Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
* Probably due to disturbances in the intestinal peristalsis, gastric acid and mucosal immunity in cirrhotic patients.  
* Probably due to disturbances in the intestinal peristalsis, gastric acid and mucosal immunity in cirrhotic patients.  
* Studies have shown that the incidenceof bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine was significantly higher in liver cirrhotic patients with history of SBP than in those without SBP (70% vs. 20%).
* Studies have shown that the incidenceof bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine was significantly higher in liver cirrhotic patients with history of SBP than in those without SBP (70% vs. 20%).
* Once bacteria reach a critical concentration in the gut lumen, they “spill over”, and escape the gut, “translocating” to mesenteric lymph nodes.Then they enter lymph, blood, and eventually ascitic fluid.<ref name="pmid7890896">{{cite journal| author=Runyon BA, Squier S, Borzio M| title=Translocation of gut bacteria in rats with cirrhosis to mesenteric lymph nodes partially explains the pathogenesis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=J Hepatol | year= 1994 | volume= 21 | issue= 5 | pages= 792-6 | pmid=7890896 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7890896  }} </ref>
===Intestinal permeability===
===Intestinal permeability===
===Hepatic Reticulo endothelial system activity===
===Hepatic Reticulo endothelial system activity===

Revision as of 14:20, 16 January 2017

Peritonitis main page

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology in the news

Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

SBP is a result of culmination of the inability of the gut to contain bacteria and failure of the immune system to eradicate the organisms once they have escaped.[1]

Pathophysiology

SBP is a result of culmination of the inability of the gut to contain bacteria and failure of the immune system to eradicate the organisms once they have escaped. Following steps may explain the underlying process in a comprehensive way:

  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is thought to result from a combination of factors related to cirrhosis and ascites such as:

Natural barriers

Routes of infection

  • Hematogenous
  • Lymphogenous
  • Transmural migration through an intact bowel wall from the intestinal lumen
  • Bacterial translocation: Enteric bacteria from the bowel lumen → Mesenteric lymph nodes → Systemic circulation (via the thoracic duct)
  • Enteric bacteria → Portal vein → liver / portosystemic shunts ( in portal hypertension) → Systemic circulation.
  • Conn and Fessel postulated that organisms removed from the systemic circulation by the liver contaminate hepatic lymph and pass through the permeable lymphatic walls into the ascitic fluid
  • Enteric bacteria may also gain access to the peritoneal cavity by traversing directly the intact intestinal wall.

Hypo-motility

  • Distal propulsion of luminal contents by intestinal peristalsis is a critical factor in the inhibition of bacterial colonization and replication in the proximal gastro-intestinal tract, which leads to bacterial overgrowth.

Intestinal mucosal permeability

Altered microbial flora

Intestinal bacterial overgrowth

  • Probably due to disturbances in the intestinal peristalsis, gastric acid and mucosal immunity in cirrhotic patients.
  • Studies have shown that the incidenceof bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine was significantly higher in liver cirrhotic patients with history of SBP than in those without SBP (70% vs. 20%).
  • Once bacteria reach a critical concentration in the gut lumen, they “spill over”, and escape the gut, “translocating” to mesenteric lymph nodes.Then they enter lymph, blood, and eventually ascitic fluid.[2]

Intestinal permeability

Hepatic Reticulo endothelial system activity

Porto-systemic shunting

Phagocytic response

Serum factors

Bacterial translocation

Routes of transmission

Reticulo endothelial dysfunction

Alterations in the systemic immune response

Ascitic fluid defense mechanisms

Cytokine response

    • Prolonged bacteremia secondary to compromised host defenses
    • Intrahepatic shunting of colonized blood and
    • Defective bactericidal activity within the ascitic fluid.[3] Contrary to earlier theories, transmucosal migration of bacteria from the gut to the ascitic fluid is no longer considered to play a major role in the etiology of SBP.[4][1]

With respect to compromised host defenses, patients with severe acute or chronic liver disease are often deficient in complement and may also have malfunctioning of the neutrophilic and reticuloendothelial systems.[5]

As for the significance of ascitic fluid proteins, it was demonstrated that cirrhotic patients with ascitic protein concentrations below 1 g/dL were 10 times more likely to develop SBP than individuals with higher concentrations.[6] It is thought that the antibacterial, or opsonic, activity of ascitic fluid is closely correlated with the protein concentration.[7] Additional studies have confirmed the validity of the ascitic fluid protein concentration as the best predictor of the first episode of SBP.[5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Sheer TA, Runyon BA (2005). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Dig Dis. 23 (1): 39–46. doi:10.1159/000084724. PMID 15920324.
  2. Runyon BA, Squier S, Borzio M (1994). "Translocation of gut bacteria in rats with cirrhosis to mesenteric lymph nodes partially explains the pathogenesis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". J Hepatol. 21 (5): 792–6. PMID 7890896.
  3. Runyon BA, Hoefs JC (1984). "Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites: a variant of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Hepatology. 4 (6): 1209–11. doi:10.1002/hep.1840040619. PMID 6500513.
  4. Runyon BA (1988). "Patients with deficient ascitic fluid opsonic activity are predisposed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Hepatology. 8 (3): 632–5. doi:10.1002/hep.1840080332. PMID 3371881.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Alaniz C, Regal RE (2009) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a review of treatment options. P T 34 (4):204-10. PMID: 19561863
  6. Runyon BA (1986) Low-protein-concentration ascitic fluid is predisposed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology 91 (6):1343-6. PMID: 3770358
  7. Runyon BA, Morrissey RL, Hoefs JC, Wyle FA (1985). "Opsonic activity of human ascitic fluid: a potentially important protective mechanism against spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Hepatology. 5 (4): 634–7. doi:10.1002/hep.1840050419. PMID 4018735.

Template:WH Template:WS