Dyspareunia epidemiology and demographics: Difference between revisions
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Epidemiology and Demographics== | ==Epidemiology and Demographics== | ||
===Overview=== | ===Overview=== | ||
The prevalence of dyspareunia is unknown of the overall population. Nonetheless, it is estimated that 15% of women in North America notify recurrent pain during intercourse. | The prevalence of dyspareunia is unknown of the overall population. Nonetheless, it is estimated that 15% of women in North America notify recurrent pain during intercourse.Retrospective studies have cited a range from 1.5% to 70%. | ||
===Prevalence=== | ===Prevalence=== | ||
The prevalence of dyspareunia is unknown of the overall population. Nonetheless, it is estimated that 15% of women in North America notify recurrent pain during intercourse.<ref name=DSMV>{{cite book | title = Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5 | publisher = American Psychiatric Association | location = Washington, D.C | year = 2013 | isbn = 0890425558}}</ref><ref name="pmid8532266">{{cite journal |vauthors=Jamieson DJ, Steege JF |title=The prevalence of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, and irritable bowel syndrome in primary care practices |journal=Obstet Gynecol |volume=87 |issue=1 |pages=55–8 |date=January 1996 |pmid=8532266 |doi=10.1016/0029-7844(95)00360-6 |url=}}</ref> | The prevalence of dyspareunia is unknown of the overall population. Nonetheless, it is estimated that 15% of women in North America notify recurrent pain during intercourse.The prevalence of dyspareunia varies widely depending on the population being sampled and how it is defined. Retrospective studies have cited a range from 1.5% to 70%.[<ref name=DSMV>{{cite book | title = Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5 | publisher = American Psychiatric Association | location = Washington, D.C | year = 2013 | isbn = 0890425558}}</ref><ref name="pmid8532266">{{cite journal |vauthors=Jamieson DJ, Steege JF |title=The prevalence of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, and irritable bowel syndrome in primary care practices |journal=Obstet Gynecol |volume=87 |issue=1 |pages=55–8 |date=January 1996 |pmid=8532266 |doi=10.1016/0029-7844(95)00360-6 |url=}}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 01:59, 21 September 2020
Dyspareunia Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Dyspareunia epidemiology and demographics On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Dyspareunia epidemiology and demographics |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Dyspareunia epidemiology and demographics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jesus Rosario Hernandez, M.D. [2]
Epidemiology and Demographics
Overview
The prevalence of dyspareunia is unknown of the overall population. Nonetheless, it is estimated that 15% of women in North America notify recurrent pain during intercourse.Retrospective studies have cited a range from 1.5% to 70%.
Prevalence
The prevalence of dyspareunia is unknown of the overall population. Nonetheless, it is estimated that 15% of women in North America notify recurrent pain during intercourse.The prevalence of dyspareunia varies widely depending on the population being sampled and how it is defined. Retrospective studies have cited a range from 1.5% to 70%.[[1][2]
References
- ↑ Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association. 2013. ISBN 0890425558.
- ↑ Jamieson DJ, Steege JF (January 1996). "The prevalence of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, and irritable bowel syndrome in primary care practices". Obstet Gynecol. 87 (1): 55–8. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00360-6. PMID 8532266.