In chemistry, a nucleophile (literally nucleus lover as in nucleus and phile) is a reagent that forms a chemical bond to its reaction partner (the electrophile) by donating both bonding electrons. Because nucleophiles donate electrons, they are by definition Lewis bases (see acid-base reaction theories). All molecules or ions with a free pair of electrons can act as nucleophiles, although negative ions (anions) are more potent than neutral reagents. Neutral nucleophilic reactions with solvents such as alcohols and water are named solvolysis.
Nucleophiles may take part in nucleophilic substitution, whereby a nucleophile becomes attracted to a full or partial positive charge on an element and displaces the group it is bonded to.
Nucleophilic is an adjective that describes the affinity of a nucleophile to the nuclei, while nucleophilicity or nucleophile strength refers to the nucleophilic character. Nucleophilicity is often used to compare an atom's relative affinity to another's.
In general, in a row across the periodic table, the more basic the ion (the higher the pKa of the conjugate acid), the more reactive it is as a nucleophile. In a given period, polarizability is more important in the determination of the nucleophilicity: the easier it is to distort the electron cloud around an atom or molecule, the more readily it will react. e.g., the iodide ion (I−) is more nucleophilic than the fluoride ion (F−).
An ambident nucleophile is one that can attack from two or more places, resulting in two or more products. For example, the thiocyanate ion (SCN−) may attack from either the Template:Sulfur or the Template:Nitrogen. For this reason, the SN2 reaction of an alkyl halide with SCN− often leads to a mixture of RSCN (an alkyl thiocyanate) and RNCS (an alkyl isothiocyanate).
In the example below, the oxygen of the hydroxide ion donates an electron to bond with the carbon at the end of the bromopropane molecule. The bond between the carbon and the bromine then undergoes heterolytic fission, with the bromine atom taking the donated electron and becoming the bromide ion (Br−):
Enols are also carbon nucleophiles. The formation of an enol is catalyzed by acid or base. Enols are ambident nucleophiles, but generally nucleophilic at the alpha carbon atom. Enols are commonly used in condensation reactions, including the Claisen condensation and the aldol condensation reactions.
Sulphur nucleophiles are Thiols (HS−).
Sulphur is generally very nucleophilic because of its large size, which makes it easily polarizable, and its lone pairs of electrons (in some cases).
Many schemes have been devised attempting to quantify relative nucleophilic strength. The following empirical data have been obtained by measuring reaction rates for a large number of reactions involving a large number of nucleophiles and electrophiles and linear regression. Nucleophiles displaying the so-called alpha effect are usually omitted in this type of treatment.
<math>\ log(k/k_0) = s*n</math>
This free-energy relationship relates the pseudo first order reaction rate constant (in water at 25°C), k, of a reaction, normalized to the reaction rate, k0, of a standard reaction with water as the nucleophile, to a nucleophilic constant n for a given nucleophile and a substrate constant s that depends on the sensitivity of a substrate to nucleophilic attack (defined as 1 for methyl bromide).
This treatment results in the following values for typical nucleophilic anions: acetate 2.7, chloride 3.0, azide 4.0, hydroxide 4.2, aniline 4.5, iodide 5.0 and thiosulfate 6.4. Typical substrate constants are 0.66 for ethyl tosylate, 0.77 for β-propiolactone, 1.00 for 2,3-epoxypropanol, 0.87 for benzyl chloride and 1.43 for benzoyl chloride.
<math>\ log(k/k_0) = N^+</math>
<math>\ log(k) = N^+ + log(k_0)</math>
where N+ is the nucleophile dependent parameter and k0 the reaction rate constant for water. In this equation a substrate dependent parameter like s in the Swain-Scott equation is absent. The equation states that two nucleophiles react with the same relative reactivity regardless of the nature of the electrophile which is in violation of the Reactivity–selectivity principle. For this reason this equation is also called the constant selectivity relationship.
or diazonium cations:
or (not displayed) ions based on Malachite green. Subsequently many other reaction types were described.
Typical Richie N+ values (in methanol) are: 0.5 for methanol, 5.9 for the cyanide anion, 7.5 for the methoxide anion , 8.5 for the azide anion and 10.7 for the thiophenol anion. The values for the relative cation reactivities are -0.4 for the malachite green cation, +2.6 for the benzenediazonium cation and +4.5 for the tropylium cation.
In the Mayr-Patz equation (1994):
<math>\ log(k) = s(N + E)</math>
The second order reaction rate constant k at 20°C for a reaction is related to a nucleophilicity parameter N, an electrophilicity parameter E and a nucleophile-dependent slope parameter s. The constant s is defined as 1 with 2-methyl-1-pentene as the nucleophile.
and a diverse collection of π-nucleophiles:
Typical N values with s in parenthesis are -4.47 (1.32) for electrophilic aromatic substitution to toluene (1), -1.41 (1.12) for electrophilic addition to 1-phenyl-2-propene (2) and 0.96 (1) for addition to 2-methyl-1-pentene (3), -0.13 (1.21) for reaction with triphenylallylsilane (4), 3.61 (1.11) for reaction with 2-methylfuran (5), +7.48 (0.89) for reaction with isobutenyltributylstannane (6) and +13.36 (0.81) for reaction with the enamine 7.
With E = -9.15 for the S-methyldibenzothiophenium ion, typical nucleophile values N (s) are 15.63 (0.64) for piperidine, 10.49 (0.68) for methoxide and 5.20 (0.89) for water. In short: nucleophilicities towards sp2 or sp3 centers follow the same pattern.
In an effort to unify the above described equations the Mayr equation is rewritten as:
<math>\log(k) = s_Es_N(N + E)</math>
with sE the electrophile-dependent slope parameter and sN the nucleophile-dependent slop parameter. This equation can be rewritten in several ways:
- with sE = 1 for carbocations this equation is equal to the original Mayr-Patz equation of 1994,
- with sN = 0.6 for most n nucleophiles the equation becomes
- <math>\log(k) = 0.6s_EN + 0.6s_EE</math>
- or the original Scott-Swain equation written as:
- <math>\log(k) = \log(k_0) + s_EN</math>
- with sE = 1 for carbocations and sN = 0.6 the equation becomes:
- <math>\log(k) = 0.6N + 0.6E</math>
- or the original Ritchie equation written as:
- <math>\log(k) - \log(k_0) = N^+</math>
- ↑ Gold Book definition Link
- ↑ Ingold, C. K. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1929
- ↑ Lapworth, A. Nature 1925, 115, 625
- ↑ Quantitative Correlation of Relative Rates. Comparison of Hydroxide Ion with Other Nucleophilic Reagents toward Alkyl Halides, Esters, Epoxides and Acyl Halides C. Gardner Swain, Carleton B. Scott J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 1953; 75(1); 141-147. Abstract
- ↑ Gold Book definition Link
- ↑ Gold Book definition Link
- ↑ Nucleophilic reactivities toward cations Calvin D. Ritchie Acc. Chem. Res.; 1972; 5(10); 348-354. Abstract
- ↑ Cation-anion combination reactions. XIII. Correlation of the reactions of nucleophiles with esters Calvin D. Ritchie J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 1975; 97(5); 1170-1179. Abstract
- ↑ Scales of Nucleophilicity and Electrophilicity: A System for Ordering Polar Organic and Organometallic Reactions Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English Volume 33, Issue 9, Date: May 18, 1994, Pages: 938-957 doi:10.1002/anie.199
- ↑ Reference Scales for the Characterization of Cationic Electrophiles and Neutral NucleophilesHerbert Mayr, Thorsten Bug, Matthias F. Gotta, Nicole Hering, Bernhard Irrgang, Brigitte Janker, Bernhard Kempf, Robert Loos, Armin R. Ofial, Grigoriy Remennikov, and Holger Schimmel J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2001; 123(39) pp 9500 - 9512; (Article) doi:10.1021/ja010890y
- ↑ An internet database for reactivity parameters maintained by the Mayr group is available at http://www.cup.uni-muenchen.de/oc/mayr/
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Towards a General Scale of Nucleophilicity? Thanh Binh Phan, Martin Breugst, Herbert Mayr, Angewandte Chemie International Edition Volume 45, Issue 23 , Pages 3869 - 3874 2006 doi:10.1002/anie.200600542
There is no pharmaceutical or device industry support for this site and we need your viewer supported Donations | Editorial Board | Governance | Licensing | Disclaimers | Avoid Plagiarism | Policies