Bilateria
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
|
Please help improve this article by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. This article has been tagged since January 2007. |
| Bilateria Fossil range: Ediacaran - Recent | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image:Amia calva1.jpg A Bowfin , Amia calva
| ||||||
| Scientific classification | ||||||
| ||||||
| Phyla | ||||||
|
The Bilateria (pronounced /ˌbaɪləˈtɪəriə/) are all animals having a bilateral symmetry, i.e. they have a front and a back end, as well as an upside and downside. Radially symmetrical animals like jellyfish have a topside and downside, but no front and back. The bilateralians are a subregnum (a major group) of animals, including the majority of phyla; the most notable exceptions are the sponges and cnidarians. For the most part, Bilateria have bodies that develop from three different germ layers, called the endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm. From this they are called triploblastic. Nearly all are bilaterally symmetrical, or approximately so. The most notable exception is the echinoderms, which achieve near-radial symmetry as adults, but are bilaterally symmetrical as larvae.
Except for a few highly reduced forms, the Bilateria have complete digestive tracts with separate mouth and anus. Most Bilateria also have a type of internal body cavity, called a coelom. It was previously thought that acoelomates gave rise to the other group, but there is some evidence now that in the main acoelomate phyla (flatworms and gastrotrichs) the absence could be secondary.
Contents |
Evolution
The hypothetical last common ancestor of all bilaterians is termed the "Urbilaterian".[1][2] There is some debate about its appearance. The first evidence of bilateria in the fossil record comes from trace fossils in Ediacaran sediments, and the first bona fide bilaterian fossil is Kimberella, dating to Template:Ma.[3] Earlier fossils are controversial; The fossil Vernanimalcula may be the earliest known bilaterian, but may also represent an infilled bubble.[4] Fossil embryos are known from around the time of Vernanimalcula (Template:Ma), but none of these have bilaterian affinities.[5]
Phylogeny
There are two or more superphyla (main lineages) of Bilateria. The deuterostomes include the echinoderms, hemichordates, chordates, and possibly a few smaller phyla. The protostomes include most of the rest, such as arthropods, annelids, mollusks, flatworms, and so forth. There are a number of differences, most notably in how the embryo develops. In particular, the first opening of the embryo becomes the mouth in protostomes, and the anus in deuterostomes. Many taxonomists now recognize at least two more superphyla among the protostomes, Ecdysozoa (molting animals) and Lophotrochozoa. Some taxonomists also recognize another protostome superphylum, Platyzoa, while others would include the Platyzoans in Lophotrochozoa[6] or not include them in any superphylum. The arrow worms (Chaetognatha) have proven particularly difficult to classify, with some taxonomists placing them among the deuterostomes and others placing them among the protostomes. The two most recent studies to address the question of chaetognath origins (Helfenbein et al. 2004 and Papillon et al. 2004) support protostome affinities.
A proposed phylogeny of the Bilateria after Nielsen is as follows.[7] An alternate phylogeny suggests a basal group called the ecdysozoa.
| |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Notes
- ↑ Knoll, Andrew H. and Sean B. Carroll. (1999) Early Animal Evolution: Emerging Views from Comparative Biology and Geology. Science. 25 June 1999: Vol. 284. no. 5423, pp. 2129 - 2137. Found at [1] - URL retrieved November 15, 2006
- ↑ Balavoine, Guillaume, & Adoutte, Andre. 2003. The segmented Urbilateria: A testable scenario. Integrative & Comparative Biology 43: 137-147. Found at [2] - URL retrieved November 15, 2006
- ↑ For refs see Ediacara biota
- ↑ For refs see Vernanimalcula
- ↑ For refs see Fossil embryos
- ↑ The Invertebrate Animals
- ↑ Nielsen, C. 2001. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. Second Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Other references
- Helfenbein, Kevin G., H. Matthew Fourcade, Rohit G. Vanjani, and Jeffrey L. Boore (2004). The mitochondrial genome of Paraspadella gotoi is highly reduced and reveals that chaetognaths are a sister group to protostomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(29), July 20 2004: 10639-10643.
- Papillon, Daniel, Yvan Perez, Xavier Caubit, and Yannick Le Parco (2004). Identification of chaetognaths as protostomes is supported by the analysis of their mitochondrial genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(11), November 2004: 2122-2129.
External links
- Tree of Life web project - Bilateria
- University of California Museum of Paleontology - Systematics of the Metazoaar:ثنائيات التناظر
ca:Bilateri da:Bilateria de:Bilateria et:Kahekülgsedeo:Duflankulo eu:Bilateriako:좌우대칭동물 hr:Bilateralne životinje it:Bilateria la:Bilateria lv:Bilaterāļi hu:Kétoldali szimmetriájú állatok nl:Bilateriano:Bilaterier oc:Bilateriasimple:Bilateria sk:Dvojstranovce sv:Tvåsidiga djuruk:Двобічно-симетричні
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .

