Efficiency (statistics)
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
In statistics, efficiency is one measure of desirability of an estimator. The efficiency of an unbiased statistic T is defined as
where
is the Fisher information of the sample.
Thus e(T) is the minimum possible variance for an unbiased estimator divided by its actual variance.
The Cramér-Rao bound can be used to prove that
:
Efficient estimator
If an unbiased estimator of a parameter
attains e(T) = 1 for all values of the parameter, then the estimator is called efficient.
Equivalently, the estimator achieves equality on the Cramér-Rao inequality for all
.
An efficient estimator is also a minimum variance unbiased estimator. This is because an efficient estimator maintains equality on the Cramér-Rao inequality for all parameter values, which means it attains the minimum variance for all parameters (the definition of an MVU estimator).
An MVU estimator is not necessarily efficient, because "minimum" does not mean equality holds on the Cramér-Rao inequality.
Asymptotic efficiency
For some estimators, they can attain efficiency asymptotically and are thus called asymptotically efficient estimators. This can be the case for some maximum likelihood estimators or for any estimators that attain equality of the Cramér-Rao bound asymptotically.
Examples
Consider a sample of size N drawn from a normal distribution of mean μ and unit variance (i.e.,
).
The sample mean,
, of the sample
, defined as
has variance
.
This is equal to the reciprocal of the Fisher information from the sample (this is clear from the definition) and thus, by the Cramér-Rao inequality, the sample mean is efficient in the sense that its efficiency is unity.
Now consider the sample median.
This is an unbiased and consistent estimator for μ.
For large N the sample median is approximately normally distributed with mean μ and variance
(i.e.,
).
The efficiency is thus
, or about 64%.
Note that this is the asymptotic efficiency — that is, the efficiency in the limit as sample size N tends to infinity.
For finite values of N the efficiency is higher than this (for example, a sample size of 3 gives an efficiency of about 74%).
Many workers prefer the sample median as an estimator of the mean, holding that the loss in efficiency is more than compensated for by its enhanced robustness in terms of its insensitivity to outliers.
Relative efficiency
If T1 and T2 are estimators for the parameter θ, then T1 is said to dominate T2 if:
- its mean squared error (MSE) is smaller for at least some value of θ
- the MSE does not exceed that of T2 for any value of θ.
Formally,
holds for all θ, with strict inequality holding somewhere.
The relative efficiency is defined as
Although e is in general a function of θ, in many cases the dependence drops out; if this is so, e being greater than one would indicate that T1 is preferable, whatever the true value of θ.de:Effizienz (Statistik) it:Efficienza (statistica)
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .

