Copycat suicide

Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiDoc Resources for Copycat suicide

Articles

Most recent articles on Copycat suicide

Most cited articles on Copycat suicide

Review articles on Copycat suicide

Articles on Copycat suicide in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Copycat suicide

Images of Copycat suicide

Photos of Copycat suicide

Podcasts & MP3s on Copycat suicide

Videos on Copycat suicide

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Copycat suicide

Bandolier on Copycat suicide

TRIP on Copycat suicide

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Copycat suicide at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Copycat suicide

Clinical Trials on Copycat suicide at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Copycat suicide

NICE Guidance on Copycat suicide

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Copycat suicide

CDC on Copycat suicide

Books

Books on Copycat suicide

News

Copycat suicide in the news

Be alerted to news on Copycat suicide

News trends on Copycat suicide

Commentary

Blogs on Copycat suicide

Definitions

Definitions of Copycat suicide

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Copycat suicide

Discussion groups on Copycat suicide

Patient Handouts on Copycat suicide

Directions to Hospitals Treating Copycat suicide

Risk calculators and risk factors for Copycat suicide

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Copycat suicide

Causes & Risk Factors for Copycat suicide

Diagnostic studies for Copycat suicide

Treatment of Copycat suicide

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Copycat suicide

International

Copycat suicide en Espanol

Copycat suicide en Francais

Business

Copycat suicide in the Marketplace

Patents on Copycat suicide

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Copycat suicide

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

A copycat suicide is defined as a duplication or copycat of another suicide that the person attempting suicide knows about either from local knowledge or due to accounts or depictions of the original suicide on television and in other media. Sometimes this is known as a Werther effect, following the Werther novel of Goethe.

The well-known suicide serves as a model, in the absence of protective factors, for the next suicide. This is referred to as suicide contagion[1]. They occasionally spread through a school system, through a community, or in terms of a celebrity suicide wave, nationally. This is called a suicide cluster[1]. Examples of celebrities whose suicides have inspired suicide clusters include the American musician Kurt Cobain, the Japanese musician Hide and Yukiko Okada.

To prevent this type of suicide, it is customary in some countries for the media to discourage suicide reports except in special cases.

History

The nature of copycat suicides suggests that it is a phenomenon that must have been with us since the development of civilization. One of the earliest known associations between the media and suicide arose from Goethe’s novel Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (The Sorrows of Young Werther), published in 1774. In that work the hero shoots himself after an ill-fated love, and shortly after its publication there were many reports of young men using the same method to commit suicide. This resulted in a ban of the book in several places. Hence the term "Werther effect", used in the technical literature to designate copycat suicides.[2]

Factors in suicide reporting

Publishing the means of suicides, romanticized and sensationalized reporting, particularly about celebrities, suggestions that there is an epidemic, glorifying the deceased and simplifying the reasons all lead to increases in the suicide rate. Increased rate of suicides has been shown to occur up to ten days after a television report.[3] Studies in Japan[4] and Germany[5] have replicated findings of an imitative effect. Etzersdorfer et al.[6] in an Austrian study showed a strong correlation between the number of papers distributed in various areas and the number of subsequent firearm suicides in each area after a related media report. Higher rates of copycat suicides have been found in those with similarities in race,[4] age, and gender[7] to the victim in the original report. Stack[8] analyzed the results from 42 studies and found that those measuring the effect of a celebrity suicide story were 14.3 times more likely to find a copycat effect than studies that did not. Studies based on a real as opposed to fictional story were 4.03 times more likely to uncover a copycat effect and research based on televised stories was 82% less likely to report a copycat effect than research based on newspapers.

Many people interviewed after the suicide of a relative or friend have a tendency to simplify the issues; their grief can lead to their minimizing or ignoring significant factors. Studies show a high incidence of psychiatric disorders in suicide victims at the time of their death with the total figure ranging from 98%[9] to 87.3%[10] with mood disorders and substance abuse being the two most common. These are often undiagnosed or untreated and treatment can result in reductions in the suicide rate. Reports that minimise the impact of psychiatric disorders contribute to copycat suicides whereas reports that mention this factor and provide help-line contact numbers and advice for where sufferers may gain assistance can reduce suicides.

Social Proof Model

An alternate model to explain copycat suicide, called "social proof" by Cialdini,[11] goes beyond the theories of glorification and simplification of reasons to look at why copycat suicides are so similar, demographically and in actual methods, to the original publicized suicide. In the social proof model, people imitate those who seem similar, despite or even because of societal disapproval. This model is important because it has nearly opposite ramifications for what the media ought to do about the copycat suicide effect than the standard model does.

Journalism codes

Various countries have national journalism codes which range from one extreme of, "Suicide and attempted suicide should in general never be given any mention." (Norway, Brazil) to a more moderate, "In cases of suicide, publishing or broadcasting information in an exaggerated way that goes beyond normal dimensions of reporting with the purpose of influencing readers or spectators should not occur. Photography, pictures, visual images or film depicting such cases should not be made public." (Turkey)[12] Many countries do not have national codes but do have in-house guidelines along similar lines. In the U.S. there are no industry wide standards and a survey of inhouse guides of 16 US daily newspapers showed that only three mentioned the word suicide and none gave guidelines about publishing the method of suicide. Craig Branson, online director of the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE), has been quoted as saying, "Industry codes are very generic and totally voluntary. Most ethical decisions are left to individual editors at individual papers. The industry would fight any attempt to create more specific rules or standards, and editors would no doubt ignore them."[12]

Journalist training

Australia is one of the few countries where there is a concerted effort to teach journalism students about this subject. The Mindframe national media initiative[13] followed an ambivalent response by the Australian Press Council to an earlier media resource kit issued by Suicide Prevention Australia and the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention. The UK-based media ethics charity MediaWise provides training for journalists on reporting suicide related issues.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Halgin, Richard P. (2006). Abnormal Psychology with MindMap II CD-ROM and PowerWeb. McGraw-Hill. p. 62. ISBN 0-07-322872-9. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. "Preventing suicide: A report for media professionals" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2000. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  3. Phillips, David P. (May 1982). "The Impact of Fictional Television Stories on U.S. Adult Fatalities: New Evidence on the Effect of the Mass Media on Violence". The American Journal of Sociology. 87 (6): 1340–59. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  4. 4.0 4.1 Stack S. (1996) The effect of the media on suicide: evidence from Japan, 1955-1985. Suicide Life Threat Behav., 26 (2) :132-42. PMID 8840417
  5. Jonas K. (1992) Modelling and suicide: a test of the Werther effect. Br J Soc Psychol., Dec;31 (Pt 4):295-306. PMID 1472984
  6. Etzersdorfer E, Voracek M, Sonneck G. (2004) A dose-response relationship between imitational suicides and newspaper distribution. Arch Suicide Res., 8(2):137-45. PMID 16006399
  7. Schmidtke A, Häfner H. (1988) The Werther effect after television films: new evidence for an old hypothesis. Psychol Med., Aug;18(3):665-76. PMID 3263660
  8. Stack S (2002). "Media coverage as a risk factor in suicide". Inj. Prev. 8 Suppl 4: IV30–2. PMID 12460954.
  9. Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A, De Leo D, Wasserman D. (2004) Psychiatric diagnoses and suicide: revisiting the evidence. Crisis., 25(4):147-55. PMID 15580849
  10. Arsenault-Lapierre G, Kim C, Turecki G. (2004) Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, Nov 4;4:37. PMID 15527502
  11. Robert B. Cialdini (1993). Influence: the psychology of persuasion. New York: Morrow. p. 336. ISBN 0-688-12816-5.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Norris, Bill (September 2001). "Covering suicide worldwide: media responsibilities" (PDF). The MediaWise Trust. Retrieved 2007-06-09. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  13. "Reporting Suicide: Guidance for journalists" (in English, Spanish, and French). The MediaWise Trust. Retrieved 2007-06-09.

de:Werther-Effekt ko:베르테르 효과 sv:Werther-effekt

Template:WikiDoc Sources