Cooperative binding
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
In biochemistry, a macromolecule exhibits cooperative binding if its affinity for its ligand changes with the amount of ligand already bound.
Cooperative binding is a special case of allostery. Cooperative binding requires that the macromolecule have more than one binding site, since cooperativity results from the interactions between binding sites. If the binding of ligand at one site increases the affinity for ligand at another site, the macromolecule exhibits positive cooperativity. Conversely, if the binding of ligand at one site lowers the affinity for ligand at another site, the protein exhibits negative cooperativity. If the ligand binds at each site independently, the binding is non-cooperative.
The Hill coefficient
The Hill coefficient n provides a quantitative method for characterizing binding cooperativity. The macromolecule is assumed to bind to n ligands simultaneously (where n is to be determined)
to form the complex C. Hence the dissociation constant equals
![K_{d} =
\frac{\left[ \mathrm{P} \right]\left[ \mathrm{L} \right]^{n}}{\left[ \mathrm{C} \right]}](/images/math/4/a/d/4ad896edb1707aeb2fc7444e0fa0a347.png)
The variable θ represents the fraction of binding sites that are occupied on the macromolecule. Therefore, 1 − θ represents the fraction of binding sites that are not occupied, giving the ratio
![\frac{\theta}{1 -\theta} =
\frac{\left[ \mathrm{C} \right]}{\left[ \mathrm{P} \right]} =
\frac{\left[ \mathrm{L} \right]^{n}}{K_{d}}](/images/math/f/9/2/f92f3e7436215c1a95d5be872f1501c2.png)
Taking the logarithm yields an equation linear in n
![\log \left[ \frac{\theta}{1 - \theta} \right] =
n \log \left[ \mathrm{L} \right] - \log K_{d}](/images/math/8/e/c/8ec1ebfacc9b1c5b8de4cf02ea7f0377.png)
Hence, the slope of this line yields n, whereas its intercept is determined by 
.
More generally, plotting ![\log \left[ \frac{\theta}{1 - \theta} \right]](/images/math/0/a/c/0acab60d8252d7ada50db1b4a2ed67c2.png)
versus ![\log \left[ \mathrm{L} \right]](/images/math/e/7/9/e79997a24dad7faca6ca03df5cbcd93b.png)
and taking the slope gives the effective number of ligands n that are binding cooperatively at a particular ligand concentration ![\left[ \mathrm{L} \right]](/images/math/f/1/0/f107ae9c7f1eab2d2971a602d83e811d.png)
. In a non-cooperative system such as myoglobin, the plot is a straight line with slope n = 1 at all ligand concentrations. By contrast, in a system with positive cooperativity such as hemoglobin, the plot begins as a line with slope n = 1, then ramps up to a new line (also with slope n = 1) that is offset upwards. The degree of cooperativity is characterized by the maximum slope n in the "ramping up" region, which is ~2.8 for hemoglobin; thus, at its most cooperative, hemoglobin effectively binds three ligands in concert. The "ramping up" corresponds to an increase in the affinity (decrease in Kd) that occurs as the amount of bound ligand increases. Such plots are sometimes characterized as "sigmoid" due to their subtle "S"-shape.
Mechanisms of cooperativity
Two models were hypothesized to account for the binding cooperativity observed in proteins, the MWC model and the KNF model.
The Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model was advanced by Jacques Monod, Jeffries Wyman and Jean-Pierre Changeux in 1965. It posits that the protein has only two states, a low-affinity state T and a high-affinity state R, where the T state is thermodynamically favored. Hence, at low amounts of bound ligand, the protein prefers the low-affinity T state; however, as the amount of bound ligand increases, the protein comes to prefer the high-affinity state. Structural studies have supported the MWC model and elucidated the R and T states; however, the model cannot explain negative cooperativity.
An alternative model is the sequential or "induced fit" model of Daniel Koshland, George Némethy and Filmer (KNF model), in which ligand binding at one site causes a local conformational change ("induced fit") that causes small conformational changes at nearby binding sites, affecting their affinity for the ligand. Thus, according to the KNF model, the protein has many slightly different conformational states, corresponding to all possible modes of ligand binding.
Additional information
In non-cooperative binding, the way the affinity depends on the concentration of ligand in solution often is described as "hyperbolic," because a graph of this dependence traces a hyperbola.
See also
References
- Changeux J.-P. (1964). Allosteric interactions interpreted in terms of quaternary structure. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology, 17: 232-249.
- Monod J., Wyman J., and Changeux J.-P. (1965). On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12: 88-118.
External links
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .
