Splenic infarction CT

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Splenic infarction Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Splenic Infarction from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Splenic infarction CT On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Splenic infarction CT

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Splenic infarction CT

CDC on Splenic infarction CT

Splenic infarction CT in the news

Blogs on Splenic infarction CT

Directions to Hospitals Treating Splenic infarction

Risk calculators and risk factors for Splenic infarction CT

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

CT

Computerized tomography scan is the current diagnostic modality of choice. Prior to the CT era, diagnosis of splenic infarct was made most commonly at laparotomy for intra-abdominal catastrophe or on postmortem examination. An abdominal CT scan is the most commonly used modality to confirm the diagnosis,although abdominal ultrasound can also contribute.[1][2][3] In CT; focal infarcts appear as wedge-shaped areas of decreased attenuation that extend to the surface of the spleen. Global infarction can manifest as diffuse areas of decreased attenuation in the spleen and can mimic splenic abscess or tumor. In some cases of global infarction, the splenic periphery remains enhanced due to perfusion from capsular vessels.

Patient #1 Note peripheral enhancement due to perfusion from capsular vessels

Images courtesy of RadsWiki


Patient #2 Note peripheral enhancement due to perfusion from capsular vessels

Images courtesy of RadsWiki

  • Contrast studies clearly depict the classic segmental wedge-shaped, low-attenuation defect. Less frequently, the entire spleen may be infarcted, leaving only a rim of contrast-enhancing capsule.
  • Other modes of diagnosis include radioisotope scans and ultrasound evaluation of the spleen.

References

  1. Görg C, Seifart U, Görg K (2004). "Acute, complete splenic infarction in cancer patient is associated with a fatal outcome". Abdom Imaging. 29 (2): 224–7. doi:10.1007/s00261-003-0108-9. PMID 15290950.
  2. O'Keefe JH, Holmes DR, Schaff HV, Sheedy PF, Edwards WD (1986). "Thromboembolic splenic infarction". Mayo Clin. Proc. 61 (12): 967–72. PMID 3773568. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. Frippiat F, Donckier J, Vandenbossche P, Stoffel M, Boland B, Lambert M (1996). "Splenic infarction: report of three cases of atherosclerotic embolization originating in the aorta and retrospective study of 64 cases". Acta Clin Belg. 51 (6): 395–402. PMID 8997756.

Template:WH Template:WS