia or worsening renal function after administration of an ACE inhibitor or ARB agentClass I; LOE B
4. Unexplained atrophic kidney or size discrepancy between kidneys of greater than 1.5 cmClass I; LOE B
5. Sudden, unexplained pulmonary edemaClass I; LOE B
6. Unexplained renal dysfunction, including individuals starting renal replacement therapyClass IIa; LOE B
7. Multi-vessel CADClass IIb; LOE B
8. Unexplained CHFClass IIb; LOE C
9. Refractory anginaClass IIb; LOE C
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If one or more of the above are present, proceed to further diagnostic testing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noninvasive Imaging
 
 
 
Invasive Imaging
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Duplex ultrasound

❑ Gadolinium enhanced MRA

CT angiography
 
 
 
Abdominal aortography to assess the renal arteries during coronary and peripheral angiography
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Negative noninvasive test but with high clinical suspicion
 
Evidence of RAS
 
Evidence of RAS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Evidence of RAS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Confirmed RAS, proceed to treatment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Algorithm based on the 2013 AHA Guidelines Recommendations for Management of Patients with PAD.[1]

Indications for Renal Revascularization

IndicationLevel of evidence
1.Hemodynamically significant RAS with recurrent, unexplained CHF or sudden, unexplained pulmonary edemaClass I; LOE B
2. RAS with:
  • Accelerated, resistant, or malignant hypertension
  • Hypertension with unilateral small kidney
  • Hypertension with medication intolerance
Class IIa; LOE B
3.RAS and CRI with bilateral RAS or RAS to solitary functioning kidneyClass IIa; LOE B
4. RAS and unstable anginaClass IIa; LOE B
5. Asymptomatic bilateral or solitary viableʰ kidney with a hemodynamically significant RASClass IIb; LOE C
6. Asymptomatic unilateral hemodynamically significant RAS in a viable* kidneyClass IIb; LOE C
7. RAS and CRI with unilateral RAS (2 kidneys present)Class IIb; LOE C

ʰViable means kidney linear length greater than 7 cm.

Shown below is a table of the definition of hemodynamically significant RAS.[1]

Hemodynamically significant RAS
≥70% by visual estimation
≥70% by intravascular ultrasound measurement≥70%
50-70% RAS with a systolic gradient of ≥20 mm Hg or a mean gradient of ≥10 mm Hg.

Shown below there is an algorithm of therapeutic options after any of the indications for revascularization are met.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Presence of one or more indications for revascularization:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Renal Angioplasty/Stent
 
 
 
Renal artery surgery
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Atherosclerotic RAS
 
 
 
Fibromuscular dysplasia RAS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Renal stent placement is indicated for ostial atherosclerotic RAS lesions that meet the clinical criteria for intervention
 
 
 
Balloon angioplasty with bailout stent placement if necessary is recommended for fibromuscular dysplasia lesions
 


Algorithm based on the 2013 AHA Guidelines Recommendations for Management of Patients with PAD.[1]

Recent studies reveal that athough there are high technical success rates with angioplasty/stenting, the clinical end points are inconsistently and modestly modified. [2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH; et al. (2013). "Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Circulation. 127 (13): 1425–43. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828b82aa. PMID 23457117.
  2. Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Jamerson K, Henrich W, Reid DM; et al. (2014). "Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis". N Engl J Med. 370 (1): 13–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310753. PMID 24245566.


Template:WikiDoc Sources